Paper-Based Versus Web-Based Versions of Self-Administered Questionnaires, Including Food-Frequency Questionnaires: Prospective Cohort Study.
cohort studies
epidemiologic studies
surveys and questionnaires
Journal
JMIR public health and surveillance
ISSN: 2369-2960
Titre abrégé: JMIR Public Health Surveill
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101669345
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Oct 2019
01 Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
21
08
2018
accepted:
10
05
2019
revised:
17
01
2019
entrez:
2
10
2019
pubmed:
2
10
2019
medline:
2
10
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Web-based questionnaires allow collecting data quickly, with minimal costs from large sample groups and through Web-based self-administered forms. Until recently, there has been a lack of evidence from large-scale epidemiological studies and nutrition surveys that have evaluated the comparison between traditional and new technologies to measure dietary intake. This study aimed to compare results from the general baseline questionnaire (Q_0) and the 10-year follow-up questionnaire (Q_10) in the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra (SUN) prospective cohort, obtained from different subjects, some of whom used a paper-based version, and others used a Web-based version. Both baseline and 10-year assessments included a validated 136-item semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ), used to collect dietary intake. The SUN project is a prospective cohort study (with continuous open recruitment and many participants who were recently recruited). All participants were university graduates. Participants who completed the validated FFQ at baseline (FFQ_0, n=22,564) were selected. The variables analyzed were classified into 6 groups of questions: (1) FFQ (136 items), (2) healthy eating attitudes (10 items), (3) alcohol consumption (3 items), (4) physical activity during leisure time (17 items), (5) other activities (24 items), and (6) personality traits (3 items). Multiple linear and logistic regression models were used to assess the adjusted differences between the mean number of missing values and the risk of having apparently incorrect values for FFQ items or mismatches and inconsistencies in dietary variables. Only 1.5% (339/22564) and 60.71% (6765/11144) participants reported their information using the Web-based version for Q_0 and Q_10, respectively, and 51.40 % (11598/22564) and 100.00% (11144/11144) of participants who completed the Q_0 and Q_10, respectively, had the option of choosing the Web-based version. Sociodemographic, lifestyle, health characteristics, food consumption, and energy and nutrient intakes were similar among participants, according to the type of questionnaire used in Q_10. Less than 0.5% of values were missing for items related to healthy eating attitudes, alcohol consumption, and personality traits in the Web-based questionnaires. The proportion of missing data in FFQ, leisure time physical activity, and other activities was higher in paper-based questionnaires than Web-based questionnaires. In Web-based questionnaires, a high degree of internal consistency was found when comparing answers that should not be contradictory, such as the frequency of fruit as dessert versus total fruit consumption and the frequency of fried food consumptions versus oil consumption. Incorporating a Web-based version for a baseline and 10-year questionnaire has not implicated a loss of data quality in this cohort of highly educated adults. Younger participants showed greater preference for Web-based questionnaires. Web-based questionnaires were filled out to a greater extent and with less missing items than paper-based questionnaires. Further research is needed to optimize data collection and response rate in Web-based questionnaires.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Web-based questionnaires allow collecting data quickly, with minimal costs from large sample groups and through Web-based self-administered forms. Until recently, there has been a lack of evidence from large-scale epidemiological studies and nutrition surveys that have evaluated the comparison between traditional and new technologies to measure dietary intake.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to compare results from the general baseline questionnaire (Q_0) and the 10-year follow-up questionnaire (Q_10) in the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra (SUN) prospective cohort, obtained from different subjects, some of whom used a paper-based version, and others used a Web-based version. Both baseline and 10-year assessments included a validated 136-item semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ), used to collect dietary intake.
