Are we Justified Doing Routine Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Nonmale Factor Infertility? A Retrospective Study Comparing Reproductive Outcomes between
ICSI
IVF
nonmale factor infertility
Journal
Journal of human reproductive sciences
ISSN: 0974-1208
Titre abrégé: J Hum Reprod Sci
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101473512
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
3
10
2019
pubmed:
3
10
2019
medline:
3
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Intracytoplasmic sperm insemination (ICSI) came into use in 1992 to improve fertilization in couples with male factor infertility undergoing This is a retrospective single centre study undertaken at a private IVF center. A total of 350 patients with normal male factor were included in the study of which 186 underwent conventional IVF and 134 were subjected to ICSI. They were then compared for various reproductive parameters with Live Birth Rate (LBR) being the primary outcome. Fertilization rates (89.99% vs 85.1%), Blastocyst formation rates (62.86% vs 50.61%) and clinical pregnancy rates (37.85% vs 32.35%) were found to be higher in the IVF group compared to the ICSI group though not statistically significant. The live birth rates in the IVF group was also higher than the ICSI group (32.71% vs 24.26%). IVF edged over ICSI in all aspects resulting in better clinical outcome with higher take home babies in non-male factor infertility. Our results show that routine ICSI should not be used as a blanket therapy for all cases in ART.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31576078
doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_8_19
pii: JHRS-12-210
pmc: PMC6764219
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
210-215Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
Fertil Steril. 2008 Feb;89(2):331-41
pubmed: 17662286
Fertil Steril. 2012 Dec;98(6):1395-9
pubmed: 22981171
Fertil Steril. 1999 Dec;72(6):1041-4
pubmed: 10593378
Hum Reprod. 2016 Dec;31(12):2750-2755
pubmed: 27738114
Lancet. 2001 Jun 30;357(9274):2075-9
pubmed: 11445099
JAMA. 2015 Jan 20;313(3):255-63
pubmed: 25602996
Hum Reprod Update. 2004 Jan-Feb;10(1):19-28
pubmed: 15005461
Hum Reprod. 2017 Oct 1;32(10):1957-1973
pubmed: 29117383
Hum Reprod. 1998 Aug;13(8):2126-9
pubmed: 9756282
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jun;11(3):307-11
pubmed: 10369209
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 10;366(19):1803-13
pubmed: 22559061
Fertil Steril. 2009 Nov;92(5):1557-61
pubmed: 18973885
Hum Reprod. 2016 Jul;31(7):1381-2
pubmed: 27207176
Hum Reprod. 2004 Feb;19(2):223-7
pubmed: 14747158
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001 Aug;18(8):426-35
pubmed: 11599463
Fertil Steril. 2000 Jan;73(1):38-42
pubmed: 10632409
Fertil Steril. 2007 Sep;88(3):622-8
pubmed: 17445809
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001 Dec;18(12):623-8
pubmed: 11808841
Hum Reprod. 1999 Jan;14(1):65-9
pubmed: 10374096
Hum Reprod. 2017 Jan;32(1):119-124
pubmed: 27852688
Fertil Steril. 1997 Jul;68(1):171-3
pubmed: 9207606
Fertil Steril. 2006 Jun;85(6):1736-43
pubmed: 16678177
Hum Reprod. 2018 Jul 1;33(7):1322-1330
pubmed: 29897449
Fertil Steril. 2005 Sep;84(3):611-7
pubmed: 16169393
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2008 Sep;11(3):131-46
pubmed: 18766953
Hum Reprod. 2016 Jul;31(7):1588-609
pubmed: 27207175
Lancet. 1992 Jul 4;340(8810):17-8
pubmed: 1351601
Fertil Steril. 1996 Nov;66(5):753-6
pubmed: 8893679