Evaluation of ethanedinitrile (EDN) as a preplant soil fumigant in Florida strawberry production.
charcoal rot
ethanedinitrile
methyl bromide
purple nutsedge
soil-borne pathogens
Journal
Pest management science
ISSN: 1526-4998
Titre abrégé: Pest Manag Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100898744
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
09
07
2019
revised:
23
09
2019
accepted:
27
09
2019
pubmed:
5
10
2019
medline:
18
4
2020
entrez:
5
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ethanedinitrile (EDN) has shown promising efficacy against weeds, plant-parasitic nematodes and soil-borne pathogens. Field experiments were conducted for three strawberry (Fragaria× ananassa D.) seasons in Balm and Dover, FL, USA to evaluate the control efficacy of EDN applied through drip tape on various weed species and the fungus Macrophomina phaseolina, the causal agent of charcoal rot of strawberry. Results revealed that 224, 336, 448 or 560 kg ha EDN has potential to be an efficacious tool for soil disinfestation and weed control in plasticulture strawberry production. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Ethanedinitrile (EDN) has shown promising efficacy against weeds, plant-parasitic nematodes and soil-borne pathogens. Field experiments were conducted for three strawberry (Fragaria× ananassa D.) seasons in Balm and Dover, FL, USA to evaluate the control efficacy of EDN applied through drip tape on various weed species and the fungus Macrophomina phaseolina, the causal agent of charcoal rot of strawberry.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Results revealed that 224, 336, 448 or 560 kg ha
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
EDN has potential to be an efficacious tool for soil disinfestation and weed control in plasticulture strawberry production. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
Substances chimiques
Nitriles
0
Pesticides
0
Soil
0
cyanogen
534Q0F66RK
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1134-1141Informations de copyright
© 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
Références
Webster T, Weed survey - southern states: vegetable, fruit, and nut crops subsection. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 63:246-253 (2010).
Patterson DT, Suppression of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) with polyethylene film mulch. Weed Technol 12:275-280 (1998).
Webster TM, Patch expansion of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) with and without polyethylene mulch. Weed Sci 53:839-845 (2005).
Boyd NS, Vallad G, Wu F, Noling J and Guan Z, Placement of metam potassium in combination with dimethyl disulfide, chloropicrin, and 1,3-dichloropropene for Cyperus rotundus L. and broadleaf weed control in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Crop Prot 100:45-50 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.05.021.
Samtani JB, Weber JB and Fennimore SA, Tolerance of strawberry cultivars to oxyfluorfen and flumioxazin herbicides. HortScience 47:848-851 (2012). https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.47.7.848.
Yu J and Boyd NS, Weed control with and strawberry tolerance to herbicides applied through drip irrigation. Weed Technol 31:870-876 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.63.
Boyd NS and Reed T, Strawberry tolerance to bed-top and drip-applied preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 30:492-498 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-15-00149.1.
Daugovish O, Fennimore SA and Mochizuki MJ, Integration of oxyfluorfen into strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) weed management programs. Weed Technol 22:685-690 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-08-077.1.
Gilreath JP and Santos BM, Purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) control with fumigant and pebulate combinations in tomato. Weed Technol 19:575-579 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-04-088R2.1.
Adcock CW, Foshee IIIWG, Wehtje GR and Gilliam CH, Herbicide combinations in tomato to prevent nutsedge (Cyperus esulentus) punctures in plastic mulch for multi-cropping systems. Weed Technol 22:136-141 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-07-060.1.
Eure PM and Culpepper AS, Bell pepper and weed response to dimethyl disulfide plus chloropicrin and herbicide systems. Weed Technol 31:1-7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.74.
Hanson B and Shrestha A, Weed control with methyl bromide alternatives. CAB Rev Perspect Agric Vet Sci Nutr Nat Resour 1:1-13 (2006).
Yu J, Sharpe SM and Boyd NS, Fumigants alone or in combination with herbicide for weed management in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum). Crop Prot 118:31-35 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2018.12.010.
Zasada IA, Halbrendt JM, Kokalis-Burelle N, LaMondia J, McKenry MV and Noling JW, Managing nematodes without methyl bromide. Annu Rev Phytopathol 48:311-328 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114425.
Baggio JS, Chamorro M, Cordova LG, Noling JW, Vallad GE and Peres NA, Effect of formulations of allyl isothiocyanate on survival of Macrophomina phaseolina from strawberry. Plant Dis 102:2212-2219 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-01-18-0172-RE.
Baggio JS, Cordova LG, Noling JW, Peres NA, Chloropicrin rates for control of charcoal rot (Macrophomina phaseolina) in Florida strawberries. Proceedings of the Methyl Bromide Alternative Outreach Conference, Orlando, FL (2018).
Yu J, Land CJ, Vallad GE and Boyd NS, Tomato tolerance and pest control following fumigation with different ratios of dimethyl disulfide and chloropicrin. Pest Manag Sci 75:1416-1424 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5262.
Peres NA, Baggio JS and Mertely JC, Charcoal rot of strawberries caused by Macrophomina phaseolina. PP242. UF/ IFAS Extension (2018). Available: https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/PP/PP16100.pdf [6 June 2019].
Mertely J, Seijo T and Peres N, First report of Macrophomina phaseolina causing a crown rot of strawberry in Florida. Plant Dis 89:434-434 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-89-0434A.
Baggio JS, Cordova LG and Peres NA, Sources of inoculum and survival of Macrophomina phaseolina in Florida strawberry fields. Plant Dis 103:2417-2424 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-19-0510-RE.
Avilés M, Castillo S, Bascon J, Zea-Bonilla T, Martín-Sánchez P and Pérez-Jiménez R, First report of Macrophomina phaseolina causing crown and root rot of strawberry in Spain. Plant Pathol 57:382 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-11-0193.
Dhingra O and Sinclair J, Survival of Macrophomina phaseolina sclerotia in soil: effects of soil moisture, carbon:nitrogen ratios, carbon sources, and nitrogen concentrations. Phytopathology 65:236-240 (1975).
Zveibil A, Mor N, Gnayem N and Freeman S, Survival, host-pathogen interaction, and management of Macrophomina phaseolina on strawberry in Israel. Plant Dis 96:265-272 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-11-0299.
Chamorro M, Seijo T, Noling J, De los Santos B and Peres N, Efficacy of fumigant treatments and inoculum placement on control of Macrophomina phaseolina in strawberry beds. Crop Prot 90:163-169 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.08.020.
Porter I, Mattner S, Mann R and Gounder R, Strawberry nurseries: summaries of alternatives and trials in different geographic regions. Acta Hortic 708:187-192 (2004). https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.708.30.
Hooper JL, Desmarchelier JM, Ren Y and Allen SE, Toxicity of cyanogen to insects of stored grain. Pest Manag Sci 59:353-357 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.648.
O'Brien IG, Desmarchelier FJM, Yonglin R, Cyanogen fumigants and methods of fumigation using cyanogen. US Patent 6,001,383, 1999 (1999). https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO1996001051
Mattner S, Gounder R, Mann R, Porter I, Matthiessen J, Ren Y et al., Ethanedinitrile (C2N2)-a novel soil fumigant for strawberry production. Acta Hortic 708:197-204 (2004). https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.708.32.
García-Méndez E, García-Sinovas D, Andrade M, Cal AD, Melgarejo P, Salto T et al., Alternatives to methyl bromide for strawberry nursery production in Spain. Acta Hortic 842:965-968 (2009). https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.842.214.
Rosskopf EN, Kokalis-Burelle N, Peterson GL and Waterford C, Preliminary investigation of ethanedinitrile for control of weeds and nematodes important to Florida production systems. Proceedings of Methyl Bromide Alternative Outreach Conference, San Diego, CA (2007).
Stevens MC, Freeman JH and Boyd NS, Impact of ethanedinitrile rates and application method on nutsedge species and tomato root galling. Crop Prot 116:1-6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2018.10.001.
Matheson Tri-Gas, Material safety data sheet-cyanogen. Matheson Tri-Gas, I, Basking Ridge, NJ (2008).
Ren Y, Sarwar M and Wright E, Development of cyanogen for soil fumigation. Annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions, Orlando, FL. (2002). Available: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.656.329&rep=rep1&type=pdf [28 June 2019].
Waterfordspiops C, Renspiops Y, Mattnerspiops S and Sarwarspiops M, Ethanedinitrile (C2N2)-a novel soil fumigant for insect, nematode, pathogen and weed control. Proceedings of the Methyl BromideAlternatives Outreach Conference, Orlando, FL (2004).
Samtani JB, Derr J, Conway MA and Flanagan RD, Evaluating soil solarization for weed control and strawberry (Fragaria xananassa) yield in annual plasticulture production. Weed Technol 31:455-463 (2017).
Desaeger JA, Seebold KW and Csinos AS, Effect of application timing and methodon efficacy and phytotoxicity of 1,3-D, chloropicrin and metam-sodium combinationsin squash plasticulture. Pest Manag Sci 64:230-238 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1503.
Ruzo LO, Physical, chemical and environmental properties of selected chemical alternatives for the pre-plant use of methyl bromide as soil fumigant. Pest Manag Sci 62:99-113 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1135.
Stevens M and Freeman J, Soil persistence of dimethyl disulfide combined with chloropicrin after repeated applications. Crop Prot 98:143-148 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.03.027.
Gamliel A and Triky-Dotan S, Accelerated degradation of soil fumigants: occurrence and agricultural consequences, in Recent Developments in Management of Plant Diseases. Plant Pathology in the 21st Century (Contributions to the 9th International Congress), ed. by Gisi U, Chet I and Gullino M. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 311-328 (2010).
Haar MJ, Fennimore SA, Ajwa HA and Winterbottom C, Chloropicrin effect of weed seed viability. Crop Prot 22:109-115 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0261-2194(02)00119-9.
Hutchinson CM, McGiffen ME Jr, Sims J and Becker J, Fumigant combinations for Cyperus esculentum L. control. Pest Manag Sci 60:369-374 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.781.
Santos BM, Gilreath JP and Motis TN, Impact of chloropicrin on nutsedge emergence through polyethylene mulch. HortTechnology 16:31-32 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-005-2501-4.
López-Aranda J, Miranda L, Soria C, Pérez-Jiménez R, Zea T, Talavera M et al., Chemical alternatives to methyl bromide for strawberry in the area of Huelva (Spain): 2002-2007 results. Acta Hortic 842:957-960 (2008). https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.842.212.
Ajwa H, Thalavaisundaram S and Stanghellini M, Dose response of weed seeds, nematodes, and pathogens to twelve rates of EDN. 3.1-3.2. Proceedings Methyl Bromide Alternative Outreach (MBAO): Fumigation and Alternatives for Production, Storage and Trade Conference, Orlando, FL (2018).
Mattnerspiops S, Gregoriospiops R, Renspiops Y, Hylandspiops T, Gounderspiops R, Sarwarspiops M et al., Application techniques influence the efficacy of ethanedinitrile (C2N2) for soil disinfestation. Proceedings of Methyl Bromide Alternative Outreach Conference, San Diego, CA (2003).
Boyd N, Peres N, Baggio J, Desaeger J and Noling J, Evaluation of EDN fumigas for use in strawberry. FSREF Research Reports 2017-18 (2018). Available: https://member.floridastrawberry.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/FSREF-2017-18-Boyd-EDN-Research-Report.pdf [4 July 2019].