Identifying pediatric diabetes cases from health administrative data: a population-based validation study in Quebec, Canada.
diabetes
health administrative data
pediatric
validation
Journal
Clinical epidemiology
ISSN: 1179-1349
Titre abrégé: Clin Epidemiol
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101531700
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
01
06
2019
accepted:
13
08
2019
entrez:
2
10
2019
pubmed:
2
10
2019
medline:
2
10
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Type 1 diabetes is one of the most common chronic diseases in childhood with a worldwide incidence that is increasing by 3-5% per year. The incidence of type 2 diabetes, traditionally viewed as an adult disease, is increasing at alarming rates in children, paralleling the rise in childhood obesity. As the rates of diabetes increase in children, accurate population-based assessment of disease burden is important for those implementing strategies for health services delivery. Health administrative data are a powerful tool that can be used to track disease burden, health services use, and health outcomes. Case validation is essential in ensuring accurate disease identification using administrative databases. The aim of our study was to define and validate a pediatric diabetes case ascertainment algorithm (including any form of childhood-onset diabetes) using health administrative data. We conducted a two-stage method using linked health administrative data and data extracted from charts. In stage 1, we linked chart data from a large urban region to health administrative data and compared the diagnostic accuracy of various algorithms. We selected those that performed the best to be validated in stage 2. In stage 2, the most accurate algorithms were validated with chart data within two other geographic areas in the province of Quebec. Accurate identification of diabetes in children (ages ≤15 years) required four physician claims or one hospitalization (with International Classification of Disease codes within 1 year (sensitivity 91.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 89.2-92.9]; positive predictive value [PPV] 93.5%, 95% CI 91.7-95.0) or using only four physician claims in 2 years (sensitivity 90.4%, 95% CI 88.3-92.2; PPV 93.2%, 95% CI 91.7-95.0). Separating the physician claims by 30 days increased the PPV of all algorithms tested. Patients with child-onset diabetes can be accurately identified within health administrative databases providing a valid source of information for health care resource planning and evaluation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Type 1 diabetes is one of the most common chronic diseases in childhood with a worldwide incidence that is increasing by 3-5% per year. The incidence of type 2 diabetes, traditionally viewed as an adult disease, is increasing at alarming rates in children, paralleling the rise in childhood obesity. As the rates of diabetes increase in children, accurate population-based assessment of disease burden is important for those implementing strategies for health services delivery. Health administrative data are a powerful tool that can be used to track disease burden, health services use, and health outcomes. Case validation is essential in ensuring accurate disease identification using administrative databases.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
The aim of our study was to define and validate a pediatric diabetes case ascertainment algorithm (including any form of childhood-onset diabetes) using health administrative data.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a two-stage method using linked health administrative data and data extracted from charts. In stage 1, we linked chart data from a large urban region to health administrative data and compared the diagnostic accuracy of various algorithms. We selected those that performed the best to be validated in stage 2. In stage 2, the most accurate algorithms were validated with chart data within two other geographic areas in the province of Quebec.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Accurate identification of diabetes in children (ages ≤15 years) required four physician claims or one hospitalization (with International Classification of Disease codes within 1 year (sensitivity 91.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 89.2-92.9]; positive predictive value [PPV] 93.5%, 95% CI 91.7-95.0) or using only four physician claims in 2 years (sensitivity 90.4%, 95% CI 88.3-92.2; PPV 93.2%, 95% CI 91.7-95.0). Separating the physician claims by 30 days increased the PPV of all algorithms tested.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with child-onset diabetes can be accurately identified within health administrative databases providing a valid source of information for health care resource planning and evaluation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31572014
doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S217969
pii: 217969
pmc: PMC6750203
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
833-843Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2019 Nakhla et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Laurent Legault has served on advisory boards for Medtronic and Lilly; has received grants for unrelated research from Merck, Sanofi and AstraZeneca; and holds a share of intellectual property not related to this work. No competing interests were declared by any other authors in this work.
Références
Biometrics. 2007 Mar;63(1):272-9
pubmed: 17447953
Gut. 2009 Nov;58(11):1490-7
pubmed: 19651626
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;67(8):887-96
pubmed: 24774473
Diabetes Care. 2010 Apr;33(4):786-91
pubmed: 20067956
Diabetes Care. 2005 Oct;28(10):2384-7
pubmed: 16186267
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 06;12(10):e1001885
pubmed: 26440803
Diabetes Care. 2011 Apr;34(4):898-903
pubmed: 21378211
Pediatr Diabetes. 2010 Mar;11(2):122-8
pubmed: 19500278
J Rheumatol. 2013 Aug;40(8):1334-6
pubmed: 23772078
Diabetes Care. 2013 Oct;36(10):3002-8
pubmed: 23656982
Diabet Med. 2011 Apr;28(4):424-7
pubmed: 21392063
Can J Diabetes. 2013 Apr;37 Suppl 1:S4-7
pubmed: 24070961
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;64(8):821-9
pubmed: 21194889
J Rheumatol. 2019 Mar 15;:null
pubmed: 30877218
Biometrics. 2004 Jun;60(2):388-97
pubmed: 15180664
Arch Dis Child. 1999 Oct;81(4):318-23
pubmed: 10490436
J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(9):923-37
pubmed: 3054000
Lancet. 2009 Jun 13;373(9680):2027-33
pubmed: 19481249
BMJ. 2010 Aug 19;341:c4226
pubmed: 20724404