Treatment Effectiveness for Resolution of Multiple Sclerosis Relapse in a US Health Plan Population.
Corticosteroids
Intravenous immunoglobulin
Multiple sclerosis relapse
Plasmapheresis
Repository corticotropin injection
Journal
Neurology and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8253
Titre abrégé: Neurol Ther
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101637818
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
26
07
2019
pubmed:
30
9
2019
medline:
30
9
2019
entrez:
30
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Timely and effective resolution of multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse is critical to minimizing residual deficits, which can result in neurologic disability. Oral corticosteroids (OCS) and intravenous corticosteroids [intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP)] are earlier line treatments; alternatives include repository corticotropin injection (RCI; H.P. Acthar To evaluate relapse rates, frequency of treatments used, and treatment effectiveness (i.e., relapse resolution). A retrospective analysis of patients ages 18-89 years experiencing MS relapse from 1 January 2008 to 30 June 2015 was conducted using administrative claims data. MS relapse was defined based on established claims-based methodology. The first claim for relapse treatment (i.e., prescription or administration) was used to designate the treatment group and relapse date, respectively. Relapses occurring ≤ 30 days were considered an episode. The first relapse episode was identified for every patient. Treatment was deemed effective in resolving the relapse if no additional relapses followed within the episode; otherwise, the relapse was considered unresolved. A 5-day OCS taper following IVMP administration, designated IVMP ± OCS, was allowed. Relapse frequency, treatment use, and relapse resolution were quantified. Relapse resolution was likewise evaluated in patients continuously enrolled for 12 months before and after first treatment with RCI or PMP/IVIG, with PMP/IVIG administrations within 7 days of each other being considered a single course of therapy. During the study period, 9574 patients experienced ≥ 1 relapse; 26.0% of patients had ≥ 2 relapses/year. The mean number of relapse episodes was 2.6 over a mean follow-up of 2.7 years for an annualized relapse rate of 1.0. Corticosteroids were the first treatment used in 90.4% of relapses (OCS = 51.8%, IVMP = 38.6%), followed by IVIG (6.0%), RCI (2.2%) and PMP (1.5%). The proportion of patients achieving relapse resolution with their first treatment was 90.5% with OCS (n = 5710), 47.8% with IVMP ± OCS (n = 3425), 96.9% with RCI (n = 195), 50.7% with PMP (n = 73), and 43.9% with IVIG (n = 171). Among continuously enrolled patients (n = 373), relapse resolution was 95.7% with RCI (n = 232) and 66.0% with PMP/IVIG (n = 141); significant cohort differences were observed. As demonstrated in other studies, OCS were generally effective. However, real-world effectiveness varied with other treatments. Relapse resolution of the first treatment with OCS was higher than with IVMP ± OCS; similarly, relapse resolution was higher with RCI as the first treatment than with PMP/IVIG. Results demonstrate RCI's effectiveness in appropriate patients. Limitations pertaining to claims-based research apply. Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals (Bedminster, NJ).
Identifiants
pubmed: 31564036
doi: 10.1007/s40120-019-00156-5
pii: 10.1007/s40120-019-00156-5
pmc: PMC6858912
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
383-395Références
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987 May;50(5):511-6
pubmed: 3295122
Eur Neurol. 1989;29(1):10-4
pubmed: 2540005
BMC Neurol. 2017 Aug 7;17(1):151
pubmed: 28784102
Neurology. 1989 Jul;39(7):969-71
pubmed: 2544829
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2016 Aug;22(3):799-814
pubmed: 27261683
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985 Feb;48(2):157-9
pubmed: 2984332
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2015 Nov;8(8):426-31
pubmed: 26702334
Ital J Neurol Sci. 1983 Jun;4(2):169-72
pubmed: 6311774
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2019 Jan;25(1):78-85
pubmed: 29858532
Neurology. 2011 Jan 18;76(3):294-300
pubmed: 21242498
Clin Neuropharmacol. 2011 Mar-Apr;34(2):84-9
pubmed: 21301327
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 27;12(11):e0188644
pubmed: 29176905
J Med Econ. 2010;13(4):618-25
pubmed: 20883151
Neurology. 1998 Aug;51(2):529-34
pubmed: 9710030
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;64(9):993-1000
pubmed: 21411281
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD006921
pubmed: 23235634
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Nov;26:219-234
pubmed: 30368080
Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444-52
pubmed: 6685237
J Manag Care Pharm. 2002 Nov-Dec;8(6):469-76
pubmed: 14740608
Value Health. 2014 Mar;17(2):143-56
pubmed: 24636373
Neurotherapeutics. 2013 Jan;10(1):97-105
pubmed: 23229226
Neurology. 1986 Feb;36(2):238-43
pubmed: 3511404
Adv Ther. 2016 Aug;33(8):1279-92
pubmed: 27312977
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 May;22:27-34
pubmed: 29524759
Lancet. 1997 Mar 29;349(9056):902-6
pubmed: 9093250
BMC Neurol. 2013 Sep 10;13:119
pubmed: 24016260
Neurologist. 2009 Jan;15(1):1-5
pubmed: 19131851
Neuroepidemiology. 2015;44(4):199-214
pubmed: 25997994
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2015 May;4(3):234-40
pubmed: 26008940
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993 Nov;56(11):1219-20
pubmed: 8229035