Classification of neurons in the adult mouse cochlear nucleus: Linear discriminant analysis.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
16
07
2019
accepted:
13
09
2019
entrez:
4
10
2019
pubmed:
4
10
2019
medline:
12
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The cochlear nucleus (CN) transforms the spike trains of spiral ganglion cells into a set of sensory representations that are essential for auditory discriminations and perception. These transformations require the coordinated activity of different classes of neurons that are embryologically derived from distinct sets of precursors. Decades of investigation have shown that the neurons of the CN are differentiated by their morphology, neurotransmitter receptors, ion channel expression and intrinsic excitability. In the present study we have used linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to perform an unbiased analysis of measures of the responses of CN neurons to current injections to objectively categorize cells on the basis of both morphology and physiology. Recordings were made from cells in brain slices from CBA/CaJ mice and a transgenic mouse line, NF107, crossed against the Ai32 line. For each cell, responses to current injections were analyzed for spike rate, spike shape, input resistance, resting membrane potential, membrane time constant, hyperpolarization-activated sag and time constant. Cells were filled with dye for morphological classification, and visually classified according to published accounts. The different morphological classes of cells were separated with the LDA. Ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN) bushy cells, planar multipolar (T-stellate) cells, and radiate multipolar (D-stellate) cells were in separate clusters and separate from all of the neurons from the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN). Within the DCN, the pyramidal cells and tuberculoventral cells were largely separated from a distinct cluster of cartwheel cells. principal axes, whereas VCN cells were in 3 clouds approximately orthogonal to this plane. VCN neurons from the two mouse strains overlapped but were slightly separated, indicating either a strain dependence or differences in slice preparation methods. We conclude that cochlear nucleus neurons can be objectively distinguished based on their intrinsic electrical properties, but such distinctions are still best aided by morphological identification.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31581200
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223137
pii: PONE-D-19-19927
pmc: PMC6776397
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.8854352.v1']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0223137Subventions
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC004551
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R03 DC013396
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1183:221-42
pubmed: 25023312
J Neurosci. 1983 Oct;3(10):2043-53
pubmed: 6619923
Am J Anat. 1982 Feb;163(2):103-30
pubmed: 7072613
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jun;107(11):3008-19
pubmed: 22378165
Hear Res. 2000 Nov;149(1-2):91-105
pubmed: 11033249
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Apr;89(4):2225-37
pubmed: 12612001
J Comp Neurol. 1997 Aug 25;385(2):245-64
pubmed: 9268126
J Neurosci. 2014 Feb 5;34(6):2214-30
pubmed: 24501361
Neuroscience. 1982;7(12):3031-52
pubmed: 6298659
J Neurophysiol. 1994 Mar;71(3):914-30
pubmed: 8201432
J Neurosci. 2001 Sep 15;21(18):7372-83
pubmed: 11549747
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Jun;89(6):3070-82
pubmed: 12783951
Front Neuroinform. 2014 Jan 30;8:3
pubmed: 24523692
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Aug;106(2):630-40
pubmed: 21562186
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jun;97(6):4162-72
pubmed: 17442767
J Neurosci. 1999 Mar 15;19(6):2195-208
pubmed: 10066273
J Neurosci. 1984 Jun;4(6):1577-88
pubmed: 6726347
J Neurosci. 2013 Jan 23;33(4):1598-614
pubmed: 23345233
J Neurosci. 1990 Jul;10(7):2338-51
pubmed: 2376777
Brain Res Rev. 2011 Jan 7;66(1-2):220-45
pubmed: 20937306
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Jun;89(6):3097-113
pubmed: 12783953
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29965
pubmed: 22253838
Front Neural Circuits. 2017 Oct 18;11:77
pubmed: 29093666
Cereb Cortex. 2013 Dec;23(12):2994-3006
pubmed: 22989582
J Physiol. 1988 Feb;396:535-48
pubmed: 2457693
J Neurophysiol. 1993 May;69(5):1409-21
pubmed: 8389823
J Comp Neurol. 1996 Jun 03;369(3):345-60
pubmed: 8743417
J Comp Neurol. 1984 Jul 20;227(1):136-57
pubmed: 6088594
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun 1;113(10):3474-89
pubmed: 25810482
J Comp Neurol. 1994 Oct 8;348(2):261-76
pubmed: 7814691
Arch Ital Biol. 1987 Dec;126(1):41-67
pubmed: 3449006
Nature. 2003 Oct 30;425(6961):917-25
pubmed: 14586460
J Comp Neurol. 1990 May 1;295(1):136-54
pubmed: 2341631
J Neurosci. 2018 Aug 15;38(33):7204-7220
pubmed: 29976625
Neuroscience. 1984 Nov;13(3):827-54
pubmed: 6527780
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Aug;108(4):1186-98
pubmed: 22572947
Nat Neurosci. 2012 Mar 25;15(5):793-802
pubmed: 22446880
J Neurophysiol. 1993 May;69(5):1384-97
pubmed: 8389821
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 26;8(8):e73308
pubmed: 23991186
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jun;97(6):3961-75
pubmed: 17428908
Front Neural Circuits. 2014 Jun 10;8:63
pubmed: 24959121
Neuroscience. 1979;4(12):1909-23
pubmed: 530438