Patterns of recurrence after prostate bed radiotherapy.


Journal

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
ISSN: 1879-0887
Titre abrégé: Radiother Oncol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8407192

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2019
Historique:
received: 31 07 2019
revised: 04 09 2019
accepted: 05 09 2019
pubmed: 30 9 2019
medline: 20 5 2020
entrez: 30 9 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Prostate bed radiotherapy is a standard treatment after radical prostatectomy. Recent evidence suggests that, for patients with a PSA > 0.34 ng/ml, the radiotherapy treatment volume should include not only the prostate bed but also the pelvic lymph nodes. We describe the patterns of failure after prostate bed radiotherapy, focussing on the proportion of patients with radiologically confirmed pelvic nodal failure only, in the absence of distant disease. Patients included were men receiving prostate bed radiotherapy at the Royal Marsden Hospital between 1997 and 2013. The key outcome of interest was the pattern of radiologic failure after prostate bed radiotherapy. Baseline characteristics of patients experiencing pelvic nodal failure without distant disease were compared versus all other relapse patterns. Comparisons were by Chi-square test, with multiple testing adjusted p < 0.005 significant. 140 of 322 patients developed biochemical failure after salvage RT. Radiologic failure occurred in 89 patients. 35 of the 89 patients (39%) with radiologic failure had pelvic nodal failure without distant disease, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics when compared to all other patients. The rate of pelvic nodal failure was the same for patients with PSA above or below 0.34 ng/ml (16/149, 95% CI = 6-17% vs 19/171, 95% CI = 7-17%). Pelvic lymph node disease, without more distant disease, is a common site of failure in men receiving radiotherapy to the prostate bed, including those with PSA < 0.34 ng/ml. This observation informs the case for including the pelvic lymph nodes in the radiotherapy treatment volume.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Prostate bed radiotherapy is a standard treatment after radical prostatectomy. Recent evidence suggests that, for patients with a PSA > 0.34 ng/ml, the radiotherapy treatment volume should include not only the prostate bed but also the pelvic lymph nodes. We describe the patterns of failure after prostate bed radiotherapy, focussing on the proportion of patients with radiologically confirmed pelvic nodal failure only, in the absence of distant disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients included were men receiving prostate bed radiotherapy at the Royal Marsden Hospital between 1997 and 2013. The key outcome of interest was the pattern of radiologic failure after prostate bed radiotherapy. Baseline characteristics of patients experiencing pelvic nodal failure without distant disease were compared versus all other relapse patterns. Comparisons were by Chi-square test, with multiple testing adjusted p < 0.005 significant.
RESULTS
140 of 322 patients developed biochemical failure after salvage RT. Radiologic failure occurred in 89 patients. 35 of the 89 patients (39%) with radiologic failure had pelvic nodal failure without distant disease, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics when compared to all other patients. The rate of pelvic nodal failure was the same for patients with PSA above or below 0.34 ng/ml (16/149, 95% CI = 6-17% vs 19/171, 95% CI = 7-17%).
CONCLUSIONS
Pelvic lymph node disease, without more distant disease, is a common site of failure in men receiving radiotherapy to the prostate bed, including those with PSA < 0.34 ng/ml. This observation informs the case for including the pelvic lymph nodes in the radiotherapy treatment volume.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31563410
pii: S0167-8140(19)33091-9
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.09.007
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Prostate-Specific Antigen EC 3.4.21.77

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

174-180

Subventions

Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 10588
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 12518
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Douglas H Brand (DH)

Urological Oncology Department, Royal Marsden Hospital, London & Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London & Sutton, UK.

Joanna I Parker (JI)

Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London & Sutton, UK.

David P Dearnaley (DP)

Urological Oncology Department, Royal Marsden Hospital, London & Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London & Sutton, UK.

Rosalind Eeles (R)

Urological Oncology Department, Royal Marsden Hospital, London & Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London & Sutton, UK.

Robert Huddart (R)

Urological Oncology Department, Royal Marsden Hospital, London & Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London & Sutton, UK.

Vincent Khoo (V)

Urological Oncology Department, Royal Marsden Hospital, London & Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London & Sutton, UK.

Julia Murray (J)

Urological Oncology Department, Royal Marsden Hospital, London & Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London & Sutton, UK.

Yae-Eun Suh (YE)

Urological Oncology Department, Royal Marsden Hospital, London & Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London & Sutton, UK.

Alison C Tree (AC)

Urological Oncology Department, Royal Marsden Hospital, London & Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London & Sutton, UK.

Nicholas van As (N)

Urological Oncology Department, Royal Marsden Hospital, London & Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London & Sutton, UK.

Chris Parker (C)

Urological Oncology Department, Royal Marsden Hospital, London & Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London & Sutton, UK. Electronic address: Chris.parker@icr.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH