A biface production older than 600 ka ago at Notarchirico (Southern Italy) contribution to understanding early Acheulean cognition and skills in Europe.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
17
04
2019
accepted:
04
06
2019
entrez:
27
9
2019
pubmed:
27
9
2019
medline:
27
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
For the past decade, debates on the earliest evidence of bifacial shaping in Western Europe have focused on several key issues, such as its origin (i.e., local or introduced), or on what should define the Acheulean culture. Whatever hypotheses are proposed for its origin, the onset and technological strategies for making Large Cutting Tools (LCTs), including biface production, are key issues and are often associated with other behavioural changes, such as increased core technology complexity. Current archaeological patterns do not support the existence of transitional industries. Rather, the scant evidence suggests that biface production associated with the management of bifacial volume was widespread around 700 ka. Among the earliest sites, the site of Notarchirico in Southern Italy stands out as one of the most significant examples. 40Ar/39Ar ages and ESR dates recently provided a revised chronology for the whole sedimentary sequence and constrained the archaeological levels between ca. 610 and 670 ka. Five archaeosurfaces (A, A1, B, D and F) yielded LCTs, including bifaces, during Marcello Piperno's excavations from 1980 to 1995. In light of this new chronological framework, which is much shorter than previously thought, we propose in this contribution a revision of the bifaces by applying the "chaine opératoire" method for the first time (analysis of reduction processes). Our goals are to assess biface production in this early Western European locality and to characterize the strategies applied at the site throughout the sequence. A corpus of 32 tools was selected from the A-A1, B, D and F archaeosurfaces. The technological analysis shows that hominins had the capacity to manage bifacial volumes, when raw material quality was adequate. Clear differences do not emerge between the different levels in terms of shaping modes or final forms. However, we demonstrate that the oldest level (level F), with the richest corpus, lacks flint and displays a higher diversity of bifaces. This ability to manage bifacial and bilateral equilibrium, as well as the diversity of the morphological results, is observed in a few penecontemporaneous sites (700-600 ka), both in the north-western and southern parts of Western Europe. These patterns suggest that hominins mastered well-controlled and diversified biface production, combining intense shaping and minimal shaping, and shared a common technological background regardless of the geographical area, and applied this technology regardless of the available raw materials. The degree of skill complexity of hominins in Western Europe between 700 and 600 ka, the current lack of evidence suggesting "gradual industries" between core-and-flake series and Acheulean techno-complexes, raise numerous questions on the origin of new behaviours in Western Europe, their mode of diffusion, and their association with Homo heidelbergensis or other Middle Pleistocene populations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31557192
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218591
pii: PONE-D-19-10996
pmc: PMC6762110
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0218591Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Evol Anthropol. 2017 Jul;26(4):157-171
pubmed: 28815959
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 22;106(38):16022-7
pubmed: 19805257
Science. 2011 Mar 25;331(6024):1596-9
pubmed: 21436450
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 30;107(13):5762-7
pubmed: 20231433
J Hum Evol. 2018 Dec;125:137-158
pubmed: 30322659
PLoS One. 2017 May 17;12(5):e0177063
pubmed: 28520745
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 25;13(1):e0190889
pubmed: 29370188
J Hum Evol. 2019 Mar;128:45-58
pubmed: 30825981
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 16;107(46):19726-30
pubmed: 21041630
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 20;8(11):e75529
pubmed: 24278105
Evol Anthropol. 2014 Jul-Aug;23(4):126-7
pubmed: 25116842
Nature. 2018 May;557(7704):233-237
pubmed: 29720661
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 30;9(7):e103634
pubmed: 25076416
Evol Anthropol. 2012 May;21(3):101-7
pubmed: 22718477
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 21;10(4):e0124498
pubmed: 25898322
J Hum Evol. 2011 Apr;60(4):387-97
pubmed: 20303143
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28689
pubmed: 22174868
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 29;110(5):1584-91
pubmed: 23359714
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 12;10(10):e0140091
pubmed: 26457581
J Hum Evol. 2011 Feb;60(2):251-5
pubmed: 21129766
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 16;12(11):e0188337
pubmed: 29145489
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 17;7(1):8615
pubmed: 28819227
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Jul 5;371(1698):
pubmed: 27298475
J Hum Evol. 2018 Dec;125:159-180
pubmed: 30268405
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jan 6;106(1):33-7
pubmed: 19104042
Nature. 2010 Jul 8;466(7303):229-33
pubmed: 20613840