Plantar Partial Pressure Analysis in a Patient with Reverse Extensor Digitorum Brevis Flap for the Treatment of Hallux Injury.
Extensor digitorum brevis flap
gait analysis
hallux
plantar partial pressure analysis
toe reconstruction
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic case reports
ISSN: 2250-0685
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Case Rep
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101641392
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
entrez:
28
9
2019
pubmed:
29
9
2019
medline:
29
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
An extensor digitorum brevis (EDB) flap can be used to cover a small soft-tissue defect and has been widely used as pedicled flap to cover defects around the ankle and foot. However, its post-operative functional recovery is unknown. Few reports have evaluated gait after foot flap surgeries, although gait assessment is considered to be necessary for functional evaluation after foot reconstruction. We performed a reverse EDB flap to treat a right hallux injury and conducted a plantar partial pressure (PPP) analysis as a postoperative functional evaluation. A 30-year-old laborer suffered an injury resulting in necrosis of the distal phalanx and soft-tissue defect of the proximal phalanx. After amputation, the proximal phalanx was covered with a reverse EDB flap. PPP analysis involved a 4-m-long platform system (P-Walk) and was conducted 3- and 12-month post-surgery. Walking velocity and the single-support phase on the affected limb had increased markedly after 12 months. After 12 months, the PPP of the first metatarsal head was greater than on the unaffected side, and the cadence and single-leg support rate were equal to the unaffected side. A nearly normal gait was obtained by covering the basal part of the hallux with an EDB flap and preserving the metatarsophalangeal joint.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31559234
doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.1430
pii: JOCR-9-75
pmc: PMC6742865
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
75-78Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest: Nil
Références
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Apr;105(4):1347-56
pubmed: 10744224
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Sep 15;110(4):1047-54; discussion 1055-7
pubmed: 12198416
Ann Plast Surg. 2003 Sep;51(3):273-7
pubmed: 12966239
J Orthop Sci. 2005 May;10(3):298-301
pubmed: 15928893
Ann Plast Surg. 2006 Sep;57(3):289-94
pubmed: 16929197
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007 May;22(4):478-85
pubmed: 17239508
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Oct;62(10):1317-20
pubmed: 18672414
J Orthop Sci. 2008 Jul;13(4):341-7
pubmed: 18696193
Indian J Plast Surg. 2008 Jan;41(1):62-6
pubmed: 19753204
J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(6):561-70
pubmed: 2037861
Foot Ankle Surg. 2010 Dec;16(4):178-82
pubmed: 21047606
J Craniofac Surg. 2011 May;22(3):998-9
pubmed: 21558906
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012 Apr;65(4):482-8
pubmed: 22133379
Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Mar;21(1):60-6
pubmed: 25682409
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Dec;30(12):e404-e408
pubmed: 27392161
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Feb;137(2):273-276
pubmed: 28005165
J Orthop Sci. 2017 Nov;22(6):1054-1059
pubmed: 28844292
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989 Jan;83(1):100-9
pubmed: 2909049
Ann Plast Surg. 1985 Dec;15(6):481-8
pubmed: 3880197
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985 Jun;75(6):892-7
pubmed: 4001210
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Jan;(286):241-6
pubmed: 8425352
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Jul;102(1):103-10
pubmed: 9655414