Bevacizumab Reduces Permeability and Concurrent Temozolomide Delivery in a Subset of Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma.
Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Bevacizumab
/ administration & dosage
Brain Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Capillary Permeability
/ drug effects
Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion
Female
Glioblastoma
/ drug therapy
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ drug therapy
Positron-Emission Tomography
/ methods
Prognosis
Temozolomide
/ administration & dosage
Journal
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
ISSN: 1557-3265
Titre abrégé: Clin Cancer Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502500
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 01 2020
01 01 2020
Historique:
received:
28
05
2019
revised:
08
08
2019
accepted:
19
09
2019
pubmed:
29
9
2019
medline:
2
10
2020
entrez:
28
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Targeting tumor blood vessels is an attractive therapy in glioblastoma (GBM), but the mechanism of action of these agents and how they modulate delivery of concomitant chemotherapy are not clear in humans. We sought to elucidate how bevacizumab modulates tumor vasculature and the impact those vascular changes have on drug delivery in patients with recurrent GBM. Temozolomide was labeled with [11C], and serial PET-MRI scans were performed in patients with recurrent GBM treated with bevacizumab and daily temozolomide. PET-MRI scans were performed prior to the first bevacizumab dose, 1 day after the first dose, and prior to the third dose of bevacizumab. We calculated tumor volume, vascular permeability ( Twelve patients were enrolled, resulting in 23 evaluable scans. Within the entire contrast-enhancing tumor volume, both temozolomide uptake and vascular permeability decreased after initiation of bevacizumab in most patients, whereas change in perfusion was more variable. In subregions of the tumor where permeability was low and the blood-brain barrier not compromised, increased perfusion correlated with increased temozolomide uptake. Bevacizumab led to a decrease in permeability and concomitant delivery of temozolomide. However, in subregions of the tumor where permeability was low, increased perfusion improved delivery of temozolomide, suggesting that perfusion may modulate the delivery of chemotherapy in certain settings. These results support exploring whether lower doses of bevacizumab improve perfusion and concomitant drug delivery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31558474
pii: 1078-0432.CCR-19-1739
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1739
pmc: PMC7139851
mid: NIHMS1570256
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Temozolomide
YF1K15M17Y
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
206-212Subventions
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : S10 OD023517
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : K23 CA169021
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R35 CA197743
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : F30 CA239407
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA208205
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCRR NIH HHS
ID : S10 RR023043
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA129371
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCRR NIH HHS
ID : P41 RR014075
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.
Références
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Jul 1;13(13):3942-50
pubmed: 17606728
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 20;28(12):2051-7
pubmed: 20308655
J Neurooncol. 2012 Apr;107(2):351-8
pubmed: 22076449
Nature. 2011 May 19;473(7347):298-307
pubmed: 21593862
Org Lett. 2012 Dec 7;14(23):5872-5
pubmed: 23151019
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Apr 9;20(5):589-596
pubmed: 29474640
Cancer Cell. 2012 Jan 17;21(1):82-91
pubmed: 22264790
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 22;370(21):2048-9
pubmed: 24849088
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Nov 1;20(21):4368-80
pubmed: 12409337
Neoplasia. 2018 Jul;20(7):710-720
pubmed: 29852323
Magn Reson Med. 2011 Sep;66(3):735-45
pubmed: 21384424
J Neurooncol. 2015 Mar;122(1):145-50
pubmed: 25575937
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999 Sep;10(3):223-32
pubmed: 10508281
N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):709-22
pubmed: 24552318
Physiol Rev. 2011 Jul;91(3):1071-121
pubmed: 21742796
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 19;110(47):19059-64
pubmed: 24190997
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Aug;15(9):943-53
pubmed: 25035291
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010 May;30(5):1066-78
pubmed: 20087370
Science. 2005 Jan 7;307(5706):58-62
pubmed: 15637262
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 10;31(26):3212-8
pubmed: 23940216
Cancer Cell. 2014 Nov 10;26(5):605-22
pubmed: 25517747
Cancer Res. 2009 Jan 1;69(1):120-7
pubmed: 19117994
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011 Sep;30(9):1617-34
pubmed: 21880566
Anticancer Drugs. 2010 Aug;21(7):687-94
pubmed: 20559127
J Clin Invest. 1993 Jan;91(1):153-9
pubmed: 8380810
Magn Reson Med. 2015 Jun;73(6):2363-75
pubmed: 25046699
Arch Neurol. 1975 Dec;32(12):785-91
pubmed: 1203030
J Neurooncol. 2016 Sep;129(3):487-494
pubmed: 27406589
Neuroimage. 2010 Dec;53(4):1181-96
pubmed: 20637289