Reasons for nonuse of contraceptive methods by women with demand for contraception not satisfied: an assessment of low and middle-income countries using demographic and health surveys.
Contraception
Family planning
Health inequalities
Reproductive health
Socioeconomic factors
Journal
Reproductive health
ISSN: 1742-4755
Titre abrégé: Reprod Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101224380
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Oct 2019
11 Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
01
05
2019
accepted:
03
09
2019
entrez:
12
10
2019
pubmed:
12
10
2019
medline:
13
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nonuse of contraceptive methods by women in need of contraception may impact their sexual and reproductive health. The aim of this study was to describe the reasons for nonuse of contraception among women with demand for contraception not satisfied in low and middle-income countries (considering both overall countries and various subgroups of women). We used the latest Demographic and Health Survey data from 47 countries. A descriptive analysis of the reasons for nonuse of contraceptive methods was performed among sexually active women with demand for contraception not satisfied. The prevalence of each reported reason was also evaluated according to marital status, woman's age and schooling, area of residence, wealth index, and parity. Wealth-related absolute inequality for each reason was also evaluated using the Slope Index of Inequality. A pro-rich inequality pattern means that the reason is more prevalent among the richest women while a pro-poor means the reason is more common among the poorest ones. On average, 40.9% of women in need of contraception were not using any contraceptive methods to avoid pregnancy. Overall, the most prevalent reasons for nonuse of contraceptives were "health concerns" and "infrequent sex," but the prevalence of each reason varied substantially across countries. Nonuse due to "opposition from others" was higher among married than unmarried women; in turn, the prevalence of nonuse due to "lack of access" or "lack of knowledge" was about two times higher in rural areas than in urban areas. Women with less schooling more often reported nonuse due to "lack of access." Pro-rich inequality was detected for reasons "health concerns," "infrequent sex," and "method-related", while the reasons "other opposed," "fatalistic," "lack of access," and "lack of knowledge" were linked to patterns of pro-poor inequality. Family planning promotion policies must take into account the different reasons for the nonuse of contraceptive methods identified in each country as well as the contextual differences regarding women of reproductive age (such as social norms and barriers that prevent women from accessing and using contraceptives).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Nonuse of contraceptive methods by women in need of contraception may impact their sexual and reproductive health. The aim of this study was to describe the reasons for nonuse of contraception among women with demand for contraception not satisfied in low and middle-income countries (considering both overall countries and various subgroups of women).
METHODS
METHODS
We used the latest Demographic and Health Survey data from 47 countries. A descriptive analysis of the reasons for nonuse of contraceptive methods was performed among sexually active women with demand for contraception not satisfied. The prevalence of each reported reason was also evaluated according to marital status, woman's age and schooling, area of residence, wealth index, and parity. Wealth-related absolute inequality for each reason was also evaluated using the Slope Index of Inequality. A pro-rich inequality pattern means that the reason is more prevalent among the richest women while a pro-poor means the reason is more common among the poorest ones.
RESULTS
RESULTS
On average, 40.9% of women in need of contraception were not using any contraceptive methods to avoid pregnancy. Overall, the most prevalent reasons for nonuse of contraceptives were "health concerns" and "infrequent sex," but the prevalence of each reason varied substantially across countries. Nonuse due to "opposition from others" was higher among married than unmarried women; in turn, the prevalence of nonuse due to "lack of access" or "lack of knowledge" was about two times higher in rural areas than in urban areas. Women with less schooling more often reported nonuse due to "lack of access." Pro-rich inequality was detected for reasons "health concerns," "infrequent sex," and "method-related", while the reasons "other opposed," "fatalistic," "lack of access," and "lack of knowledge" were linked to patterns of pro-poor inequality.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Family planning promotion policies must take into account the different reasons for the nonuse of contraceptive methods identified in each country as well as the contextual differences regarding women of reproductive age (such as social norms and barriers that prevent women from accessing and using contraceptives).
Identifiants
pubmed: 31601246
doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0805-7
pii: 10.1186/s12978-019-0805-7
pmc: PMC6788119
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
148Subventions
Organisme : Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
ID : OPP1148933
Pays : United States
Références
Int J Womens Health. 2014 Jul 16;6:663-70
pubmed: 25075201
Fam Plann Perspect. 1991 Mar-Apr;23(2):54-61
pubmed: 2060612
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003 Mar-Apr;35(2):94-101
pubmed: 12729139
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016 Jul 29;65(4):1-66
pubmed: 27467319
Stud Fam Plann. 2016 Dec;47(4):295-308
pubmed: 27925673
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Mar;5(3):e242-e243
pubmed: 28193384
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2018 Mar 05;27(1):e000100017
pubmed: 29513856
Heart. 2006 Oct;92(10):1520-5
pubmed: 16973809
Stud Fam Plann. 2014 Jun;45(2):151-69
pubmed: 24931073
Stud Fam Plann. 2008 Mar;39(1):18-38
pubmed: 18540521
Lancet. 2013 May 18;381(9879):1756-62
pubmed: 23683642
Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Apr 1;89(4):258-66
pubmed: 21479090
Reprod Health. 2018 Mar 6;15(1):42
pubmed: 29510682
Lancet. 2013 May 11;381(9878):1642-52
pubmed: 23489750
Glob Health Action. 2015 Nov 09;8:29735
pubmed: 26562141
Glob Health Action. 2014 Feb 13;7:23611
pubmed: 24560265
Int J Womens Health. 2013 Oct 11;5:647-55
pubmed: 24143124
Stud Fam Plann. 2014 Mar;45(1):73-84
pubmed: 24615576
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2005 Jul;18(1):37-44
pubmed: 16105325
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Sep;5(9):e916-e923
pubmed: 28755895