Incidence of acute thermal esophageal injury after atrial fibrillation ablation guided by prespecified ablation index.
Aged
Atrial Fibrillation
/ diagnosis
Burns
/ diagnosis
Catheter Ablation
/ adverse effects
Esophagoscopy
Esophagus
/ drug effects
Female
Germany
/ epidemiology
Hot Temperature
/ adverse effects
Humans
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Proton Pump Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Wound Healing
ablation index
atrial fibrillation
endoscopically detected esophageal thermal lesion
esophageal thermal injury
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
ISSN: 1540-8167
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010756
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2019
11 2019
Historique:
received:
15
06
2019
revised:
07
09
2019
accepted:
16
09
2019
pubmed:
29
9
2019
medline:
21
10
2020
entrez:
28
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ablation index (AI), a novel parameter defining energy application at single ablation lesions, calculated by integration of ablation time, energy, catheter stability, and contact force, has been documented to be associated with effective lesions and higher ablation efficacy. Using a prespecified target AI in addition to acute lesion efficacy may affect local collateral damage like esophageal thermal injury when used for guiding radiofrequency (RF) ablation at the posterior left atrial (LA) wall. Consecutive patients undergoing first AF ablations using AI were included. Ablation energy was reduced to 25 W when ablating at posterior LA wall. Two different individually defined AI target values were used (300 and 350 for posterior wall ablation). Esophageal endoscopy (EE) was performed 1 to 3 days after ablation procedure to document and categorize endoscopically detected esophageal thermal lesion (EDEL). Two-hundred and eleven consecutive patients with postprocedural EE were included. Incidence of EDEL was 14% (29 of 211 patients; mild category 1 lesions in 22 of 29 patients (76%) and severe category 2 lesions (ulcers > 5 mm) in 7 of 29 patients (24% of EDEL group, 3% of total group). Ablation time at posterior LA wall (9.5 vs 9.0 minutes [P = .67]) was comparable in patients with and without EDEL. LA posterior wall RF ablation adopting AI ≤350 was associated with 14% esophageal thermal injury including 3% of severe esophageal thermal ulcers. This incidence is comparable to historic control groups with non AI-guided AF ablation.
Substances chimiques
Proton Pump Inhibitors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2256-2261Informations de copyright
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.