Using Patient and Family Engagement Strategies to Improve Outcomes of Health Information Technology Initiatives: Scoping Review.

health information technology health services informatics medical informatics patient engagement

Journal

Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 10 2019
Historique:
received: 13 05 2019
accepted: 30 07 2019
revised: 14 07 2019
entrez: 10 10 2019
pubmed: 10 10 2019
medline: 12 6 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Many health care organizations around the world have implemented health information technologies (ITs) to enhance health service efficiency, effectiveness, and safety. Studies have demonstrated that promising outcomes of health IT initiatives can be obtained when patients and family members participate and engage in the adoption, use, and evaluation of these technologies. Despite knowing this, there is a lack of health care organizations using patient and family engagement strategies to enhance the use and adoption of health ITs, specifically. This study aimed to answer the following three research questions (RQs): (1) what current frameworks or theories have been used to guide patient and family engagement in health IT adoption, use, implementation, selection, and evaluation?, (2) what studies have been done on patient and family engagement strategies in health IT adoption, use, implementation, selection, and evaluation?, and (3) what patient and family engagement frameworks, studies, or resources identified in the literature can be applied to health IT adoption, use, implementation, selection, and evaluation? This scoping review used a five-step framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley and adapted by Levac et al. These steps include the following: (1) identifying the RQ, (2) identifying relevant studies, (3) selecting studies, (4) charting relevant data, and (5) summarizing and reporting the result. Retrieved academic and grey literature records were evaluated using a literature review software based on inclusion and exclusion criteria by two independent reviewers. If consensus was not achieved, two reviewers would resolve conflicts by discussion. Research findings and strategies were extracted from the studies and summarized in data tables. A total of 35 academic articles and 23 gray literature documents met the inclusion criteria. In total, 20 of the 35 included studies have been published since 2017. Frameworks found include the patient engagement framework developed by Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society and the patient and family engagement framework proposed by Carman et al. Effective strategies include providing patients with clear expectations and responsibilities and providing reimbursement for time and travel. The gray literature sources outlined key considerations for planning and supporting engagement initiatives such as providing patients with professional development opportunities, and embedding patients in existing governance structures. Several studies have reported their findings regarding successful strategies to engage patients and family members in health IT initiatives and the positive impact that can emerge when patients and family members are engaged in such initiatives in an effective manner. Currently, no framework has consolidated all of the key strategies and considerations that were found in this review to guide health care organizations when engaging patients and family members in a health IT-specific project or initiative. Further research to evaluate and validate the existing strategies would be of value.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Many health care organizations around the world have implemented health information technologies (ITs) to enhance health service efficiency, effectiveness, and safety. Studies have demonstrated that promising outcomes of health IT initiatives can be obtained when patients and family members participate and engage in the adoption, use, and evaluation of these technologies. Despite knowing this, there is a lack of health care organizations using patient and family engagement strategies to enhance the use and adoption of health ITs, specifically.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to answer the following three research questions (RQs): (1) what current frameworks or theories have been used to guide patient and family engagement in health IT adoption, use, implementation, selection, and evaluation?, (2) what studies have been done on patient and family engagement strategies in health IT adoption, use, implementation, selection, and evaluation?, and (3) what patient and family engagement frameworks, studies, or resources identified in the literature can be applied to health IT adoption, use, implementation, selection, and evaluation?
METHODS
This scoping review used a five-step framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley and adapted by Levac et al. These steps include the following: (1) identifying the RQ, (2) identifying relevant studies, (3) selecting studies, (4) charting relevant data, and (5) summarizing and reporting the result. Retrieved academic and grey literature records were evaluated using a literature review software based on inclusion and exclusion criteria by two independent reviewers. If consensus was not achieved, two reviewers would resolve conflicts by discussion. Research findings and strategies were extracted from the studies and summarized in data tables.
RESULTS
A total of 35 academic articles and 23 gray literature documents met the inclusion criteria. In total, 20 of the 35 included studies have been published since 2017. Frameworks found include the patient engagement framework developed by Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society and the patient and family engagement framework proposed by Carman et al. Effective strategies include providing patients with clear expectations and responsibilities and providing reimbursement for time and travel. The gray literature sources outlined key considerations for planning and supporting engagement initiatives such as providing patients with professional development opportunities, and embedding patients in existing governance structures.
CONCLUSIONS
Several studies have reported their findings regarding successful strategies to engage patients and family members in health IT initiatives and the positive impact that can emerge when patients and family members are engaged in such initiatives in an effective manner. Currently, no framework has consolidated all of the key strategies and considerations that were found in this review to guide health care organizations when engaging patients and family members in a health IT-specific project or initiative. Further research to evaluate and validate the existing strategies would be of value.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31596241
pii: v21i10e14683
doi: 10.2196/14683
pmc: PMC6806121
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e14683

