Development of the project-level Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI).

Agency Agricultural development Gender equality Multidimensional measurement Women’s empowerment

Journal

World development
ISSN: 0305-750X
Titre abrégé: World Dev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9878856

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Historique:
entrez: 5 10 2019
pubmed: 5 10 2019
medline: 5 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

With growing commitment to women's empowerment by agricultural development agencies, sound methods and indicators to measure women's empowerment are needed to learn which types of projects or project-implementation strategies do and do not work to empower women. The Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI), which has been widely used, requires adaptation to meet the need for monitoring projects and assessing their impacts. In this paper, the authors describe the adaptation and validation of a project-level WEAI (or pro-WEAI) that agricultural development projects can use to identify key areas of women's (and men's) disempowerment, design appropriate strategies to address identified deficiencies, and monitor project outcomes related to women's empowerment. The 12 pro-WEAI indicators are mapped to three domains: intrinsic agency (power within), instrumental agency (power to), and collective agency (power with). A gender parity index compares the empowerment scores of men and women in the same household. The authors describe the development of pro-WEAI, including: (1) pro-WEAI's distinctiveness from other versions of the WEAI; (2) the process of piloting pro-WEAI in 13 agricultural development projects during the Gender, Agriculture, and Assets Project, phase 2 (GAAP2); (3) analysis of quantitative data from the GAAP2 projects, including intrahousehold patterns of empowerment/disempowerment; and (4) a summary of the findings from the qualitative work exploring concepts of women's empowerment in the project sites. The paper concludes with a discussion of lessons learned from pro-WEAI and possibilities for further development of empowerment metrics.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31582871
doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.018
pii: S0305-750X(19)30170-6
pmc: PMC6694750
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

675-692

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Références

Demography. 2014 Aug;51(4):1551-72
pubmed: 24846070
World Dev. 2019 Dec;124:104639
pubmed: 31798204
East Mediterr Health J. 2016 Mar 15;21(12):891-6
pubmed: 26996362
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Dec;18(17):3134-45
pubmed: 25797070
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867
Soc Indic Res. 2016 Sep;128(3):1171-1192
pubmed: 27597801
Dev Pract. 1995 May;5(2):101-7
pubmed: 12346153
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Sep 1;20(1):503
pubmed: 32873247
Trials. 2017 Sep 6;18(1):412
pubmed: 28874177
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jul;233:93-102
pubmed: 31195195

Auteurs

Hazel Malapit (H)

International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

Agnes Quisumbing (A)

International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

Ruth Meinzen-Dick (R)

International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

Greg Seymour (G)

International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

Elena M Martinez (EM)

International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

Jessica Heckert (J)

International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

Deborah Rubin (D)

Cultural Practice, LLC, USA.

Ana Vaz (A)

Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, United Kingdom.

Kathryn M Yount (KM)

Emory University, USA.

Classifications MeSH