Efficacy of Dupilumab in a Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Adults With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis.


Journal

Gastroenterology
ISSN: 1528-0012
Titre abrégé: Gastroenterology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0374630

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2020
Historique:
received: 25 02 2019
revised: 19 09 2019
accepted: 24 09 2019
pubmed: 9 10 2019
medline: 15 2 2020
entrez: 9 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an allergen-mediated inflammatory disease with no approved treatment in the United States. Dupilumab, a VelocImmune-derived human monoclonal antibody against the interleukin (IL) 4 receptor, inhibits IL4 and IL13 signaling. Dupilumab is effective in the treatment of allergic, atopic, and type 2 diseases, so we assessed its efficacy and safety in patients with EoE. We performed a phase 2 study of adults with active EoE (2 episodes of dysphagia/week with peak esophageal eosinophil density of 15 or more eosinophils per high-power field), from May 12, 2015, through November 9, 2016, at 14 sites. Participants were randomly assigned to groups that received weekly subcutaneous injections of dupilumab (300 mg, n = 23) or placebo (n = 24) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 10 in Straumann Dysphagia Instrument (SDI) patient-reported outcome (PRO) score. We also assessed histologic features of EoE (peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count and EoE histologic scores), endoscopically visualized features (endoscopic reference score), esophageal distensibility, and safety. The mean SDI PRO score was 6.4 when the study began. In the dupilumab group, SDI PRO scores were reduced by a mean value of 3.0 at week 10 compared with a mean reduction of 1.3 in the placebo group (P = .0304). At week 12, dupilumab reduced the peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count by a mean 86.8 eosinophils per high-power field (reduction of 107.1%; P < .0001 vs placebo), the EoE-histologic scoring system (HSS) severity score by 68.3% (P < .0001 vs placebo), and the endoscopic reference score by 1.6 (P = .0006 vs placebo). Dupilumab increased esophageal distensibility by 18% vs placebo (P < .0001). Higher proportions of patients in the dupilumab group developed injection-site erythema (35% vs 8% in the placebo group) and nasopharyngitis (17% vs 4% in the placebo group). In a phase 2 trial of patients with active EoE, dupilumab reduced dysphagia, histologic features of disease (including eosinophilic infiltration and a marker of type 2 inflammation), and abnormal endoscopic features compared with placebo. Dupilumab increased esophageal distensibility and was generally well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02379052.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND & AIMS
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an allergen-mediated inflammatory disease with no approved treatment in the United States. Dupilumab, a VelocImmune-derived human monoclonal antibody against the interleukin (IL) 4 receptor, inhibits IL4 and IL13 signaling. Dupilumab is effective in the treatment of allergic, atopic, and type 2 diseases, so we assessed its efficacy and safety in patients with EoE.
METHODS
We performed a phase 2 study of adults with active EoE (2 episodes of dysphagia/week with peak esophageal eosinophil density of 15 or more eosinophils per high-power field), from May 12, 2015, through November 9, 2016, at 14 sites. Participants were randomly assigned to groups that received weekly subcutaneous injections of dupilumab (300 mg, n = 23) or placebo (n = 24) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 10 in Straumann Dysphagia Instrument (SDI) patient-reported outcome (PRO) score. We also assessed histologic features of EoE (peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count and EoE histologic scores), endoscopically visualized features (endoscopic reference score), esophageal distensibility, and safety.
RESULTS
The mean SDI PRO score was 6.4 when the study began. In the dupilumab group, SDI PRO scores were reduced by a mean value of 3.0 at week 10 compared with a mean reduction of 1.3 in the placebo group (P = .0304). At week 12, dupilumab reduced the peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count by a mean 86.8 eosinophils per high-power field (reduction of 107.1%; P < .0001 vs placebo), the EoE-histologic scoring system (HSS) severity score by 68.3% (P < .0001 vs placebo), and the endoscopic reference score by 1.6 (P = .0006 vs placebo). Dupilumab increased esophageal distensibility by 18% vs placebo (P < .0001). Higher proportions of patients in the dupilumab group developed injection-site erythema (35% vs 8% in the placebo group) and nasopharyngitis (17% vs 4% in the placebo group).
CONCLUSIONS
In a phase 2 trial of patients with active EoE, dupilumab reduced dysphagia, histologic features of disease (including eosinophilic infiltration and a marker of type 2 inflammation), and abnormal endoscopic features compared with placebo. Dupilumab increased esophageal distensibility and was generally well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02379052.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31593702
pii: S0016-5085(19)41415-7
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.042
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
IL4R protein, human 0
Interleukin-4 Receptor alpha Subunit 0
Placebos 0
dupilumab 420K487FSG

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02379052']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

111-122.e10

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ikuo Hirano (I)

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: i-hirano@northwestern.edu.

Evan S Dellon (ES)

Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Jennifer D Hamilton (JD)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, New York.

Margaret H Collins (MH)

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Kathryn Peterson (K)

University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Mirna Chehade (M)

Mount Sinai Center for Eosinophilic Disorders, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Alain M Schoepfer (AM)

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois et Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Ekaterina Safroneeva (E)

Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Marc E Rothenberg (ME)

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Gary W Falk (GW)

University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Yehudith Assouline-Dayan (Y)

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.

Qiong Zhao (Q)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, New York.

Zhen Chen (Z)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, New York.

Brian N Swanson (BN)

Sanofi, Bridgewater, New Jersey.

Gianluca Pirozzi (G)

Sanofi, Bridgewater, New Jersey.

Leda Mannent (L)

Sanofi, Chilly-Mazarin, France.

Neil M H Graham (NMH)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, New York.

Bolanle Akinlade (B)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, New York.

Neil Stahl (N)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, New York.

George D Yancopoulos (GD)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, New York.

Allen Radin (A)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, New York.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH