Effect of surgical parameters on the biomechanical behaviour of bicondylar total knee endoprostheses - A robot-assisted test method based on a musculoskeletal model.
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
/ methods
Biomechanical Phenomena
/ physiology
Computer Simulation
Femur
/ physiopathology
Humans
Joint Instability
/ physiopathology
Knee Joint
/ physiopathology
Posterior Cruciate Ligament
/ physiopathology
Prostheses and Implants
/ trends
Range of Motion, Articular
/ physiology
Robotics
Tibia
/ physiopathology
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 10 2019
10 10 2019
Historique:
received:
27
11
2018
accepted:
11
09
2019
entrez:
12
10
2019
pubmed:
12
10
2019
medline:
28
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The complicated interplay of total knee replacement (TKR) positioning and patient-specific soft tissue conditions still causes a considerable number of unsatisfactory outcomes. Therefore, we deployed a robot-assisted test method, in which a six-axis robot moved and loaded a bicondylar cruciate-retaining (CR)-TKR in a virtual lower extremity emulated by a musculoskeletal multibody model. This enabled us to systematically analyse the impact of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), tibial slope, and tibial component rotation on TKR function while considering the physical implant components and physiological-like conditions during dynamic motions. The PCL resection yielded a decrease of femoral rollback by 4.5 mm and a reduction of tibiofemoral contact force by 50 N. A reduced tibial slope led to an increase of tibiofemoral contact force by about 170 N and a decrease of femoral rollback up to 1.7 mm. Although a higher tibial slope reduced the contact force, excessive tibial slopes should be avoided to prevent joint instability. Contrary to an external rotation of the tibial component, an internal rotation clearly increased the contact force and lateral femoral rollback. Our data contribute to improved understanding the biomechanics of TKRs and show the capabilities of the robot-assisted test method based on a musculoskeletal multibody model as a preoperative planning tool.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31601894
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50399-3
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-50399-3
pmc: PMC6787084
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14504Références
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Nov;(392):46-55
pubmed: 11716424
Acta Orthop. 2010 Aug;81(4):413-9
pubmed: 20809740
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Oct;25(10):3123-3133
pubmed: 27289460
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018 Nov;65(11):2471-2482
pubmed: 29993490
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):572-579
pubmed: 29017801
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Sep;92(9):1238-44
pubmed: 20798441
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan;31(1):103-6
pubmed: 26476469
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8 Suppl):116-9
pubmed: 23954423
Knee. 2014 Aug;21(4):806-9
pubmed: 24856090
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Aug;30(8):1439-43
pubmed: 25791671
J Biomech Eng. 1983 May;105(2):136-44
pubmed: 6865355
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Aug;86(6):925-31
pubmed: 15330038
J Biomech. 1988;21(9):705-20
pubmed: 3182875
J Knee Surg. 2016 Nov;29(8):684-689
pubmed: 26907225
Acta Orthop. 2014 Sep;85(5):480-7
pubmed: 25036719
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jun;26(6):1709-1716
pubmed: 28940016
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):407-414
pubmed: 29079167
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Nov;(416):64-7
pubmed: 14646740
Acta Orthop. 2015 Apr;86(2):195-201
pubmed: 25323799
J Biomech. 2016 Sep 6;49(13):2982-2988
pubmed: 27507625
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Sep 7;93(17):1588-96
pubmed: 21915573
J Biomech. 2000 Aug;33(8):1029-34
pubmed: 10828334
Bone Joint J. 2014 Dec;96-B(12):1644-8
pubmed: 25452367
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Nov;(356):144-53
pubmed: 9917679
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):57-63
pubmed: 19844772
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Nov;26(11):3325-3332
pubmed: 29476198
J Biomech. 2002 Apr;35(4):543-8
pubmed: 11934426
Sci Rep. 2019 May 6;9(1):6928
pubmed: 31061388
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Nov;25(11):3549-3555
pubmed: 27888317
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2869-2877
pubmed: 28434698
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jan;476(1):113-123
pubmed: 29529625
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Nov;(416):37-57
pubmed: 14646738
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Oct;(391):210-7
pubmed: 11603671
Knee. 2014 Jan;21(1):272-7
pubmed: 23140906
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Aug;90(8):1039-44
pubmed: 18669959
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0145798
pubmed: 26717236
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jun;26(6):1636-1644
pubmed: 29247357
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2009 Jul;95(1):23-30
pubmed: 19231021
J Biomech. 1980;13(8):677-85
pubmed: 7419534
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Aug;24(8):2395-401
pubmed: 25577221
HSS J. 2011 Oct;7(3):273-8
pubmed: 23024625
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Jun;21(5):525-32
pubmed: 16494980
J Orthop Res. 2017 Nov;35(11):2557-2566
pubmed: 28233341
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Mar;32(2):376-82
pubmed: 14977661
J Biomech. 2008 Dec 5;41(16):3332-9
pubmed: 19019376
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 May;26(5):1540-1548
pubmed: 28500391
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Mar;476(3):601-611
pubmed: 29443845
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Sep;(366):264-73
pubmed: 10627744
J Orthop Res. 2014 Dec;32(12):1658-66
pubmed: 25171755
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2016 May;230(5):421-8
pubmed: 26802075
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Aug;(353):194-202
pubmed: 9728174
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Sep;(426):194-8
pubmed: 15346073
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 16;96(8):624-30
pubmed: 24740658
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jun;24(4):560-9
pubmed: 18534397
Med Eng Phys. 2010 Sep;32(7):700-7
pubmed: 20451438
Acta Orthop. 2015;86(4):426-31
pubmed: 25806653
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Dec;29(12):2324-30
pubmed: 24269068
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Nov;(404):7-13
pubmed: 12439231
J Arthroplasty. 1988;3 Suppl:S51-7
pubmed: 3199140
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Feb;89(2):236-43
pubmed: 17272435
Orthopade. 2003 Jun;32(6):469-76
pubmed: 12819885
J Orthop Res. 2011 Jul;29(7):969-75
pubmed: 21567450