A systematic review of relative indications and contra-indications for prescribing panoramic radiographs in dental paediatric patients.
Caries
Children
Dental anomalies
Dental infections
Dental trauma
Developmental disorders
Orthopantomogram
Panoramic radiography
Pathological conditions
Journal
European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry
ISSN: 1996-9805
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Paediatr Dent
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101277157
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
09
08
2019
accepted:
09
09
2019
pubmed:
12
10
2019
medline:
12
8
2020
entrez:
12
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To systematically review the evidence of the diagnostic efficacy of panoramic radiographs (PRs) in the following six clinical situations: caries, acute dental infections, dental trauma, dental anomalies, Developmental disorders and pathological conditions in children. The research question posed by the EAPD was: "In which clinical situations and age groups is it indicated/contra-indicated to prescribe PRs in relation to these six clinical situations, in children". An electronic search of the following databases was conducted: MEDLINE via OVID, EMBASE via OVID, The Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and the Cochrane Health Technology Assessment (HTA), to identify relevant studies published from 1990 to 2018. The systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Study screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment of included studies was carried out independently and in duplicate using the QUADAS 2 tool. The search resulted in 3420 potentially relevant studies, and following screening 175 full texts were obtained, of which 16 were finally included in the review. Meta-analysis was not possible for any of the aforementioned clinical situations, therefore the included studies were tabulated in terms of qualitative descriptive hierarchy of evidence for diagnostic. Based on currently available evidence there is a need for high quality diagnostic accuracy efficacy studies to address important diagnostic tasks in these six clinical situations in children, as there is a lack of scientific evidence concerning PRs in children, as there would support the production of guidelines for prescribing PRs in children along with their relative indications and contra-indications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31602555
doi: 10.1007/s40368-019-00478-w
pii: 10.1007/s40368-019-00478-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
387-406Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn