Diagnosis of osteoporosis in statin-treated patients is dose-dependent.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Austria
/ epidemiology
Cardiovascular Diseases
/ drug therapy
Cross-Sectional Studies
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Female
Humans
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoporosis
/ chemically induced
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
dose-dependency
osteoporosis
statins
Journal
Annals of the rheumatic diseases
ISSN: 1468-2060
Titre abrégé: Ann Rheum Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
received:
16
05
2019
revised:
27
08
2019
accepted:
12
09
2019
pubmed:
29
9
2019
medline:
10
4
2020
entrez:
28
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Whether HMG-CoA-reductase inhibition, the main mechanism of statins, plays a role in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, is not entirely known so far. Consequently, this study was set out to investigate the relationship of different kinds and dosages of statins with osteoporosis, hypothesising that the inhibition of the synthesis of cholesterol could influence sex-hormones and therefore the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Medical claims data of all Austrians from 2006 to 2007 was used to identify all patients treated with statins to compute their daily defined dose averages of six different types of statins. We applied multiple logistic regression to analyse the dose-dependent risks of being diagnosed with osteoporosis for each statin individually. In the general study population, statin treatment was associated with an overrepresentation of diagnosed osteoporosis compared with controls (OR: 3.62, 95% CI 3.55 to 3.69, p<0.01). There was a highly non-trivial dependence of statin dosage with the ORs of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis was underrepresented in low-dose statin treatment (0-10 mg per day), including lovastatin (OR: 0.39, CI 0.18 to 0.84, p<0.05), pravastatin (OR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.89, p<0.01), simvastatin (OR: 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.86, p<0.01) and rosuvastatin (OR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.87, p<0.01). However, the exceeding of the 40 mg threshold for simvastatin (OR: 1.64, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.07, p<0.01), and the exceeding of a 20 mg threshold for atorvastatin (OR: 1.78, 95% CI 1.41 to 2.23, p<0.01) and for rosuvastatin (OR: 2.04, 95% CI 1.31 to 3.18, p<0.01) was related to an overrepresentation of osteoporosis. Our results show that the diagnosis of osteoporosis in statin-treated patients is dose-dependent. Thus, osteoporosis is underrepresented in low-dose and overrepresented in high-dose statin treatment, demonstrating the importance of future studies' taking dose-dependency into account when investigating the relationship between statins and osteoporosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31558481
pii: annrheumdis-2019-215714
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215714
pmc: PMC6900255
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1706-1711Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
J Clin Invest. 2002 Oct;110(7):881-90
pubmed: 12370263
J Bone Miner Metab. 2017 Nov;35(6):659-665
pubmed: 27873076
J Exp Med. 1997 Aug 18;186(4):489-95
pubmed: 9254647
Lancet. 2000 Jun 24;355(9222):2185-8
pubmed: 10881890
JAMA. 2001 Apr 11;285(14):1850-5
pubmed: 11308398
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Feb;85(2):720-6
pubmed: 10690882
Cell Metab. 2016 Mar 8;23(3):479-91
pubmed: 26777690
Ann Rheum Dis. 1991 Oct;50(10):663-5
pubmed: 1958084
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Jan;28(1):47-57
pubmed: 27888285
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;194(2 Suppl):S3-11
pubmed: 16448873
PLoS One. 2018 May 3;13(5):e0196713
pubmed: 29723231
Ann Pharmacother. 2014 Nov;48(11):1406-14
pubmed: 25070396
Ann Fam Med. 2014 May-Jun;12(3):215-23
pubmed: 24821892
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Feb 1;104(2):250-257
pubmed: 30423123
Eur J Endocrinol. 2015 Aug;173(2):155-65
pubmed: 26034077
Calcif Tissue Int. 2006 Jul;79(1):27-36
pubmed: 16868664
Diabetes Care. 2009 Apr;32(4):541-6
pubmed: 19114614
JAMA. 2000 Jun 28;283(24):3205-10
pubmed: 10866867
Osteoporos Int. 2007 Jan;18(1):9-23
pubmed: 17093892
Eur Heart J. 2016 Oct 14;37(39):2999-3058
pubmed: 27567407
J Sex Med. 2010 Apr;7(4 Pt 1):1547-56
pubmed: 20141585
BMJ. 2010 May 20;340:c2197
pubmed: 20488911
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Mar 1;103(3):991-1004
pubmed: 29325096
Endocr Pract. 2017 Feb;23(2):175-181
pubmed: 27849375
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2008 Apr;10(2):92-6
pubmed: 18460262
J Intern Med. 2017 Feb;281(2):206-216
pubmed: 27766700
Reprod Toxicol. 2015 Dec;58:174-83
pubmed: 26476359
BMC Med. 2013 Feb 28;11:57
pubmed: 23448151
Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jan 18;10:159-165
pubmed: 29403315
Rev Saude Publica. 2010 Jun;44(3):479-85
pubmed: 20549019
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000 May 19;271(3):688-92
pubmed: 10814523