Electrophysiological responses of relatedness to consecutive word stimuli in relation to an actively recollected target word.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 10 2019
10 10 2019
Historique:
received:
21
12
2018
accepted:
19
09
2019
entrez:
12
10
2019
pubmed:
12
10
2019
medline:
12
10
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In this paper, we investigate the robustness of electrophysiological responses of relatedness to multiple consecutive word stimuli (probes), in relation to an actively recollected target word. Such relatedness information could be used by a Brain Computer Interface to infer the active semantic concept on a user's mind, by integrating the knowledge of the relationship between the multiple probe words and the 'unknown' target. Such a BCI can take advantage of the N400: an event related potential that is sensitive to semantic content of a stimulus in relation to an established semantic context. However, it is unknown whether the N400 is suited for the multiple probing paradigm we propose, as other intervening words might distract from the established context (i.e., the target word). We perform an experiment in which we present up to ten words after an initial target word, and find no attenuation of the strength of the N400 in grand average ERPs and no decrease in classification accuracy for probes occurring later in the sequences. These results are groundwork for developing a BCI that infers the concept on a user's mind through repeated probing, however, low single trial decoding accuracy, and high subject variability may limit practical applicability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31601871
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51011-4
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-51011-4
pmc: PMC6786994
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14514Références
J Neural Eng. 2014 Jun;11(3):035003
pubmed: 24838278
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Feb;40(1):198-205
pubmed: 18411543
Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(11):1518-30
pubmed: 10906377
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Feb;72(2):184-7
pubmed: 2464490
Psychophysiology. 1991 Mar;28(2):185-200
pubmed: 1946885
Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Dec;33(12):2898-912
pubmed: 22488914
Mem Cognit. 1990 Jul;18(4):380-93
pubmed: 2381317
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Oct;116(10):2441-53
pubmed: 16002333
J Neural Eng. 2017 Oct;14(5):056007
pubmed: 28555611
Lang Cogn Process. 2014;29(5):642-661
pubmed: 24954966
Neuroinformatics. 2013 Apr;11(2):175-92
pubmed: 23250668
Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;119(11):2658-66
pubmed: 18824406
PLoS Biol. 2017 Jan 31;15(1):e1002593
pubmed: 28141803
J Neural Eng. 2012 Aug;9(4):045002
pubmed: 22831906
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:156869
pubmed: 21253357
Mem Cognit. 1990 Jul;18(4):367-79
pubmed: 2381316
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 07;9(2):e87511
pubmed: 24516552
Psychophysiology. 2012 Apr;49(4):549-65
pubmed: 22176204
Front Biosci. 2000 Sep 01;5:E82-94
pubmed: 10966871
Psychophysiology. 2015 Aug;52(8):997-1009
pubmed: 25903295
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60377
pubmed: 23565237
Ann Neurol. 2013 May;73(5):594-602
pubmed: 23443907
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 24;10(7):e0133797
pubmed: 26208328
J Cogn Neurosci. 1996 Spring;8(2):89-106
pubmed: 23971417
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Sep;79(9):1029-33
pubmed: 9749678
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:4560-3
pubmed: 22255352
Neuroimage Clin. 2014 May 09;4:788-99
pubmed: 24936429
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Aug 15;164(1):177-90
pubmed: 17517438
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:621-47
pubmed: 20809790
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988 Dec;70(6):510-23
pubmed: 2461285