Nonlinear mixed-effects models for modeling in vitro drug response data to determine problematic cancer cell lines.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 10 2019
08 10 2019
Historique:
received:
18
04
2019
accepted:
23
09
2019
entrez:
10
10
2019
pubmed:
9
10
2019
medline:
3
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cancer cell lines (CCLs) have been widely used to study of cancer. Recent studies have called into question the reliability of data collected on CCLs. Hence, we set out to determine CCLs that tend to be overly sensitive or resistant to a majority of drugs utilizing a nonlinear mixed-effects (NLME) modeling framework. Using drug response data collected in the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) and the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC), we determined the optimal functional form for each drug. Then, a NLME model was fit to the drug response data, with the estimated random effects used to determine sensitive or resistant CCLs. Out of the roughly 500 CCLs studies from the CCLE, we found 17 cell lines to be overly sensitive or resistant to the studied drugs. In the GDSC, we found 15 out of the 990 CCLs to be excessively sensitive or resistant. These results can inform researchers in the selection of CCLs to include in drug studies. Additionally, this study illustrates the need for assessing the dose-response functional form and the use of NLME models to achieve more stable estimates of drug response parameters.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31594982
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50936-0
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-50936-0
pmc: PMC6783462
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Pharmacological
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14421Références
Nature. 2013 Dec 19;504(7480):389-93
pubmed: 24284626
Toxicol Sci. 2011 Mar;120(1):33-41
pubmed: 21177773
Nat Chem Biol. 2013 Nov;9(11):708-14
pubmed: 24013279
Pharmacogenomics. 2016 May;17(7):691-700
pubmed: 27180993
Nature. 2013 Dec 19;504(7480):381-3
pubmed: 24284624
Nat Commun. 2013;4:2126
pubmed: 23839242
Pharm Stat. 2011 Mar-Apr;10(2):128-34
pubmed: 22328315
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0146021
pubmed: 26717316
Nature. 2016 Nov 30;540(7631):E5-E6
pubmed: 27905421
Nature. 2012 Mar 28;483(7391):570-5
pubmed: 22460902
Nature. 2015 Dec 3;528(7580):84-7
pubmed: 26570998
F1000Res. 2016 Sep 16;5:2333
pubmed: 28928933
Nature. 2012 Mar 28;483(7391):603-7
pubmed: 22460905
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D805-11
pubmed: 25355519
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 15;108(46):18708-13
pubmed: 22068913
Biometrics. 1990 Sep;46(3):673-87
pubmed: 2242409
Nature. 2016 May 18;533(7603):333-7
pubmed: 27193678
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 24;364(12):1144-53
pubmed: 21428770
Cancer Res. 2019 Apr 1;79(7):1263-1273
pubmed: 30894373
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D955-61
pubmed: 23180760