Risk of CIN2 or more severe lesions after negative HPV-mRNA E6/E7 overexpression assay and after negative HPV-DNA test: Concurrent cohorts with a 5-year follow-up.


Journal

International journal of cancer
ISSN: 1097-0215
Titre abrégé: Int J Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0042124

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 06 2020
Historique:
received: 30 07 2019
revised: 28 08 2019
accepted: 05 09 2019
pubmed: 5 10 2019
medline: 8 1 2021
entrez: 5 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Aim of this study was to compare the 5-year risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+)/CIN3+ and the performance parameters at 3-year rescreening of a negative E6/E7 mRNA-human papillomavirus (HPV) test with those of a HPV-DNA-negative test. We studied a cohort of HPV-negative women tested with the Aptima HPV-mRNA Assay ("HPV-mRNA cohort") versus a cohort of HPV negatives tested with the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) DNA test living in neighboring areas. Both cohorts were rescreened after 3 years by a HPV-DNA test (HC2 or Cobas 4800 HPV test). HPV test positivity, referral to colposcopy and detection of CIN2+ at 3-year rescreening were computed. The Veneto Cancer Registry was checked to search for invasive cancers and CIN3 diagnosed up to 5 years from the negative baseline test. Some 22,338 HPV-mRNA and 68,695 HPV-DNA-negative women were invited to 3-year rescreening, and, respectively, 16,641 (74.5%) and 54,630 (79.6%) complied with the invitation. The proportion of HPV-positive tests, referral to colposcopy and detection of CIN2+ in the HPV-mRNA and HPV-DNA cohorts were, respectively. 4.0 and 3.9% (ratio 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.17), 2.6 and 2.5% (ratio 1.06, 95% CI 0.95-1.18) and 1.4 and 1.7‰ (ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.54-1.33). The relative 5-year cumulative risk of cancer and of CIN2+ in the HPV-mRNA and HPV-DNA cohorts were 4.5 and 8.7/100,000 (ratio 0.51; 95%CI 0.01-4.22) and 1.1 and 1.5/1,000 (ratio 0.74; 95%CI 0.45-1.16), respectively. A negative HPV-mRNA test confers a risk of invasive cervical carcinoma and of CIN2+ at 5 years comparable to that of a negative HPV-DNA test.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31583683
doi: 10.1002/ijc.32695
doi:

Substances chimiques

DNA, Viral 0
Papillomavirus E7 Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3114-3123

Informations de copyright

© 2019 UICC.

Références

World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for screening and treatment of precancerous lesions for cervical cancer prevention. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2013. Update June 2019. Available at. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/cancers/screening_and_treatment_of_precancerous_lesions/en/.
von Karsa L, Arbyn MH, Dillner J, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening. Summary of the supplements on HPV screening and vaccination. Papillomavirus Res 2015;1:22-31.
Smith RA, Brooks D, Cokkinides V, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2013: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines, current issues in cancer screening, and new guidance on cervical cancer screening and lung cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 2013;63:88-105.
US Preventive Services Task Force, Curry SJ, Krist AH, et al. Screening for cervical cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA 2018;320:674-86.
Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfström KM, et al. International HPV screening working group. Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2014;383:524-32.
Arbyn M, Ronco G, Anttila A, et al. Evidence regarding HPV testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer. Vaccine 2012;30(Suppl. 5):F88-99.
Cuzick J, Cadman L, Mesher D, et al. Comparing the performance of six human papillomavirus tests in a screening population. Br J Cancer 2013;108:908-13.
Nieves L, Enerson CL, Belinson S, et al. Primary cervical cancer screening and triage using an mRNA human papillomavirus assay and visual inspection. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2013;23:513-8.
Monsonego J, Hudgens MG, Zerat L, et al. Evaluation of oncogenic human papillomavirus RNA and DNA tests with liquid-based cytology in primary cervical cancer screening: the FASE study. Int J Cancer 2011;129:691-701.
Monsonego J, Hudgens MG, Zerat L, et al. Risk assessment and clinical impact of liquid-based cytology, oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA and mRNA testing in primary cervical cancer screening (the FASE study). Gynecol Oncol 2012;125:175-80.
Heideman DA, Hesselink AT, van Kemenade FJ, et al. The Aptima HPV assay fulfills the cross-sectional clinical and reproducibility criteria of international guidelines for human papillomavirus test requirements for cervical screening. J Clin Microbiol 2013;51:3653-7.
Iftner T, Becker S, Neis KJ, et al. Head-to-head comparison of the RNA-based Aptima human papillomavirus (HPV) assay and the DNA-based hybrid capture 2 HPV test in a routine screening population of women aged 30 to 60 years in Germany. J Clin Microbiol 2015;53:2509-16.
Giorgi Rossi P, Bisanzi S, Allia E, et al. Determinants of viral oncogene E6-E7 mRNA overexpression in a population-based large sample of women infected by high-risk human papillomavirus types. J Clin Microbiol 2017;55:1056-65.
Forslund O, Miriam Elfström K, Lamin H, et al. HPV-mRNA and HPV-DNA detection in samples taken up to seven years before severe dysplasia of cervix uteri. Int J Cancer 2019;144:1073-81.
Reid JL, Wright TC Jr, Stoler MH, et al. Human papillomavirus oncogenic mRNA testing for cervical cancer screening: baseline and longitudinal results from the CLEAR study. Am J Clin Pathol 2015;144:473-83.
Cook DA, Smith LW, Law JH, et al. Comparative performance of human papillomavirus messenger RNA versus DNA screening tests at baseline and 48 months in the HPV FOCAL trial. J Clin Virol 2018;108:32-7.
Iftner T, Neis KJ, Castanon A, et al. Longitudinal clinical performance of the RNA-based Aptima human papillomavirus (AHPV) assay in comparison to the DNA-based hybrid capture 2 HPV test in two consecutive screening rounds with a 6-year interval in Germany. J Clin Microbiol 2019; 57. pii: e01177-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01177-18.
Maggino T, Sciarrone R, Murer B, et al. Screening women for cervical cancer carcinoma with a HPV mRNA test: first results from the Venice pilot program. Br J Cancer 2016;115:525-32.
Arbyn M, Anttila A, Jordan J, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening. Second edition-summary document. Ann Oncol 2010;21:448-58.
Ministero della Salute. Piano Nazionale della Prevenzione 2014-2018. Update June 2019. Available at www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_2285_allegato.pdf
Gruppo Italiano Screening Citologico (GISCi). Raccomandazioni sul test HR-HPV come test di screening primario e rivisitazione del ruolo del Pap test. Belluno: Evidenzia, 2010. Update August 2015. Available at. www.gisci.it/documenti/documenti_gisci/documento_hpv.pdf.
Ronco G, Biggeri A, Confortini M, et al. Health technology assessment report: HPV DNA based primary screening for cervical cancer precursors. Epidemiol Prev 2012;36(Suppl. 1):e1-e72.
Zorzi M, Del Mistro A, Farruggio A, et al. Use of a high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test as the primary test in a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study. BJOG 2013;120:1260-8.
Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. Forum group members; Bethesda 2001 workshop. The 2001 Bethesda system: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 2002;287:2114-99.
Ronco G, Zappa M, Franceschi S, et al. Impact of variations in triage cytology interpretation on human papillomavirus-based cervical screening and implications for screening algorithms. Eur J Cancer 2016;68:148-55.
Dalla Palma P, Giorgi Rossi P, Collina G, et al. The reproducibility of CIN diagnoses among different pathologists: data from histology reviews from a multicenter randomized study. Am J Clin Pathol 2009;132:125-32.
Zorzi M, Fedato C, Cogo C, et al. I programmi di screening oncologici del Veneto. Padova, Italy: CLEUP 2015. Rapporto 2012-2013. Update June 2019. Available at file:///C:/Users/MANUEL~1/AppData/Local/Temp/Rapporto_Veneto_Screening_2012-2013-1.pdf.

Auteurs

Manuel Zorzi (M)

Veneto Tumour Registry, Azienda Zero, Padua, Italy.

Annarosa Del Mistro (A)

Immunology and Diagnostic Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.

Paolo Giorgi Rossi (P)

Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale, IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Licia Laurino (L)

Pathology Unit, Dell'Angelo General Hospital, Venice, Italy.

Jessica Battagello (J)

Veneto Tumour Registry, Azienda Zero, Padua, Italy.

Melania Lorio (M)

Department of Prevention, Local Health Authority 3 Serenissima, Venice, Italy.

Marika Soldà (M)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dell'Angelo General Hospital, Venice, Italy.

Eva Martinotti Gabellotti (E)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dell'Angelo General Hospital, Venice, Italy.

Michela Maran (M)

Pathology Unit, Dell'Angelo General Hospital, Venice, Italy.

Antonella Dal Cin (A)

Veneto Tumour Registry, Azienda Zero, Padua, Italy.

Annarita Fiore (A)

Veneto Tumour Registry, Azienda Zero, Padua, Italy.

Massimo Rugge (M)

Veneto Tumour Registry, Azienda Zero, Padua, Italy.
Deparment of Diagnostic Medical Sciences and Special Therapies, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.

Tiziano Maggino (T)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dell'Angelo General Hospital, Venice, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH