Antifungal effects of a 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivative determined by cytochemical and vibrational spectroscopic studies.
Antifungal Agents
/ chemical synthesis
Aspergillus niger
/ chemistry
Candida albicans
/ chemistry
Candida glabrata
/ chemistry
Candida parapsilosis
/ chemistry
Candida tropicalis
/ chemistry
Candidiasis
/ microbiology
Cell Line
Cell Survival
/ drug effects
Cell Wall
/ chemistry
Chitin
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Drug Resistance, Fungal
/ drug effects
Fibroblasts
/ cytology
Glucans
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Humans
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Rhodotorula
/ chemistry
Thiadiazoles
/ chemical synthesis
Trichophyton
/ chemistry
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
18
02
2019
accepted:
06
09
2019
entrez:
1
10
2019
pubmed:
1
10
2019
medline:
13
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Compounds belonging to the group of 5-substituted 4-(1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl) benzene-1,3-diols exhibit a broad spectrum of biological activity, including antibacterial, antifungal, and anticancer properties. The mechanism of the antifungal activity of compounds from this group has not been described to date. Among the large group of 5-substituted 4-(1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl) benzene-1,3-diol derivatives, the compound 4-(5-methyl-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-yl) benzene-1,3-diol, abbreviated as C1, was revealed to be one of the most active agents against pathogenic fungi, simultaneously with the lowest toxicity to human cells. The C1 compound is a potent antifungal agent against different Candida species, including isolates resistant to azoles, and molds, with MIC100 values ranging from 8 to 96 μg/ml. The antifungal activity of the C1 compound involves disruption of the cell wall biogenesis, as evidenced by the inability of cells treated with C1 to maintain their characteristic cell shape, increase in size, form giant cells and flocculate. C1-treated cells were also unable to withstand internal turgor pressure causing protoplast material to leak out, exhibited reduced osmotic resistance and formed buds that were not covered with chitin. Disturbances in the chitin septum in the neck region of budding cells was observed, as well as an uneven distribution of chitin and β(1→3) glucan, and increased sensitivity to substances interacting with wall polymerization. The ATR-FTIR spectral shifts in cell walls extracted from C. albicans cells treated with the C1 compound suggested weakened interactions between the molecules of β(1→3) glucans and β(1→6) glucans, which may be the cause of impaired cell wall integrity. Significant spectral changes in the C1-treated cells were also observed in bands characteristic for chitin. The C1 compound did not affect the ergosterol content in Candida cells. Given the low cytotoxicity of the C1 compound to normal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDF), it is possible to use this compound as a therapeutic agent in the treatment of surface and gastrointestinal tract mycoses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31568502
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222775
pii: PONE-D-19-04921
pmc: PMC6768478
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antifungal Agents
0
Glucans
0
Thiadiazoles
0
Chitin
1398-61-4
1,3,4-thiadiazole
14IAC3GH7G
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0222775Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013 Sep;11(9):648-55
pubmed: 23949603
F1000 Med Rep. 2011;3:14
pubmed: 21876720
Lancet. 2002 Mar 30;359(9312):1135-44
pubmed: 11943280
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001 Apr 13;197(2):179-86
pubmed: 11313132
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018 May 31;12:1545-1566
pubmed: 29910602
Autophagy. 2012 Feb 1;8(2):236-51
pubmed: 22240589
Microbiology. 2017 Aug;163(8):1145-1147
pubmed: 28809155
Am J Transplant. 2013 Mar;13 Suppl 4:262-71
pubmed: 23465019
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2002 Dec;1(12):967-82
pubmed: 12543933
J Biol Chem. 2009 May 15;284(20):13401-12
pubmed: 19279004
Eukaryot Cell. 2006 Jan;5(1):140-7
pubmed: 16400176
Front Microbiol. 2016 Feb 02;7:64
pubmed: 26870022
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Oct;37(10):3332-7
pubmed: 10488201
Arch Microbiol. 2006 May;185(4):277-85
pubmed: 16474951
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007 Mar;387(5):1779-89
pubmed: 17106657
Mol Med Rep. 2015 Apr;11(4):2585-91
pubmed: 25503826
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006 Jun;70(2):317-43
pubmed: 16760306
Mutat Res. 2001 Oct 18;497(1-2):213-22
pubmed: 11525924
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 May;14 Suppl 4:5-24
pubmed: 18430126
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017 Feb;15(2):96-108
pubmed: 27867199
Am J Transplant. 2012 Sep;12(9):2414-28
pubmed: 22694672
Sabouraudia. 1981 Jun;19(2):97-110
pubmed: 7020114
Nat Rev Immunol. 2015 Oct;15(10):630-42
pubmed: 26388329
Mol Biol Cell. 2014 Jan;25(2):222-33
pubmed: 24258022
Chem Biol Drug Des. 2013 May;81(5):557-76
pubmed: 23452185
Yeast. 1998 Sep 30;14(13):1159-66
pubmed: 9791887
J Comp Pathol. 2016 Aug-Oct;155(2-3):93-94
pubmed: 27476107
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2002 Aug;26(3):239-56
pubmed: 12165426
Bioorg Khim. 2007 Nov-Dec;33(6):640-7
pubmed: 18173128
Microbiology. 2004 Oct;150(Pt 10):3341-54
pubmed: 15470113
J Phys Chem B. 2016 Dec 1;120(47):12047-12063
pubmed: 27798830
Methods Cell Biol. 1994;41:185-94
pubmed: 7532261
Eur J Med Chem. 2006 Apr;41(4):475-82
pubmed: 16517026
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 24;112(12):E1490-7
pubmed: 25775513
J Biol Chem. 2009 Mar 27;284(13):8461-9
pubmed: 19097997
Drug Resist Updat. 2011 Jun;14(3):164-76
pubmed: 21353623
Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2017 Apr;27(4):415-426
pubmed: 27897041
Am J Med Sci. 2010 Sep;340(3):253-7
pubmed: 20823702
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2009 Oct;7(8):981-98
pubmed: 19803707
FEMS Yeast Res. 2018 Aug 1;18(5):
pubmed: 29718196