The Internet Intervention Patient Adherence Scale for Guided Internet-Delivered Behavioral Interventions: Development and Psychometric Evaluation.


Journal

Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 10 2019
Historique:
received: 08 02 2019
accepted: 29 06 2019
revised: 06 06 2019
entrez: 2 10 2019
pubmed: 2 10 2019
medline: 12 6 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Patient adherence is defined as the extent to which a patient complies with medical or health advice. At present, there is a lack of reliable and valid measures specifically designed to measure adherence to internet-delivered behavioral interventions. The objective of this study was to develop and psychometrically evaluate a novel measure of adherence to guided internet-delivered behavioral interventions. In collaboration with experienced clinicians and researchers in the field, a 5-item, clinician-rated internet intervention Patient Adherence Scale (iiPAS) was developed. The initial scale was tested in a sample of children and adolescents (N=50) participating in internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) studies. A revised version of the iiPAS was then administered to a larger sample of children and adolescents (N=148) with various behavioral problems participating in ICBT trials. The scale was evaluated according to a classical test theory framework. The iiPAS demonstrated excellent internal consistency. Factor analyses revealed one underlying factor, explaining about 80% of the variance, suggesting that the scale captures a homogeneous adherence construct. The iiPAS was strongly associated with objective measures of patient activity in ICBT (number of logins, number of written characters, and completed modules). Furthermore, mid- and posttreatment ratings of the iiPAS were significantly correlated with treatment outcomes. By contrast, objective measures of patient activity in the Web-based platform did not correlate with treatment outcomes. The iiPAS could be a useful tool to measure adherence in a broad range of internet-delivered behavioral interventions.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Patient adherence is defined as the extent to which a patient complies with medical or health advice. At present, there is a lack of reliable and valid measures specifically designed to measure adherence to internet-delivered behavioral interventions.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to develop and psychometrically evaluate a novel measure of adherence to guided internet-delivered behavioral interventions.
METHODS
In collaboration with experienced clinicians and researchers in the field, a 5-item, clinician-rated internet intervention Patient Adherence Scale (iiPAS) was developed. The initial scale was tested in a sample of children and adolescents (N=50) participating in internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) studies. A revised version of the iiPAS was then administered to a larger sample of children and adolescents (N=148) with various behavioral problems participating in ICBT trials. The scale was evaluated according to a classical test theory framework.
RESULTS
The iiPAS demonstrated excellent internal consistency. Factor analyses revealed one underlying factor, explaining about 80% of the variance, suggesting that the scale captures a homogeneous adherence construct. The iiPAS was strongly associated with objective measures of patient activity in ICBT (number of logins, number of written characters, and completed modules). Furthermore, mid- and posttreatment ratings of the iiPAS were significantly correlated with treatment outcomes. By contrast, objective measures of patient activity in the Web-based platform did not correlate with treatment outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
The iiPAS could be a useful tool to measure adherence in a broad range of internet-delivered behavioral interventions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31573901
pii: v21i10e13602
doi: 10.2196/13602
pmc: PMC6774571
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e13602

Informations de copyright

©Fabian Lenhard, Kajsa Mitsell, Maral Jolstedt, Sarah Vigerland, Tove Wahlund, Martina Nord, Johan Bjureberg, Hanna Sahlin, Per Andrén, Kristina Aspvall, Karin Melin, David Mataix-Cols, Eva Serlachius, Jens Högström. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 01.10.2019.

Références

Behav Res Ther. 2009 Mar;47(3):175-80
pubmed: 19230862
Med Care. 2002 Sep;40(9):794-811
pubmed: 12218770
BJPsych Open. 2018 Apr 18;4(3):106-112
pubmed: 29971153
Behav Ther. 2016 Sep;47(5):755-772
pubmed: 27816086
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Jan;76:47-56
pubmed: 26649465
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018 Nov;2(11):792-801
pubmed: 30241993
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Apr;55(513):305-12
pubmed: 15826439
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;71(3):313-26
pubmed: 20331933
Cogn Behav Ther. 2015;44(1):44-53
pubmed: 25277366
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019;48(sup1):S215-S226
pubmed: 28448176
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;40(8):937-44
pubmed: 11501694
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 14;7(12):e018345
pubmed: 29247101
J Clin Psychol. 2011 Feb;67(2):133-42
pubmed: 21108314
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012 Dec;12(6):745-64
pubmed: 23252357
Cognit Ther Res. 2010 Oct;34(5):429-438
pubmed: 20930925
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Jun;68(3):438-50
pubmed: 10883561
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 14;14(6):e152
pubmed: 23151820
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;73(9):1265-6
pubmed: 23059155
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Aug;81(4):639-649
pubmed: 23750465
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Aug 05;13(3):e52
pubmed: 21821503
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 06;19(12):e402
pubmed: 29212630
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):326
pubmed: 30305103
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Apr;79(2):247-252
pubmed: 21355639
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Mar 31;7(1):e11
pubmed: 15829473
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 15;9(2):e024685
pubmed: 30772854
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;56(1):10-19.e2
pubmed: 27993223
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Dec;77(6):1179-84
pubmed: 19968393
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Dec;14(6):979-83
pubmed: 18462279
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2005 Jun;8(2):149-66
pubmed: 15984084
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Oct;69(5):814-24
pubmed: 11680558
Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Dec;50:1-10
pubmed: 27668988
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997 Jun;36(6):844-52
pubmed: 9183141

Auteurs

Fabian Lenhard (F)

Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.

Kajsa Mitsell (K)

Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.

Maral Jolstedt (M)

Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.

Sarah Vigerland (S)

Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.

Tove Wahlund (T)

Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.

Martina Nord (M)

Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.

Johan Bjureberg (J)

Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.

Hanna Sahlin (H)

Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.

Per Andrén (P)

Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.

Kristina Aspvall (K)

Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.

Karin Melin (K)

Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

David Mataix-Cols (D)

Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.

Eva Serlachius (E)

Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.

Jens Högström (J)

Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH