Contrast Echocardiography in two-dimensional left ventricular measurements: comparison with 256-row multi-detector computed tomography as a reference standard in Beagles.
Contrast echocardiography
cardiac computed tomography
dogs
left ventricular measurements
multidetector computed tomography
Journal
Journal of veterinary science
ISSN: 1976-555X
Titre abrégé: J Vet Sci
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 100964185
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
10
05
2019
revised:
20
06
2019
accepted:
17
07
2019
entrez:
1
10
2019
pubmed:
1
10
2019
medline:
14
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Unenhanced echocardiography (UE), commonly used in veterinary practice, is limited by left ventricular (LV) foreshortening and observer dependency. Contrast echocardiography (CE) was used to compare two-dimensional (2D) LV measurements made using UE and 256-row multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) as a reference standard. Seven healthy beagle dogs were evaluated in this study. Measurements obtained using CE, including LV wall thickness, internal diameter, and longitudinal and transverse length, were significantly greater than those obtained using UE. Measurements of LV internal dimension in diastole (LVIDd) and systole (LVIDs) were significantly larger with CE compared UE. Regardless of the cardiac cycle, LV longitudinal (LVLd and LVLs) and transverse diameter (LVTDd and LVTDs) measurements were significantly different with CE and approximated values from MDCT. Among automatically calculated parameters, LV end-systolic volume and the relative wall thickness were significantly different between UE and CE. In CE, the correlation coefficients of 4 major parameters (
Identifiants
pubmed: 31565888
pii: 20.e45
doi: 10.4142/jvs.2019.20.e45
pmc: PMC6769328
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e45Subventions
Organisme : Konkuk University
Pays : Korea
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Korean Society of Veterinary Science.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Can J Cardiol. 2007 Apr;23(5):351-6
pubmed: 17440639
J Small Anim Pract. 2009 Sep;50 Suppl 1:12-24
pubmed: 19765216
J Small Anim Pract. 2009 Sep;50 Suppl 1:25-33
pubmed: 19765217
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2005 May-Jun;46(3):192-9
pubmed: 16050275
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2015 Nov-Dec;56(6):638-57
pubmed: 26082285
Am J Vet Res. 2012 Feb;73(2):194-201
pubmed: 22280378
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000 Apr;13(4):331-42
pubmed: 10756254
Vet J. 2013 Nov;198(2):450-6
pubmed: 24095607
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Jul;28(7):727-54
pubmed: 26140936
J Vet Intern Med. 2008 Jan-Feb;22(1):120-8
pubmed: 18289298
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;16(3):233-70
pubmed: 25712077
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2000 May-Jun;36(3):199-208
pubmed: 10825090
Eur Radiol. 2012 May;22(5):1041-9
pubmed: 22270140
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2010 Jan;12(1):68-75
pubmed: 20425186
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009 Mar;10(2):194-212
pubmed: 19270054
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008 May;21(5):409-16
pubmed: 18329848
J Vet Cardiol. 2012 Mar;14(1):127-48
pubmed: 22366573
Am J Vet Res. 2013 Sep;74(9):1223-30
pubmed: 23977895
J Vet Cardiol. 2007 May;9(1):15-24
pubmed: 17689465
J Vet Cardiol. 2015 Mar;17(1):1-12
pubmed: 25586168
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Apr;25 Suppl 1:23-9
pubmed: 19255875
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2007 Jun;8(3):S13-23
pubmed: 17481562
World J Radiol. 2014 Sep 28;6(9):669-76
pubmed: 25276310
J Vet Med Sci. 2012 Dec;74(12):1597-602
pubmed: 22850528
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008 Nov;21(11):1179-201; quiz 1281
pubmed: 18992671
Am J Vet Res. 2013 Jan;74(1):62-9
pubmed: 23270347
Am J Cardiol. 1996 Jul 15;78(2):197-202
pubmed: 8712142