Disease burden and cost of hidradenitis suppurativa: a retrospective examination of US administrative claims data.
comorbidity
hidradenitis suppurativa
prevalence
resource utilization
treatments
tumor necrosis factor inhibitors
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 09 2019
30 09 2019
Historique:
entrez:
3
10
2019
pubmed:
3
10
2019
medline:
2
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) causes substantial morbidity and quality-of-life impairment. We examined demographic/clinical characteristics of patients with HS and treatment patterns, prevalence and healthcare resource utilisation/expenditures related to HS in the real-world. Retrospective claims data of MarketScan Commercial, Medicare Supplemental and Medicaid databases (2009-2014). USA. Patients aged ≥12 years with ≥3 non-diagnostic outpatient or inpatient claims with an HS diagnosis code and ≥12 months continuous enrolment with medical and pharmacy benefits before (preindex) and after (postindex) the earliest diagnosis of HS (index) were included. There were 11 325 Commercial/Medicare patients (mean age 37.4 years) and 5164 Medicaid patients (mean age 28.3 years). HS was more common in Medicaid than Commercial/Medicare patients (0.301% and 0.098%, respectively, in 2014). Cellulitis and psychiatric disorders were the most common comorbidities and oral antibiotics and narcotics were the most frequently prescribed drugs preindex, with ≥10% increase postindex in both populations. HS-related inpatient costs decreased while outpatient costs increased from preindex to postindex. Medicaid patients had several risk factors that may be associated with poor outcomes (eg, high rates of prescription pain medication use, comorbidities, drug discontinuation/interruption/holiday, emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalisation). Commercial/Medicare and Medicaid HS beneficiaries experience high comorbidity burden but use different treatment modalities to manage HS. Results suggest a substantial unmet need exists among this patient population, with Medicaid patients experiencing a particularly high burden of disease and expensive healthcare resource utilisation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31575575
pii: bmjopen-2019-030579
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030579
pmc: PMC6797383
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e030579Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: AK has received honoraria as a consultant for AbbVie and Novartis; and received grants and/or funding for research or a fellowship programme from AbbVie and Janssen. JM is an employee of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. AS-N is an employee of IBM Watson Health. AV and TW were employees of IBM Watson Health at the time the study was conducted.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):158-64
pubmed: 22236226
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):422-34
pubmed: 27518661
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Dec;22(12):1385-1391
pubmed: 27882831
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Apr;29(4):619-44
pubmed: 25640693
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Nov;69(5):818-819
pubmed: 24124816
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Oct;73(4):609-14
pubmed: 26190241
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Jun 15;179(12):1477-83
pubmed: 24812161
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Feb;29(2):371-6
pubmed: 24909646
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Apr;56(4):621-3
pubmed: 17097366
Health Serv Res. 2008 Aug;43(4):1424-41
pubmed: 18756617
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996 Aug;35(2 Pt 1):191-4
pubmed: 8708018
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Jun 15;13:103
pubmed: 22703603
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2016 Sep;17(3):343-351
pubmed: 26831295
Skin Appendage Disord. 2015 Sep;1(2):65-73
pubmed: 27172455
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 Oct;59(4):596-601
pubmed: 18674845
J Med Econ. 2016 Jul;19(7):710-7
pubmed: 26938967
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2015 May;39(4):434-42
pubmed: 25079971
Acta Derm Venereol. 2015 Nov;95(8):990-1
pubmed: 26073615
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Dec;71(6):1144-50
pubmed: 25440440
JAMA Dermatol. 2014 Sep;150(9):937-44
pubmed: 24908260
Dermatol Clin. 2016 Jan;34(1):1-5
pubmed: 26617351
J Invest Dermatol. 2014 Nov;134(11):2842-2843
pubmed: 24820891
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2019 May;110(4):297-302
pubmed: 30885385
Epidemiol Infect. 2006 Apr;134(2):293-9
pubmed: 16490133
Dermatol Clin. 2016 Jan;34(1):7-16
pubmed: 26617352
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(8):2460-7
pubmed: 25424956
Br J Dermatol. 2014 Aug;171(2):338-42
pubmed: 24712395
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Mar;68(3):412-9
pubmed: 22921795
JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Aug 1;153(8):760-764
pubmed: 28492923
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Nov;73(5 Suppl 1):S27-35
pubmed: 26470611