Magnetic resonance imaging presentation of deep infiltrating endometriosis nodules before and after pregnancy: A case series.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
09
05
2019
accepted:
18
09
2019
entrez:
5
10
2019
pubmed:
5
10
2019
medline:
17
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To compare the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) lesions before and after pregnancy. Retrospective study. A single French university tertiary referral hospital. Twenty-one women without a prior history of surgery for endometriosis with a radiological diagnosis by MRI with two sets of examinations performed before and after pregnancy. The volumes of the lesions were compared using the same protocol before and after pregnancy based on MRI (1.5 T) examinations by a single experienced radiologist who is a referring practitioner for image-based diagnosis of endometriosis. The DIE lesion volume. Between October 2012 and December 2016, a total of 21 patients (67 lesions) were included and compared before and after pregnancy. The mean time interval between the MRI before pregnancy and delivery was 19.6 ± 8.5 months (median: 17.6, IQR 13.5-25.2 months). The mean time interval between delivery and the MRI after pregnancy was 11.0 ± 6.4 months (median: 8.3, IQR 6-15.2 months). The mean overall DIE lesion volume by MRI was significantly higher before pregnancy compared to after pregnancy (2,552 ± 3,315 mm3 vs. 1,708 ± 3,266 mm3, respectively, p < 0.01). The mean volume by MRI of the largest lesion of each patient was significantly higher before pregnancy compared to after pregnancy (4,728 ± 4,776 mm3 vs. 3165 ± 5299 mm3; p < 0.01). Our data indicate a favorable impact of pregnancy on DIE lesion volumes as measured by MRI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31584969
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223330
pii: PONE-D-19-13233
pmc: PMC6777797
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0223330Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Fertil Steril. 2017 Dec;108(6):913-930
pubmed: 29202965
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Mar;99(3):881-90
pubmed: 24423291
Endocr Rev. 2014 Dec;35(6):851-905
pubmed: 25141152
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Mar;291(3):611-21
pubmed: 25288268
Lancet. 2010 Aug 28;376(9742):730-8
pubmed: 20801404
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;46(6):737-40
pubmed: 25766661
Acta Radiol. 2010 Jun;51(5):573-80
pubmed: 20380608
Fertil Steril. 2017 Jul;108(1):28-31
pubmed: 28668152
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1989;24(3):148-54
pubmed: 2544306
Placenta. 2013 Feb;34(2):100-5
pubmed: 23232321
Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2015 Aug;36(4):385-93
pubmed: 26296488
Hum Reprod. 2013 Aug;28(8):2023
pubmed: 23861497
BJOG. 2017 Jan;124(2):306-312
pubmed: 27704657
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jan-Feb;22(1):70-103
pubmed: 26450609
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jan-Feb;22(1):104-15
pubmed: 26395640
Hum Reprod Update. 2018 May 1;24(3):290-299
pubmed: 29471493
Eur Radiol. 2006 Feb;16(2):285-98
pubmed: 16155722
Eur Radiol. 2017 Jul;27(7):2765-2775
pubmed: 27921160
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 22;5:CD001019
pubmed: 29786828
Hum Reprod. 2016 May;31(5):1014-23
pubmed: 26965434
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;46(1):109-17
pubmed: 25358293
Hum Reprod. 2009 Sep;24(9):2341-7
pubmed: 19439428
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 24;362(25):2389-98
pubmed: 20573927
Hum Reprod. 2012 Jun;27(6):1663-7
pubmed: 22447627
Fertil Steril. 2018 Aug;110(3):459-466
pubmed: 30098698
Fertil Steril. 2009 Dec;92(6):1825-33
pubmed: 19019357
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;200(6):615.e1-6
pubmed: 19136085
Fertil Steril. 2009 Feb;91(2):325-30
pubmed: 18384780
Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(3):716-21
pubmed: 19061997
BJOG. 2012 Nov;119(12):1538-43
pubmed: 22900995
BJOG. 2017 Jan;124(1):88-95
pubmed: 27346286
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 22;11(12):e0168476
pubmed: 28005934
Fertil Steril. 2017 Jul;108(1):19-27
pubmed: 28602477
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;216(3):280.e1-280.e9
pubmed: 27899313
Radiographics. 2012 Oct;32(6):1675-91
pubmed: 23065164
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Feb;209:100-104
pubmed: 26482730
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Mar-Apr;15(2):202-4
pubmed: 18312991
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Jan;160(1):35-9
pubmed: 22099535
Hum Reprod. 2018 Mar 1;33(3):347-352
pubmed: 29206943
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 26;2:CD009591
pubmed: 26919512
Am J Pathol. 1927 Mar;3(2):93-110.43
pubmed: 19969738
Hum Reprod. 2006 Jul;21(7):1839-45
pubmed: 16543256
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2003;56(4):207-12
pubmed: 14614250
BJOG. 2017 Feb;124(3):444-452
pubmed: 26887349
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug;195(2):426-32
pubmed: 16890551
Radiology. 1991 Jul;180(1):73-8
pubmed: 2052726
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;204(3):193-201
pubmed: 21094932
J Ultrasound Med. 2005 Sep;24(9):1289-94
pubmed: 16123189
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Nov;191(5):1539-42
pubmed: 15547522
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Nov;97(11):4228-35
pubmed: 22969138
Hum Reprod. 2009 Oct;24(10):2504-14
pubmed: 19574277
Hum Reprod. 2015 Feb;30(2):392-405
pubmed: 25432921
Fertil Steril. 2010 Jun;94(1):78-84
pubmed: 19356751
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Nov;230:182-187
pubmed: 30308401
Endocr Relat Cancer. 1999 Jun;6(2):293-301
pubmed: 10731122
Fertil Steril. 2014 Feb;101(2):442-6
pubmed: 24360567
Abdom Imaging. 2010 Dec;35(6):726-31
pubmed: 20820774
Fertil Steril. 2017 Jan;107(1):160-166
pubmed: 27743699
Hum Reprod. 2018 Mar 1;33(3):353-356
pubmed: 29420711
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jun;22(4):497-515
pubmed: 26912000
J Am Med Assoc. 1949 Apr 9;139(15):971
pubmed: 18113902
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;44(3):354-60
pubmed: 24496773
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013 Sep;29(9):863-6
pubmed: 23844984