METHODS
METHODS
The SUN project is a prospective cohort study (with continuous open recruitment and many participants who were recently recruited). All participants were university graduates. Participants who completed the validated FFQ at baseline (FFQ_0, n=22,564) were selected. The variables analyzed were classified into 6 groups of questions: (1) FFQ (136 items), (2) healthy eating attitudes (10 items), (3) alcohol consumption (3 items), (4) physical activity during leisure time (17 items), (5) other activities (24 items), and (6) personality traits (3 items). Multiple linear and logistic regression models were used to assess the adjusted differences between the mean number of missing values and the risk of having apparently incorrect values for FFQ items or mismatches and inconsistencies in dietary variables.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Only 1.5% (339/22564) and 60.71% (6765/11144) participants reported their information using the Web-based version for Q_0 and Q_10, respectively, and 51.40 % (11598/22564) and 100.00% (11144/11144) of participants who completed the Q_0 and Q_10, respectively, had the option of choosing the Web-based version. Sociodemographic, lifestyle, health characteristics, food consumption, and energy and nutrient intakes were similar among participants, according to the type of questionnaire used in Q_10. Less than 0.5% of values were missing for items related to healthy eating attitudes, alcohol consumption, and personality traits in the Web-based questionnaires. The proportion of missing data in FFQ, leisure time physical activity, and other activities was higher in paper-based questionnaires than Web-based questionnaires. In Web-based questionnaires, a high degree of internal consistency was found when comparing answers that should not be contradictory, such as the frequency of fruit as dessert versus total fruit consumption and the frequency of fried food consumptions versus oil consumption.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Incorporating a Web-based version for a baseline and 10-year questionnaire has not implicated a loss of data quality in this cohort of highly educated adults. Younger participants showed greater preference for Web-based questionnaires. Web-based questionnaires were filled out to a greater extent and with less missing items than paper-based questionnaires. Further research is needed to optimize data collection and response rate in Web-based questionnaires.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31573924
pii: v5i4e11997
doi: 10.2196/11997
pmc: PMC6774237
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e11997Informations de copyright
©Itziar Zazpe, Susana Santiago, Carmen De la Fuente-Arrillaga, Jorge Nuñez-Córdoba, Maira Bes-Rastrollo, Miguel Angel Martínez-González. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (http://publichealth.jmir.org), 01.10.2019.
Références
Br J Nutr. 2010 Jun;103(12):1808-16
pubmed: 20102675
Proc Nutr Soc. 2017 Aug;76(3):213-219
pubmed: 28162110
Epidemiol Health. 2014 Jul 22;36:e2014009
pubmed: 25078382
Nutrients. 2018 Mar 31;10(4):null
pubmed: 29614726
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Jun;14(6):1055-63
pubmed: 21385523
J Med Internet Res. 2002 Apr-Nov;4(2):E13
pubmed: 12554560
Eur J Epidemiol. 2010 May;25(5):287-96
pubmed: 20191377
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2017 Aug;68(5):595-604
pubmed: 28029068
Eval Rev. 2009 Oct;33(5):464-80
pubmed: 19605623
Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Aug;41(4):1187-203
pubmed: 22933652
Prev Med. 2012 Dec;55(6):544-5
pubmed: 23010436
Nutr Hosp. 2011 Nov-Dec;26(6):1378-84
pubmed: 22411386
Proc Nutr Soc. 2017 Aug;76(3):173-174
pubmed: 28514985
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 23;20(1):e24
pubmed: 29362206
Qual Life Res. 2015 Aug;24(8):1949-61
pubmed: 25702266
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Apr;19(6):1027-34
pubmed: 26235206
Eur J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;28(2):189-97
pubmed: 23435790
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Oct 07;13:167
pubmed: 26446159
Nutrients. 2017 Feb 13;9(2):null
pubmed: 28208819
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013 May;67(5):424-9
pubmed: 23443832
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 21;378(25):e34
pubmed: 29897866
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2015 Jul;29(4):360-71
pubmed: 26111445
Int J Epidemiol. 1993 Jun;22(3):512-9
pubmed: 8359969
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Dec 1;166(11):1345-54
pubmed: 17728269
F1000Res. 2017 Jun 16;6:926
pubmed: 28690835
Br J Nutr. 2011 Apr;105(7):1055-64
pubmed: 21080983
Ann Nutr Metab. 2014;64(2):156-66
pubmed: 25116257
J Am Coll Nutr. 2017 Jul;36(5):319-329
pubmed: 28506187
Public Health Nutr. 2005 Oct;8(7):920-7
pubmed: 16277809
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Dec 1;172(11):1292-8
pubmed: 20880962
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 01;19(3):e58
pubmed: 28249833
Value Health. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):322-33
pubmed: 18380645
Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;38(4):938-43
pubmed: 18782897
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016 Oct 18;2(2):e160
pubmed: 27756715
Br J Nutr. 2009 Jul;101 Suppl 2:S102-12
pubmed: 19594959
Int J Public Health. 2011 Aug;56(4):407-17
pubmed: 21538094
J Nutr Sci. 2018 Apr 2;7:e11
pubmed: 29686860