Attachment Style, Sexual Orientation, and Biological Sex in their Relationships With Gender Role.

Attachment Style Biological Sex Gender Role Sexual Orientation

Journal

Sexual medicine
ISSN: 2050-1161
Titre abrégé: Sex Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101631053

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Historique:
received: 13 07 2019
revised: 20 08 2019
accepted: 01 09 2019
pubmed: 15 10 2019
medline: 15 10 2019
entrez: 15 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Masculinity and femininity constitute the gender role construct into the general concept of sexual identity. To investigate the relationships of attachment style, sexual orientation and biological sex with the gender role. A convenience sample of 344 subjects (females = 207; males = 137) was recruited. The Attachment Style Questionnaire (ASQ), the Kinsey Scale, and the Bem Sex Role Inventory assessed, respectively, attachment styles, sexual orientation, and masculinity/femininity was administered. Regression analysis revealed that the confidence scale of the ASQ (secure attachment) and relationship as secondary scale of ASQ (insecure/dismissing attachment) have a predictive role toward a higher score of masculinity (β = 0.201; P = .000 and β = 0.208; P = .000, respectively), whereas the need of approval scale of the ASQ (insecure/fearful-preoccupied attachment) shows a reverse association on it (β = -0.228; P = .001). Moreover, to be a male is predictive for masculinity (β = 0.196; P = .000). Also, femininity is predicted by the confidence (β = 0.173; P = .002) and the need of approval (β = 0.151; P = .03) scales of ASQ. Instead, the relationship as secondary scale of ASQ is negatively related to femininity (β = -0.198; P = .0001). No association between non-heterosexual orientation and gender role was found. A better knowledge of links between relational patterns and gender roles for assessment and anamnesis phases in sexual medicine. This is the first study considering sexual orientation and biological sex in the relationship between attachment styles and gender role. The main limitation is the use of self-reported psychometric tests. Our data indicate that a secure attachment is related to both masculinity and femininity. On the contrary, different and reverse aspects of insecure attachment style characterize masculinity and femininity. Masculinity is mostly linked to insecure/dismissing attachment, whereas femininity is linked to insecure/fearful-preoccupied attachment. Moreover, although being male is a further element in support of masculinity, sexual orientation is not associated with gender role. Ciocca G, Zauri S, Limoncin E, et al. Attachment Style, Sexual Orientation, and Biological Sex in their Relationships with Gender Role. Sex Med. 2019;8:76-83.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31607585
pii: S2050-1161(19)30183-7
doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2019.09.001
pmc: PMC7042169
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

76-83

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Références

J Sex Med. 2010 Oct;7(10):3245-53
pubmed: 21053405
J Sex Med. 2010 Jul;7(7):2487-98
pubmed: 20102481
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974 Apr;42(2):155-62
pubmed: 4823550
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018 Mar;89:250-255
pubmed: 29398092
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 15;11(1):e0146867
pubmed: 26771828
Sex Med Rev. 2017 Jul;5(3):349-364
pubmed: 28596070
Sex Health. 2017 Oct;14(5):404-411
pubmed: 28838353
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Aug;61(2):226-44
pubmed: 1920064
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 22;5:1512
pubmed: 25566168
J Sex Med. 2015 Sep;12(9):1953-60
pubmed: 26346525
J Psychosom Res. 2006 Nov;61(5):629-35
pubmed: 17084140
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 20;12(6):e0179336
pubmed: 28632770
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1977 Apr;45(2):196-205
pubmed: 850004
Attach Hum Dev. 2018 Apr;20(2):135-159
pubmed: 28959920
Annu Rev Sex Res. 2005;16:119-53
pubmed: 16913290
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Mar;52(3):511-24
pubmed: 3572722
J Sex Med. 2016 Nov;13(11):1629-1641
pubmed: 27693263
Int J Impot Res. 2015 May-Jun;27(3):81-5
pubmed: 25119586
Int J Psychol. 2012;47(5):335-45
pubmed: 22242783
Arch Sex Behav. 2001 Dec;30(6):603-14
pubmed: 11725458
Arch Sex Behav. 2002 Feb;31(1):83-98
pubmed: 11910795
J Sex Marital Ther. 1982;8(3):228-40
pubmed: 7143461
J Endocrinol Invest. 2017 Feb;40(2):227-233
pubmed: 27667822
J Sex Med. 2014 Oct;11(10):2500-7
pubmed: 25066178
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Aug;29(4):569-80
pubmed: 26303084

Auteurs

Giacomo Ciocca (G)

Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Selene Zauri (S)

Chair in Endocrinology and Medical Sexology (ENDOSEX), Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

Erika Limoncin (E)

Chair in Endocrinology and Medical Sexology (ENDOSEX), Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

Daniele Mollaioli (D)

Chair in Endocrinology and Medical Sexology (ENDOSEX), Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

Laura D'Antuono (L)

Independent Researcher, Brussels, Belgium.

Eleonora Carosa (E)

Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.

Filippo M Nimbi (FM)

Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Chiara Simonelli (C)

Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Giancarlo Balercia (G)

Division of Endocrinology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Umberto I Hospital, Ancona, Italy.

Yacov Reisman (Y)

Ziekenhuis Amstelland, Department of Urology, Amstelveen, The Netherlands.

Emmanuele A Jannini (EA)

Chair in Endocrinology and Medical Sexology (ENDOSEX), Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: eajannini@gmail.com.

Classifications MeSH