Identifying pediatric diabetes cases from health administrative data: a population-based validation study in Quebec, Canada.

diabetes health administrative data pediatric validation

Journal

Clinical epidemiology
ISSN: 1179-1349
Titre abrégé: Clin Epidemiol
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101531700

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 01 06 2019
accepted: 13 08 2019
entrez: 2 10 2019
pubmed: 2 10 2019
medline: 2 10 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Type 1 diabetes is one of the most common chronic diseases in childhood with a worldwide incidence that is increasing by 3-5% per year. The incidence of type 2 diabetes, traditionally viewed as an adult disease, is increasing at alarming rates in children, paralleling the rise in childhood obesity. As the rates of diabetes increase in children, accurate population-based assessment of disease burden is important for those implementing strategies for health services delivery. Health administrative data are a powerful tool that can be used to track disease burden, health services use, and health outcomes. Case validation is essential in ensuring accurate disease identification using administrative databases. The aim of our study was to define and validate a pediatric diabetes case ascertainment algorithm (including any form of childhood-onset diabetes) using health administrative data. We conducted a two-stage method using linked health administrative data and data extracted from charts. In stage 1, we linked chart data from a large urban region to health administrative data and compared the diagnostic accuracy of various algorithms. We selected those that performed the best to be validated in stage 2. In stage 2, the most accurate algorithms were validated with chart data within two other geographic areas in the province of Quebec. Accurate identification of diabetes in children (ages ≤15 years) required four physician claims or one hospitalization (with International Classification of Disease codes within 1 year (sensitivity 91.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 89.2-92.9]; positive predictive value [PPV] 93.5%, 95% CI 91.7-95.0) or using only four physician claims in 2 years (sensitivity 90.4%, 95% CI 88.3-92.2; PPV 93.2%, 95% CI 91.7-95.0). Separating the physician claims by 30 days increased the PPV of all algorithms tested. Patients with child-onset diabetes can be accurately identified within health administrative databases providing a valid source of information for health care resource planning and evaluation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Type 1 diabetes is one of the most common chronic diseases in childhood with a worldwide incidence that is increasing by 3-5% per year. The incidence of type 2 diabetes, traditionally viewed as an adult disease, is increasing at alarming rates in children, paralleling the rise in childhood obesity. As the rates of diabetes increase in children, accurate population-based assessment of disease burden is important for those implementing strategies for health services delivery. Health administrative data are a powerful tool that can be used to track disease burden, health services use, and health outcomes. Case validation is essential in ensuring accurate disease identification using administrative databases.
AIM OBJECTIVE
The aim of our study was to define and validate a pediatric diabetes case ascertainment algorithm (including any form of childhood-onset diabetes) using health administrative data.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS METHODS
We conducted a two-stage method using linked health administrative data and data extracted from charts. In stage 1, we linked chart data from a large urban region to health administrative data and compared the diagnostic accuracy of various algorithms. We selected those that performed the best to be validated in stage 2. In stage 2, the most accurate algorithms were validated with chart data within two other geographic areas in the province of Quebec.
RESULTS RESULTS
Accurate identification of diabetes in children (ages ≤15 years) required four physician claims or one hospitalization (with International Classification of Disease codes within 1 year (sensitivity 91.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 89.2-92.9]; positive predictive value [PPV] 93.5%, 95% CI 91.7-95.0) or using only four physician claims in 2 years (sensitivity 90.4%, 95% CI 88.3-92.2; PPV 93.2%, 95% CI 91.7-95.0). Separating the physician claims by 30 days increased the PPV of all algorithms tested.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Patients with child-onset diabetes can be accurately identified within health administrative databases providing a valid source of information for health care resource planning and evaluation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31572014
doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S217969
pii: 217969
pmc: PMC6750203
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

833-843

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

© 2019 Nakhla et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Laurent Legault has served on advisory boards for Medtronic and Lilly; has received grants for unrelated research from Merck, Sanofi and AstraZeneca; and holds a share of intellectual property not related to this work. No competing interests were declared by any other authors in this work.

Références

Biometrics. 2007 Mar;63(1):272-9
pubmed: 17447953
Gut. 2009 Nov;58(11):1490-7
pubmed: 19651626
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;67(8):887-96
pubmed: 24774473
Diabetes Care. 2010 Apr;33(4):786-91
pubmed: 20067956
Diabetes Care. 2005 Oct;28(10):2384-7
pubmed: 16186267
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 06;12(10):e1001885
pubmed: 26440803
Diabetes Care. 2011 Apr;34(4):898-903
pubmed: 21378211
Pediatr Diabetes. 2010 Mar;11(2):122-8
pubmed: 19500278
J Rheumatol. 2013 Aug;40(8):1334-6
pubmed: 23772078
Diabetes Care. 2013 Oct;36(10):3002-8
pubmed: 23656982
Diabet Med. 2011 Apr;28(4):424-7
pubmed: 21392063
Can J Diabetes. 2013 Apr;37 Suppl 1:S4-7
pubmed: 24070961
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;64(8):821-9
pubmed: 21194889
J Rheumatol. 2019 Mar 15;:null
pubmed: 30877218
Biometrics. 2004 Jun;60(2):388-97
pubmed: 15180664
Arch Dis Child. 1999 Oct;81(4):318-23
pubmed: 10490436
J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(9):923-37
pubmed: 3054000
Lancet. 2009 Jun 13;373(9680):2027-33
pubmed: 19481249
BMJ. 2010 Aug 19;341:c4226
pubmed: 20724404

Auteurs

Meranda Nakhla (M)

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology, Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Centre for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Marc Simard (M)

Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Québec, QC, Canada.

Marjolaine Dube (M)

Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Québec, QC, Canada.

Isabelle Larocque (I)

Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Québec, QC, Canada.

Céline Plante (C)

Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Québec, QC, Canada.

Laurent Legault (L)

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology, Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Centre for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Celine Huot (C)

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Nancy Gagné (N)

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.

Julie Gagné (J)

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.

Sarah Wafa (S)

Centre for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Eric I Benchimol (EI)

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario IBD Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Canada.
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Elham Rahme (E)

Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Classifications MeSH