Correlation between Skeletal Age and Metacarpal Bones and Metacarpophalangeal Joints Dimensions.
Dimensions
Metacarpal bones
Metacarpophalangeal joints
Skeletal age
Journal
Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)
ISSN: 2345-6485
Titre abrégé: J Dent (Shiraz)
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101615440
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
entrez:
4
10
2019
pubmed:
4
10
2019
medline:
4
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Currently, two major methods have been introduced for bone age assessment using left hand radiography. The first approach is Greulich and Pyle, which is very subjective. The second method is Tanner and Whitehouse, which is very time consuming and its morphological criteria are not quantitative, therefore it is hardly used. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between skeletal age and bone size and joint space measurements among Asian children using hand radiographs and using this correlation as an aid in determining bone age. In this analytic research, 304 hand radiographs from Asian children with normal development have been included in this study (155 female, 149 male). Two radiologists using Greulich and Pyle method assessed their bone ages. The 2nd-5th metacarpal bones length and width and 2nd-5th metacarpophalangeal joints width and length were manually measured by Adobe Photoshop and compared with subjects' skeletal age. Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship. Pearson correlation between bone age and metacarpal bones length was 0.902-0.938; metacarpal bones width was 0.452-0.850; metacarpophalangeal joints width was 0.656 - 0.811, and metacarpophalangeal joints length was 0.920 - 0.947. Regarding Pearson correlation, metacarpophalangeal joints length, metacarpal bones length, metacarpophalangeal joints width, and metacarpal bones width showed significant relationship with bone age, respectively. These measurements can be used as accessory criteria for bone age assessment using left hand radiography, to reduce inter-observer reading differences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31579689
doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.44904
pii: JDS-20-3
pmc: PMC6732183
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
159-164Informations de copyright
Copyright: © Journal of Dentistry Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
Références
Osteoporos Int. 2010 Aug;21(8):1391-400
pubmed: 19937229
Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1970 Mar;108(3):511-5
pubmed: 4313463
Medinfo. 1995;8 Pt 1:709-13
pubmed: 8591306
J Digit Imaging. 2001 Dec;14(4):165-72
pubmed: 11894888
Horm Res. 1994;42(6):288-94
pubmed: 7698726
J Digit Imaging. 2008 Oct;21 Suppl 1:104-12
pubmed: 17384977
Horm Res. 1994;42(6):282-7
pubmed: 7698725
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2007 Jun-Jul;31(4-5):322-31
pubmed: 17387000
Br J Radiol. 1994 Sep;67(801):848-51
pubmed: 7953224
Skeletal Radiol. 2007 Sep;36(9):853-64
pubmed: 17508211
Radiology. 1978 Dec;129(3):661-8
pubmed: 725041
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2000 Sep-Oct;24(5):297-307
pubmed: 10940607