Clip-first policy versus coil-first policy for the exclusion of middle cerebral artery aneurysms.

EVD = external ventricular drain GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale IA = intracranial aneurysm MCA = middle cerebral artery RCT = randomized controlled trial SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage WFNS = World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies clipping coiling intracranial aneurysm mRS = modified Rankin Scale middle cerebral artery subarachnoid hemorrhage vascular disorders

Journal

Journal of neurosurgery
ISSN: 1933-0693
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0253357

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Sep 2019
Historique:
received: 11 02 2019
accepted: 07 05 2019
pubmed: 10 10 2019
medline: 10 10 2019
entrez: 10 10 2019
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms are a particular subset of intracranial aneurysms that can be excluded by clipping or coiling. A comparison of the results between these two methods is often limited by a selection bias in which wide-neck and large aneurysms are frequently treated with surgery. Here, the authors report the results of two centers using opposing policies in the management of MCA aneurysms: one center used a clip-first policy while the other used a coil-first policy, which limited the selection bias and ensured a good comparison of these two treatment modalities. All patients treated for either ruptured or unruptured MCA aneurysms at one of two institutions between January 2012 and December 2015 were eligible for inclusion in this study. At one center a clip-first policy was applied, whereas the other applied a coil-first policy. The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of these patients and compared their clinical and radiological outcomes. A total of 187 aneurysms were treated during the inclusion period; 88 aneurysms were treated by coiling and 99 aneurysms by clipping. The baseline patient and radiological characteristics were similar between the two groups, but the clinical presentation of the ruptured aneurysm cohort differed slightly. In the ruptured cohort (n = 90), although patients in the coiling group had a higher rate of additional surgery, the complication rate, functional outcome, and risk of death were similar between the two treatment groups. In the unruptured cohort (n = 97), the complication rate, functional outcome, and risk of death were also similar between the two treatment groups, although the risk of discomfort related to the temporal muscle atrophy was higher in the surgical group. Overall, the rate of complete occlusion was higher in the clipping group (84.2%) than in the coiling group (31%), which led to a higher risk in the coiling group of aneurysm retreatment within the first 2 years (p = 0.04). Clipping and coiling for MCA aneurysm treatment provide the same clinical outcome for ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. However, clipping provides higher short- and long-term rates of complete exclusion, which in turn decreases the risk of aneurysm retreatment. Whether this lower occlusion rate can have a clinical impact in the long-term must be further evaluated.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31597117
doi: 10.3171/2019.5.JNS19373
pii: 2019.5.JNS19373
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-8

Auteurs

David Hassanein Berro (DH)

1CHU de Caen, Department of Neurosurgery, Caen.
2Université Caen Normandie, Medical School, Caen.
3Normandie Université, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP Cyceron, Caen.

Vincent L'Allinec (V)

4University Hospital of Angers, Department of Radiology, Angers.

Anne Pasco-Papon (A)

4University Hospital of Angers, Department of Radiology, Angers.

Evelyne Emery (E)

1CHU de Caen, Department of Neurosurgery, Caen.
2Université Caen Normandie, Medical School, Caen.
5INSERM, UMR-S U1237, Physiopathology and Imaging of Neurological Disorders (PhIND), GIP Cyceron, Caen.

Mada Berro (M)

2Université Caen Normandie, Medical School, Caen.
6CHU de Caen, Department of Neurology, Caen.

Charlotte Barbier (C)

7CHU de Caen, Department of Radiology, Caen; and.

Henri-Dominique Fournier (HD)

8University Hospital of Angers, Department of Neurosurgery, Angers, France.

Thomas Gaberel (T)

1CHU de Caen, Department of Neurosurgery, Caen.
2Université Caen Normandie, Medical School, Caen.
5INSERM, UMR-S U1237, Physiopathology and Imaging of Neurological Disorders (PhIND), GIP Cyceron, Caen.

Classifications MeSH