An Experimental Slope Method for a More Accurate Measurement of Relative Radiation Doses using Radiographic and Radiochromic Films and Its Application to Megavoltage Small-Field Dosimetry.
CyberKnife
EBT3 film
EDR2 film
Percentage depth dose
film slope method
relative dosimetry
relative output factor
small-field dosimetry
Journal
Journal of medical physics
ISSN: 0971-6203
Titre abrégé: J Med Phys
Pays: India
ID NLM: 9441104
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
3
10
2019
pubmed:
3
10
2019
medline:
3
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
An experimental method using the linear portion of the relative film dose-response curve for radiographic and radiochromic films is presented, which can be used to determine the relative depth doses in a variety of very small, medium, and large radiation fields and relative output factors (ROFs) for small fields. The film slope (FS) method was successfully applied to obtain the percentage depth doses (PDDs) for external beams of photon and electrons from a Synergy linear accelerator (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) under reference conditions of 10 cm × 10 cm for photon beam and nominal 10 cm × 10 cm size applicator for electron beam. For small-field dosimetry, the FS method was applied to EDR2 films (Carestream Health, Rochester, NY) for 6 MV photon beam from a linac (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) and small, circular radiosurgery cones (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) with diameters of 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, and 15 mm. The ROFs for all these cones and central axis PDDs for 5, 10, and 15 mm diameter cones were determined at source-to-surface distance of 100 cm. The ROFs for small fields of CyberKnife system were determined using this technique with Gafchromic EBT3 film (Ashland, NJ, USA). The PDDs and ROFs were compared with ion chamber (IC) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulated values. The maximum percentage deviation of PDD The authors have developed a novel and more accurate method for the relative dosimetry of photon and electron beams. This offers a unique method to determine PDD and ROF with a high spatial resolution in fields of steep dose gradient, especially in small fields.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31576063
doi: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_17_19
pii: JMP-44-145
pmc: PMC6764177
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
145-155Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Medical Physics.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
Med Phys. 2006 Dec;33(12):4551-6
pubmed: 17278806
Med Phys. 2007 Jun;34(6):2228-58
pubmed: 17654924
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Mar 21;59(6):N11-7
pubmed: 24594929
Med Phys. 2003 Feb;30(2):111-8
pubmed: 12607827
Med Phys. 2010 Feb;37(2):571-6
pubmed: 20229865
Phys Med Biol. 1996 Sep;41(9):1531-80
pubmed: 8884898
Med Phys. 1983 Nov-Dec;10(6):741-71
pubmed: 6419029
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Jan 08;17(1):360-373
pubmed: 26894368
Med Phys. 2016 Aug;43(8):4687
pubmed: 27487885
Med Phys. 2003 Sep;30(9):2455-64
pubmed: 14528967
Med Phys. 1999 Sep;26(9):1847-70
pubmed: 10505874
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Nov 7;50(21):N317-21
pubmed: 16237231
Med Phys. 2012 Oct;39(10):6339-50
pubmed: 23039670
Med Phys. 1995 Jun;22(6):793-8
pubmed: 7565368
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013 Mar 04;14(2):4111
pubmed: 23470940
Med Phys. 1995 Dec;22(12):2065-74
pubmed: 8746712
Phys Med Biol. 1995 Jun;40(6):1127-34
pubmed: 7659734
Med Phys. 1994 Jan;21(1):65-8
pubmed: 8164590
Med Phys. 2008 Oct;35(10):4671-84
pubmed: 18975713
Med Phys. 2012 Aug;39(8):4850-7
pubmed: 22894411
Med Phys. 2000 Mar;27(3):472-7
pubmed: 10757599
Med Phys. 2003 Mar;30(3):341-7
pubmed: 12674234
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part11):3724
pubmed: 28517140
Med Phys. 1994 Mar;21(3):389-92
pubmed: 8208213
J Med Phys. 2015 Apr-Jun;40(2):61-7
pubmed: 26170551