The Personality Inventory for ICD-11: Investigating reliability, structural and concurrent validity, and method variance.


Journal

Psychological assessment
ISSN: 1939-134X
Titre abrégé: Psychol Assess
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8915253

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 27 9 2019
medline: 26 3 2020
entrez: 27 9 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11), recently approved by the World Health Organization, contains a new diagnostic approach for personality disorders. This approach partly involves the consideration of 5 dimensional trait domain qualifiers-Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Dissocial, Disinhibition, and Anankastia. Oltmanns and Widiger (2018) recently developed a self-report measure, the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD), to assess the 5 domains; however, further examination of the psychometric properties of the PiCD is warranted due to its limited research base. The present study aimed to further examine the reliability, structural and concurrent validity, and method variance of the PiCD in an ethnically diverse undergraduate sample (N = 518), who were also administered the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form. First, results suggested that the PiCD domain scales exhibited adequate internal consistency reliability via coefficient categorical omega (range = .77-.87). Next, exploratory structural equation modeling results suggested support for a 4-factor solution, with the 4th factor thought to represent a bipolar continuum of Anankastia to Disinhibition severity. Random-intercept factor analysis results suggested a small amount of variance in items (4.88%) attributable to idiosyncratic scale usage. Lastly, relations between PiCD domains and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form scales (Personality Psychopathology-5 and Higher Order scales) provided support for the validity of the Negative Affectivity, Detachment, and Dissocial domains, though relatively less support for the Disinhibition and Anankastia domains. Further examination of other psychometric properties and the nomological network of the PiCD is recommended. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Identifiants

pubmed: 31556679
pii: 2019-57538-001
doi: 10.1037/pas0000776
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Validation Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

8-17

Subventions

Organisme : University of Minnesota Press

Auteurs

Michael Carnovale (M)

Graduate Department of Psychological Clinical Science.

Martin Sellbom (M)

Department of Psychology.

R Michael Bagby (RM)

Department of Psychology.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH