Duration of Implantable Cardiac Monitoring and Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Atrial fibrillation
Meta-analysis
Monitoring
Stroke
Journal
Journal of stroke
ISSN: 2287-6391
Titre abrégé: J Stroke
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101602023
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
05
05
2019
accepted:
14
06
2019
entrez:
9
10
2019
pubmed:
9
10
2019
medline:
9
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Current guidelines do not provide firm directions on atrial fibrillation (AF) screening after ischemic stroke (IS). We sought to investigate the association of implantable cardiac monitoring (ICM) duration with the yield of AF detection in IS patients. We included studies reporting AF detection rates by ICM in IS patients with negative initial AF screening. We excluded studies reporting prolonged cardiac monitoring with devices other than ICM, not providing AF detection rates or monitoring duration, and reporting overlapping data for the same population. The random-effects model was used for all pooled estimates and meta-regression analyses. We included 28 studies (4,531 patients, mean age 65 years). In meta-regression analyses, the proportion of AF detection by ICM was independently associated with monitoring duration (coefficient=0.015; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.005 to 0.024) and mean patient age (coefficient=0.009; 95% CI, 0.003 to 0.015). No associations were detected with other patient characteristics, including IS subtype (cryptogenic vs. embolic stroke of undetermined source) or time from IS onset to CM implantation. In subgroup analyses, significant differences (P<0.001) in the AF detection rates were found for ICM duration (<6 months: 5% [95% CI, 3% to 6%]; ≥6 and ≤12 months: 21% [95% CI, 16% to 25%]; >12 and ≤24 months: 26% [95% CI, 22% to 31%]; >24 months: 34% [95% CI, 29% to 39%]). s Extended duration of ICM monitoring and increased patient age are factors that substantially increase AF detection in IS patients with initial negative AF screening.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
Current guidelines do not provide firm directions on atrial fibrillation (AF) screening after ischemic stroke (IS). We sought to investigate the association of implantable cardiac monitoring (ICM) duration with the yield of AF detection in IS patients.
METHODS
METHODS
We included studies reporting AF detection rates by ICM in IS patients with negative initial AF screening. We excluded studies reporting prolonged cardiac monitoring with devices other than ICM, not providing AF detection rates or monitoring duration, and reporting overlapping data for the same population. The random-effects model was used for all pooled estimates and meta-regression analyses.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We included 28 studies (4,531 patients, mean age 65 years). In meta-regression analyses, the proportion of AF detection by ICM was independently associated with monitoring duration (coefficient=0.015; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.005 to 0.024) and mean patient age (coefficient=0.009; 95% CI, 0.003 to 0.015). No associations were detected with other patient characteristics, including IS subtype (cryptogenic vs. embolic stroke of undetermined source) or time from IS onset to CM implantation. In subgroup analyses, significant differences (P<0.001) in the AF detection rates were found for ICM duration (<6 months: 5% [95% CI, 3% to 6%]; ≥6 and ≤12 months: 21% [95% CI, 16% to 25%]; >12 and ≤24 months: 26% [95% CI, 22% to 31%]; >24 months: 34% [95% CI, 29% to 39%]).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
s Extended duration of ICM monitoring and increased patient age are factors that substantially increase AF detection in IS patients with initial negative AF screening.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31590474
pii: jos.2019.01067
doi: 10.5853/jos.2019.01067
pmc: PMC6780018
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
302-311Références
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Jan;27(1):203-209
pubmed: 29032886
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2010 Aug;28(2):101-7
pubmed: 20454840
Eur J Neurol. 2014 Jun;21(6):884-9
pubmed: 24628954
Arch Intern Med. 1995 Mar 13;155(5):469-73
pubmed: 7864703
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;2(10):1120-1127
pubmed: 28842973
Stroke. 2013 Jul;44(7):2007-9
pubmed: 23674523
Int J Stroke. 2019 Feb;14(2):146-153
pubmed: 30196791
Thromb Haemost. 2017 Oct 5;117(10):1962-1969
pubmed: 28862284
Neurology. 2016 Sep 6;87(10):988-95
pubmed: 27488602
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Apr;14(4):377-87
pubmed: 25748102
BMJ. 2011 Jul 22;343:d4002
pubmed: 21784880
Eur J Neurol. 2018 Apr;25(4):631-636
pubmed: 29205690
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Feb;15(2):287-295
pubmed: 28919290
Eur J Neurol. 2016 Feb;23(2):375-81
pubmed: 26470854
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Oct;38(10):1236-45
pubmed: 26172621
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;40(3-4):175-81
pubmed: 26314298
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Jul 2;42(1):93-100
pubmed: 12849666
Europace. 2018 Nov 1;20(FI_3):f312-f320
pubmed: 29688326
Stroke. 2014 Jul;45(7):2160-236
pubmed: 24788967
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Apr;13(4):429-38
pubmed: 24646875
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;244:175-179
pubmed: 28624331
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 26;370(26):2478-86
pubmed: 24963567
Stroke. 2001 Dec 1;32(12):2735-40
pubmed: 11739965
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Nov 29;6(12):
pubmed: 29187386
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):e1-34
pubmed: 19631507
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Feb 18;14:25
pubmed: 24548571
Stroke. 1999 Dec;30(12):2513-6
pubmed: 10582970
Ann Intern Med. 1999 Oct 5;131(7):492-501
pubmed: 10507957
Cardiology. 2017;138(3):133-140
pubmed: 28654919
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 31;167(2):328-34
pubmed: 22809542
Front Physiol. 2015 Apr 01;6:100
pubmed: 25883570
Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):e46-e110
pubmed: 29367334
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2016 Dec;17(12):863-869
pubmed: 25379716
Int J Stroke. 2016 Apr;11(3):361-7
pubmed: 26873942
Stroke. 1991 Aug;22(8):983-8
pubmed: 1866765
Rev Neurol. 2013 Sep 16;57(6):251-7
pubmed: 24008935
Am Heart J. 2017 May;187:122-132
pubmed: 28454796
Ann Neurol. 1989 Apr;25(4):382-90
pubmed: 2712533
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Mar 15;5(3):e002944
pubmed: 27068633
Neurology. 2013 Apr 23;80(17):1546-50
pubmed: 23535493
Stroke. 2013 May;44(5):1449-52
pubmed: 23449264
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 07;378(23):2191-2201
pubmed: 29766772
Stroke. 2019 Aug;50(8):2175-2180
pubmed: 31216964