Tumor Mutational Burden as a Predictive Biomarker for Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review of Current Evidence.
Antibodies/therapeutic use
DNA
DNA mutational analysis
Genes
Neoplasm
Programmed cell death 1 receptor
Sequence analysis
Journal
The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2020
01 2020
Historique:
received:
29
03
2019
accepted:
09
08
2019
pubmed:
4
10
2019
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
4
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) extends survival in a proportion of patients across multiple cancers. Tumor mutational burden (TMB)-the number of somatic mutations per DNA megabase (Mb)-has emerged as a proxy for neoantigen burden that is an independent biomarker associated with ICPI outcomes. Based on findings from recent studies, TMB can be reliably estimated using validated algorithms from next-generation sequencing assays that interrogate a sufficiently large subset of the exome as an alternative to whole-exome sequencing. Biological processes contributing to elevated TMB can result from exposure to cigarette smoke and ultraviolet radiation, from deleterious mutations in mismatch repair leading to microsatellite instability, or from mutations in the DNA repair machinery. A variety of clinical studies have shown that patients with higher TMB experience longer survival and greater response rates following treatment with ICPIs compared with those who have lower TMB levels; this includes a prospective randomized clinical trial that found a TMB threshold of ≥10 mutations per Mb to be predictive of longer progression-free survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Multiple trials are underway to validate the predictive values of TMB across cancer types and in patients treated with other immunotherapies. Here we review the rationale, algorithm development methodology, and existing clinical data supporting the use of TMB as a predictive biomarker for treatment with ICPIs. We discuss emerging roles for TMB and its potential future value for stratifying patients according to their likelihood of ICPI treatment response. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a newly established independent predictor of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPI) treatment outcome across multiple tumor types. Certain next-generation sequencing-based techniques allow TMB to be reliably estimated from a subset of the exome without the use of whole-exome sequencing, thus facilitating the adoption of TMB assessment in community oncology settings. Analyses of multiple clinical trials across several cancer types have demonstrated that TMB stratifies patients who are receiving ICPIs by response rate and survival. TMB, alongside other genomic biomarkers, may provide complementary information in selecting patients for ICPI-based therapies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31578273
pii: theoncologist.2019-0244
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0244
pmc: PMC6964127
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e147-e159Informations de copyright
© AlphaMed Press 2019.
Références
Cancer Lett. 2018 Feb 1;414:166-173
pubmed: 29155348
Cancer Immunol Res. 2016 Nov;4(11):959-967
pubmed: 27671167
Nat Med. 2018 Sep;24(9):1441-1448
pubmed: 30082870
Nature. 2018 Jan 18;553(7688):347-350
pubmed: 29320474
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Feb;12(2):258-268
pubmed: 27865871
Cell. 2017 Nov 16;171(5):1042-1056.e10
pubmed: 29056344
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;36(7):633-641
pubmed: 29337640
Mol Cancer Ther. 2017 Nov;16(11):2598-2608
pubmed: 28835386
Nature. 2018 Feb 22;554(7693):544-548
pubmed: 29443960
Oncotarget. 2017 Dec 15;9(8):7949-7960
pubmed: 29487705
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Dec 1;36(34):3353-3360
pubmed: 30343614
Oncologist. 2019 Jun;24(6):820-828
pubmed: 30867242
N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 4;371(23):2189-2199
pubmed: 25409260
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Nov;31(11):1023-31
pubmed: 24142049
Cell. 2017 Nov 2;171(4):934-949.e16
pubmed: 29033130
Nat Rev Cancer. 2016 May;16(5):275-87
pubmed: 27079802
Cancer Discov. 2018 Jul;8(7):822-835
pubmed: 29773717
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Sep 15;22(18):4585-93
pubmed: 27225694
Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):124-8
pubmed: 25765070
Science. 2015 Oct 9;350(6257):207-211
pubmed: 26359337
Lancet. 2016 May 7;387(10031):1909-20
pubmed: 26952546
Oncotarget. 2015 Oct 27;6(33):34221-7
pubmed: 26439694
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Feb;12(2):208-222
pubmed: 27913228
Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646-74
pubmed: 21376230
Nature. 2019 Jan;565(7738):234-239
pubmed: 30568305
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Feb;15(2):142-147
pubmed: 28188185
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2509-20
pubmed: 26028255
Nat Genet. 2018 Sep;50(9):1271-1281
pubmed: 30150660
Cancer Treat Rev. 2017 Mar;54:74-86
pubmed: 28231560
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 24;378(21):1976-1986
pubmed: 29658848
Nature. 2017 Jul 13;547(7662):217-221
pubmed: 28678778
Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Jul;48:61-8
pubmed: 27362548
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Oct 1;20(19):5064-74
pubmed: 24714771
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 1;36(16):1579-1587
pubmed: 29590008
Clin Lung Cancer. 2019 Mar;20(2):88-96.e6
pubmed: 30425022
Nat Med. 2017 Jun;23(6):703-713
pubmed: 28481359
Gene. 2018 Mar 20;647:31-38
pubmed: 29320758
J Exp Med. 2008 Apr 14;205(4):751-8
pubmed: 18362173
Science. 2016 Nov 4;354(6312):618-622
pubmed: 27811275
Genome Med. 2017 Apr 19;9(1):34
pubmed: 28420421
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018 Aug;9(4):610-617
pubmed: 30151257
Int J Cancer. 2019 Feb 15;144(4):848-858
pubmed: 30238975
Int J Cancer. 2019 May 1;144(9):2303-2312
pubmed: 30446996
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0176181
pubmed: 29121062
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):563-7
pubmed: 25428504
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Mar;8(1):
pubmed: 32217756
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 21;372(21):2018-28
pubmed: 25891174
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 10;37(14):1217-1227
pubmed: 30865548
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(52):e5539
pubmed: 28033249
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Dec;18(12):1600-1609
pubmed: 29129441
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2019 Aug;58(8):578-588
pubmed: 30664300
Mol Cancer Ther. 2015 Apr;14(4):847-56
pubmed: 25695955
Cell. 2015 Jun 18;161(7):1681-96
pubmed: 26091043
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Aug 1;23(15):4242-4250
pubmed: 28351930
Nat Med. 2018 May;24(5):556-562
pubmed: 29736026
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 31;378(22):2093-2104
pubmed: 29658845
JAMA Oncol. 2019 May 01;5(5):696-702
pubmed: 30816954
PLoS Med. 2017 May 26;14(5):e1002309
pubmed: 28552987
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 21;377(25):2500-2501
pubmed: 29262275
Cancer Cell. 2018 May 14;33(5):843-852.e4
pubmed: 29657128
Lancet. 2016 Apr 30;387(10030):1837-46
pubmed: 26970723
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 02;11(8):e0160485
pubmed: 27483468
Mol Oncol. 2015 May;9(5):960-6
pubmed: 25458054
Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):67-76
pubmed: 27939400
Exp Hematol Oncol. 2018 Nov 16;7:28
pubmed: 30473928
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 18;8(29):48248-48252
pubmed: 28525386
Cancer Cell. 2018 May 14;33(5):853-861.e4
pubmed: 29731394
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 22;376(25):2415-2426
pubmed: 28636851
Nat Genet. 2019 Feb;51(2):202-206
pubmed: 30643254
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 1;375(9):819-29
pubmed: 27433843
Science. 2017 Jul 28;357(6349):409-413
pubmed: 28596308
Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 15;77(18):4763-4772
pubmed: 28536279
J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Aug;13(8):1217-1221
pubmed: 29654927