Youth Study Recruitment Using Paid Advertising on Instagram, Snapchat, and Facebook: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

social media surveys and questionnaires youth

Journal

JMIR public health and surveillance
ISSN: 2369-2960
Titre abrégé: JMIR Public Health Surveill
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101669345

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Oct 2019
Historique:
received: 20 03 2019
accepted: 09 08 2019
revised: 21 06 2019
entrez: 11 10 2019
pubmed: 11 10 2019
medline: 11 10 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The use of paid social media advertising for targeted study recruitment is an effective strategy in health research and evaluation, specifically to reach diverse youth participants. Although the literature adequately describes the utility of Facebook in recruitment, limited information exists for social media platforms that are more popular with youth, specifically Instagram and Snapchat. This paper outlines a paid advertising approach using Instagram, Snapchat, and Facebook to evaluate a statewide youth marijuana prevention campaign. The objective of this study was to compare recruitment metrics across Instagram, Snapchat, and Facebook for two surveys documenting youth knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to retail marijuana in Colorado post legalization. In addition, the study assessed the feasibility of using Instagram and Snapchat as effective additions to Facebook for youth study recruitment. A social media recruitment strategy was used to conduct two cross-sectional surveys of youth, aged 13 to 20 years, in Colorado. Geographically targeted ads across 3 social media platforms encouraged the completion of a Web-based self-administered survey. Ad Words and Snap Ads were used to deploy and manage advertising campaigns, including ad design, placement, and analysis. Ad costs and recruitment metrics (ie, impressions, link clicks, and conversion rates) were calculated across the three social media platforms. Over two 1-month periods, 763,613 youth were reached (ie, impressions), 6089 of them clicked survey links (ie, clicks), and 828 eligible youth completed surveys about knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to retail marijuana. Instagram converted 36.13% (803/2222) of impressions to clicks (ie, conversion rate) in the first survey and 0.87% (864/98982) in the second survey. Snapchat generated the most impressions and link clicks, but it did so with the lowest conversion rate for both surveys, with a 1.40% (1600/114,200) conversion rate in the first survey and a 0.36% (1818/504700) conversion rate in the second survey. Facebook maintained a consistent conversion rate of roughly 2% across both surveys, despite reductions in budget for the second survey. The cost-per-click ranged between US $0.25 and $0.37 across the three platforms, with Snapchat as both the most cost-effective platform in the first survey and the most expensive platform in the second survey. Recruitment and enrollment outcomes indicate the use of Instagram and Snapchat, in addition to Facebook, may be a modern, useful, and cost-effective approach to reach youth with surveys on sensitive health topics. As the use of Facebook declines among youth, the use of more popular social media platforms can augment study recruitment for health research and evaluation efforts.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The use of paid social media advertising for targeted study recruitment is an effective strategy in health research and evaluation, specifically to reach diverse youth participants. Although the literature adequately describes the utility of Facebook in recruitment, limited information exists for social media platforms that are more popular with youth, specifically Instagram and Snapchat.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This paper outlines a paid advertising approach using Instagram, Snapchat, and Facebook to evaluate a statewide youth marijuana prevention campaign. The objective of this study was to compare recruitment metrics across Instagram, Snapchat, and Facebook for two surveys documenting youth knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to retail marijuana in Colorado post legalization. In addition, the study assessed the feasibility of using Instagram and Snapchat as effective additions to Facebook for youth study recruitment.
METHODS METHODS
A social media recruitment strategy was used to conduct two cross-sectional surveys of youth, aged 13 to 20 years, in Colorado. Geographically targeted ads across 3 social media platforms encouraged the completion of a Web-based self-administered survey. Ad Words and Snap Ads were used to deploy and manage advertising campaigns, including ad design, placement, and analysis. Ad costs and recruitment metrics (ie, impressions, link clicks, and conversion rates) were calculated across the three social media platforms.
RESULTS RESULTS
Over two 1-month periods, 763,613 youth were reached (ie, impressions), 6089 of them clicked survey links (ie, clicks), and 828 eligible youth completed surveys about knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to retail marijuana. Instagram converted 36.13% (803/2222) of impressions to clicks (ie, conversion rate) in the first survey and 0.87% (864/98982) in the second survey. Snapchat generated the most impressions and link clicks, but it did so with the lowest conversion rate for both surveys, with a 1.40% (1600/114,200) conversion rate in the first survey and a 0.36% (1818/504700) conversion rate in the second survey. Facebook maintained a consistent conversion rate of roughly 2% across both surveys, despite reductions in budget for the second survey. The cost-per-click ranged between US $0.25 and $0.37 across the three platforms, with Snapchat as both the most cost-effective platform in the first survey and the most expensive platform in the second survey.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Recruitment and enrollment outcomes indicate the use of Instagram and Snapchat, in addition to Facebook, may be a modern, useful, and cost-effective approach to reach youth with surveys on sensitive health topics. As the use of Facebook declines among youth, the use of more popular social media platforms can augment study recruitment for health research and evaluation efforts.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31599739
pii: v5i4e14080
doi: 10.2196/14080
pmc: PMC6811770
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e14080

Subventions

Organisme : NIMHD NIH HHS
ID : G12 MD007603
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

©Kelsey Lynett Lynett Ford, Tashuna Albritton, Tara A Dunn, Kacy Crawford, Jessica Neuwirth, Sheana Bull. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (http://publichealth.jmir.org), 09.10.2019.

Références

J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 28;19(8):e290
pubmed: 28851679
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 08;20(11):e290
pubmed: 30409765
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 18;20(6):e197
pubmed: 29914861
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2013 Sep;45(3):256-64
pubmed: 23676115
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 29;20(11):e11050
pubmed: 30497997
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2015 Jan;76(1):127-32
pubmed: 25486401
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Oct 27;16(10):e243
pubmed: 25348050
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Jun 02;3(2):e33
pubmed: 28576758
Child Abuse Negl. 2013 Sep;37(9):716-20
pubmed: 23768931
Transl Behav Med. 2015 Sep;5(3):254-9
pubmed: 26327930
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2014 Jun;23(2):184-91
pubmed: 24615785
Am J Bioeth. 2017 Mar;17(3):3-14
pubmed: 28207365
J Adolesc Health. 2013 Jun;52(6):792-4
pubmed: 23352727
Internet Interv. 2017 Jun;8:15-26
pubmed: 28584734
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 7;18(11):e286
pubmed: 27821383
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Feb 23;14(1):e28
pubmed: 22360969
Addict Behav. 2018 Jul;82:109-113
pubmed: 29518664
Nurse Res. 2013;21(1):35-9
pubmed: 24004430
Acad Pediatr. 2014 Sep-Oct;14(5):439-447.e4
pubmed: 25169155
Internet Interv. 2016 Apr 27;4:72-81
pubmed: 30135792
J Environ Public Health. 2015;2015:476017
pubmed: 26576162
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 10;21(1):e11571
pubmed: 30632966

Auteurs

Kelsey Lynett Ford (KL)

The mHealth Impact Lab, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, United States.
Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.

Tashuna Albritton (T)

School of Medicine, The City College of New York, New York, NY, United States.

Tara A Dunn (TA)

Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment, Denver, CO, United States.

Kacy Crawford (K)

Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment, Denver, CO, United States.

Jessica Neuwirth (J)

Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment, Denver, CO, United States.

Sheana Bull (S)

The mHealth Impact Lab, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, United States.
Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.

Classifications MeSH