Correlations between patient-reported outcomes and self-reported characteristics in adults with hemophilia B and caregivers of children with hemophilia B: analysis of the B-HERO-S study.
anxiety
depression
employment
health-related quality of life
relationships
Journal
Patient related outcome measures
ISSN: 1179-271X
Titre abrégé: Patient Relat Outcome Meas
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101551170
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
12
06
2019
accepted:
19
08
2019
entrez:
2
10
2019
pubmed:
2
10
2019
medline:
2
10
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pain, anxiety, depression, and other aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important issues for people with hemophilia and caregivers of children with hemophilia. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments may be used to assess aspects of HRQoL; however, the use of PROs in clinical management of patients with hemophilia is limited and inconsistent. The Bridging Hemophilia B Experiences, Results and Opportunities Into Solutions (B-HERO-S) study evaluated the impact of hemophilia B on HRQoL and other psychosocial aspects in affected adults and caregivers of children with hemophilia B. This post hoc analysis assessed correlations between PRO scores and psychosocial questions commonly asked in comprehensive care settings among B-HERO-S respondents. B-HERO-S consisted of two online surveys, one administered to adults with hemophilia B (n=299) and one administered to caregivers of children with hemophilia B (n=150). The adult survey included EQ-5D-5L with visual analog scale, BPI, HAL, and PHQ-9. The caregiver survey included PHQ-9 and GAD-7. Questions related to demographics, hemophilia treatment, and psychosocial questions asked in comprehensive care visits were also included in the surveys. A post hoc analysis was performed to assess correlations between responses to selected psychosocial questions with PRO scores. For adults with hemophilia B, greater pain severity and pain interference scores were associated with work-related problems, functional limitations, and relationship, psychological, and treatment issues. Significant correlations were also noted between some of these psychosocial outcomes and depressive symptoms. For caregivers, greater depression and anxiety were associated with employment issues, their child's functional, relationship, and psychological issues, having had difficulty or concerns with treatment/factor availability or affordability, and having less frequent HTC visits. High correlations were observed between PRO scores measuring pain, depression, and anxiety and questions commonly used in the comprehensive care setting to assess the psychosocial impact of hemophilia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31572035
doi: 10.2147/PROM.S219166
pii: 219166
pmc: PMC6755243
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
299-314Informations de copyright
© 2019 Buckner et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
T. Buckner has served on advisory boards with CSL Behring, Genentech, Novo Nordisk, Kedrion, Tremeau Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Pfizer, Spark Therapeutics, and Shire and as a consultant for Uniqure. R. Sidonio has received grant support from Grifols/Kedrion, Genentech, Bioverativ (Sanofi) and Shire and has participated in advisory boards with Genentech, Shire, Biogen, CSL Behring, Aptevo, Bayer, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, and Pfizer. M. Witkop has received grant funding from Pfizer, serves on advisory boards with Aptevo, Baxter Bioscience, Biogen Idec, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, and Pfizer, and is on the Novo Nordisk Speakers Bureau. C. Guelcher has served on or is serving on nursing advisory boards with Biogen Idec, Baxter/Baxalta, Grifols, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Octapharma and is on the Novo Nordisk Speakers Bureau and the Solution Sight Speakers Bureau. S. Cutter has received honoraria from Novo Nordisk and Pfizer. N. Iyer and D. Cooper are employees of Novo Nordisk Inc. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7
pubmed: 16717171
Haemophilia. 2013 Jan;19(1):e1-47
pubmed: 22776238
Blood Adv. 2018 Aug 28;2(16):2136-2144
pubmed: 30143528
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Oct 29;9:1549-60
pubmed: 26604708
Haemophilia. 2018 Mar;24(2):261-270
pubmed: 29218759
Blood. 2006 Jul 1;108(1):52-6
pubmed: 16551972
J Comorb. 2011 Dec 27;1:51-59
pubmed: 29090136
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2015 Nov 16;10:28915
pubmed: 26578360
Haemophilia. 2016 Jul;22(4):e320-2
pubmed: 27170451
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Jul;14 Suppl 1:S1-3
pubmed: 23900659
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 May 09;12:361-375
pubmed: 31190855
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Oct 11;11:1745-1753
pubmed: 29066870
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004 Jul-Aug;12(4):234-45
pubmed: 15473675
Eur J Haematol. 2018 Apr;100 Suppl 1:5-13
pubmed: 29498784
Eur J Haematol. 2017 Apr;98 Suppl 86:5-17
pubmed: 28319338
Haemophilia. 2012 May;18(3):e101-14
pubmed: 22059839
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Aug 09;11:1369-1380
pubmed: 28860720
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Sep 19;11:1603-1612
pubmed: 29033549
Value Health. 2012 Sep-Oct;15(6):916-25
pubmed: 22999142
Eur J Haematol. 2018 Jun;100(6):592-602
pubmed: 29505680
Haemophilia. 2014 Jan;20(1):44-51
pubmed: 23902228
Haemophilia. 2017 Jul;23(4):556-565
pubmed: 28419637
Haemophilia. 2011 Jan;17(1):41-4
pubmed: 20825504
Haemophilia. 2006 Jan;12(1):36-46
pubmed: 16409173
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941
Eur J Haematol. 2018 Apr;100 Suppl 1:25-33
pubmed: 29498782
Haemophilia. 2014 Jul;20(4):e287-95
pubmed: 24800872
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
pubmed: 19565683