Subventions

Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada

Informations de copyright

©Kevin Leung, Drew Lu-McLean, Craig Kuziemsky, Richard G Booth, Sarah Collins Rossetti, Elizabeth Borycki, Gillian Strudwick. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 08.10.2019.

Références

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):683-9
pubmed: 19567790
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 May 16;7(10):889-903
pubmed: 30316241
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;191:9-17
pubmed: 23792833
J Health Care Finance. 2013 Winter;40(2):17-41
pubmed: 24551960
Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1:S58-S63
pubmed: 30074953
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 16;18(11):e294
pubmed: 27852556
Inform Health Soc Care. 2008 Sep;33(3):158-69
pubmed: 18850399
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Dec;138(6):1512-1517
pubmed: 27744029
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Nov 1;24(11):e352-e357
pubmed: 30452203
Comput Inform Nurs. 2013 Oct;31(10):457-62
pubmed: 24135882
J Med Syst. 2018 Jul 16;42(9):158
pubmed: 30014267
JMIR Form Res. 2018 Nov 22;2(2):e22
pubmed: 30684436
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Nov 24;11:73
pubmed: 22115059
JAMIA Open. 2018 May 23;1(2):130-135
pubmed: 31984326
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2011 Nov;28:1-18
pubmed: 22164356
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 23;17(6):e148
pubmed: 26104044
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Sep 01;24(5):903-912
pubmed: 28340229
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53
pubmed: 25895742
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):223-31
pubmed: 23381514
JAMIA Open. 2018 Sep 19;2(1):35-39
pubmed: 31984343
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Nov 21;18(1):108
pubmed: 30463613
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Mar;4(2):133-45
pubmed: 25825842
Int J Med Inform. 2008 May;77(5):291-304
pubmed: 17951106
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 07;20(11):e11350
pubmed: 30404771
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 1;20(10):e269
pubmed: 30287416
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 30;19(3):e99
pubmed: 28360022
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):944-949
pubmed: 29858526
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;257:110-114
pubmed: 30741182
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Aug 24;17(1):51
pubmed: 27553007
J Med Syst. 2017 Jul;41(7):105
pubmed: 28540617
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Dec;31(12):2805-16
pubmed: 23154997
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 7;16(1):5
pubmed: 29415734
Health Expect. 2016 Aug;19(4):817-27
pubmed: 26113295
PLoS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001362
pubmed: 23349621
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69
pubmed: 20854677
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):632-8
pubmed: 26355135
Digit Health. 2018 Sep 02;4:2055207618797883
pubmed: 30186619
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Dec 1;25(12):1626-1633
pubmed: 30346543
Can Fam Physician. 2015 Dec;61(12):1076-84
pubmed: 27035020
Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1:S22-S26
pubmed: 30074947
Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1:S33-S40
pubmed: 30074949
Clin Nurse Spec. 2013 Sep-Oct;27(5):221-3
pubmed: 23942098
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Sep;105:31-37
pubmed: 28750909
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Mar 1;64(5):536-43
pubmed: 17322168
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):396-406
pubmed: 28984405
Comput Inform Nurs. 2018 Feb;36(2):90-97
pubmed: 28901967
Value Health. 2018 Apr;21(4):386-393
pubmed: 29680093
Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1:S11-S15
pubmed: 30074943

Auteurs

Kevin Leung (K)

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Drew Lu-McLean (D)

McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Craig Kuziemsky (C)

University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Richard G Booth (RG)

Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Sarah Collins Rossetti (S)

Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

Elizabeth Borycki (E)

University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.

Gillian Strudwick (G)

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH