Questionnaire survey on women's views after a first caesarean delivery in two tertiary centres in Ireland and their preference for involvement in a future randomised trial on mode of birth.
Adult
Cesarean Section
/ psychology
Elective Surgical Procedures
/ psychology
Emergencies
Female
Health Care Surveys
Humans
Ireland
Patient Participation
Patient Preference
/ statistics & numerical data
Patient Selection
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tertiary Care Centers
Vaginal Birth after Cesarean
/ statistics & numerical data
birth preference after caesarean
caesarean section
maternal medicine
randomised trial on mode of birth
vaginal birth after caesarean
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 10 2019
03 10 2019
Historique:
entrez:
6
10
2019
pubmed:
6
10
2019
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To assess the views of women after a first caesarean section (CS) on their birth experience, preference for future mode of birth and willingness to participate in a randomised controlled trial on mode of birth in a future pregnancy. Questionnaire survey. Two tertiary maternity centres Ireland, Galway University Hospital, Galwayand the National Maternity Hospital, Dublin. Women with one previous CS. Eligible women consented to participate, and postal surveys were forwarded. Results were collected and analysed. Results were compared between women who had elective operations and women who had emergency operations. The satisfaction levels of women after a first caesarean, their preference for mode of birth in a future pregnancy and their willingness to participate in a randomised trial on mode of birth. There were 347 completed surveys of 633 women who consented to participate (54.8%), of whom 285 and 62 had emergency and elective caesarean deliveries, respectively. In general, satisfaction ratings with the delivery were greater than 90%, with similar levels of satisfaction with the care received from doctors and midwives. Women who an emergency procedure expressed lower satisfaction levels with the information about the caesarean and the debriefing received afterwards than women who had a planned operation (p<0.05). For future mode of birth, 39.5% expressed a preference for vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) in a subsequent pregnancy, and 80% said they would consider involvement in a randomised trial in a future pregnancy. Debriefing and counselling women after a CS is an important part of pregnancy care and can significantly impact on a woman's overall birth experience. A significant proportion of this cohort considered VBAC as a future birth option. These data indicate that a randomised trial on mode of birth after caesarean would be viewed positively by women in our population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31585976
pii: bmjopen-2019-031766
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031766
pmc: PMC6797389
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e031766Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 May;224:52-57
pubmed: 29547806
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Oct 12;11:72
pubmed: 21992871
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Oct;23(10):1106-13
pubmed: 20088723
Am J Perinatol. 2011 May;28(5):383-8
pubmed: 21380993
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):e110-e127
pubmed: 30681543
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Apr 11;18(1):92
pubmed: 29642858
Women Birth. 2017 Dec;30(6):481-490
pubmed: 28545775
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 10;(12):CD004224
pubmed: 24323886
PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001192
pubmed: 22427749
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Dec;44(6):521-4
pubmed: 15598289
Midwifery. 2017 Jul;50:219-227
pubmed: 28478374
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;57(2):126-32
pubmed: 22432483
Birth. 2019 Mar;46(1):51-60
pubmed: 30051510
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Feb;111(2 Pt 1):285-91
pubmed: 18238964
Matern Child Health J. 2013 Sep;17(7):1309-14
pubmed: 22991012
Clin Perinatol. 2011 Jun;38(2):297-309
pubmed: 21645797
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Sep 24;18(1):383
pubmed: 30249198
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 Sep;61(5):613-620
pubmed: 27428683
BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(2):183-92
pubmed: 24251861