Assessment of Reliability of YouTube Videos on Orthodontics.
YouTube
internet
orthodontic treatment
orthodontics
orthodontist
Journal
Turkish journal of orthodontics
ISSN: 2148-9505
Titre abrégé: Turk J Orthod
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101726582
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
08
09
2018
accepted:
25
12
2018
entrez:
1
10
2019
pubmed:
1
10
2019
medline:
1
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In addition to being an entertainment channel, YouTube is also one of the most popular visual information sources today. People search YouTube to consult also on orthodontics, as well as on many other topics. The objective of the present study was to analyze the quality and reliability of information of the videos on YouTube about orthodontics. YouTube was searched systematically by two researchers on orthodontics by using the keywords "Orthodontics," "Orthodontist," and "Orthodontic Treatment." Videos on the first three pages (60 videos) for each keyword were assessed. Researchers evaluated the reliability of the videos by using the Reliability Score (adapted from DISCERN) and the quality of the videos by using the Global Quality Score (GQS). The mean GQS results were 2.6±1.3 for videos in the "Orthodontist" group, 3.2±1.3 for videos in the "Orthodontics" group, and 2.3±1.2 for videos in the "Orthodontic Treatment" group on a 5-point scale. The Reliability Score results were 2, 2, and 1.5 for videos in the "Orthodontist," "Orthodontics," and "Orthodontic Treatment" groups, respectively, on a 5-point scale. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient results presented a positive relationship between the researchers. Owing to the lack of peer-review process and pre-upload scientific evaluation process, videos on YouTube can lead the public to misinformation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31565689
doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18064
pii: tjo-32-03-145
pmc: PMC6756568
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
145-150Informations de copyright
© Copyright 2019 by Turkish Orthodontic Society.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Références
J Adolesc Health. 2012 Oct;51(4):380-5
pubmed: 22999839
J Rheumatol. 2012 May;39(5):899-903
pubmed: 22467934
JAMA. 2007 Dec 5;298(21):2482-4
pubmed: 18056901
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Sep;102(9):2070-7
pubmed: 17511753
Angle Orthod. 2018 Mar;88(2):208-214
pubmed: 29257704
Urology. 2011 Mar;77(3):558-62
pubmed: 21131027
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Nov;27(6):437-443
pubmed: 27882621
Resuscitation. 2011 Mar;82(3):332-4
pubmed: 21185643
Oral Dis. 2016 Apr;22(3):202-8
pubmed: 26718020
Health Commun. 2012;27(5):478-85
pubmed: 22029723
J Dent Educ. 2011 Dec;75(12):1558-68
pubmed: 22184594
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 18;8(12):e82469
pubmed: 24367517
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):e1-3
pubmed: 20171526
Turk J Orthod. 2017 Sep;30(3):78-83
pubmed: 30112497
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Feb;53(2):105-11
pubmed: 10396471
Turk J Orthod. 2018 Jun;31(2):50-54
pubmed: 30112514
Urology. 2010 Mar;75(3):619-22
pubmed: 19815255
J Orthod. 2017 Jun;44(2):90-96
pubmed: 28463076
Angle Orthod. 2011 May;81(3):532-9
pubmed: 21261492
N Engl J Med. 1996 Jun 13;334(24):1578-82
pubmed: 8628340