Flexibility in Existential Beliefs and Worldview: Testing Measurement Invariance and Factorial Structure of the Existential Quest Scale in an Italian Sample of Adults.

Existential Quest Scale existential beliefs factorial structure measurement invariance psychometric properties

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 18 05 2019
accepted: 03 09 2019
entrez: 15 10 2019
pubmed: 15 10 2019
medline: 15 10 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of the present study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Existential Quest (EQ) Scale, a nine-items instrument developed to assess openness to changing one's own convictions concerning existential issues. We developed the Italian version of the scale and examined factorial structure, internal consistency, discriminant validity, and measurement invariance across gender and age groups. A total of 291 Italian adults were recruited, and they completed a self-report questionnaire comprising measures of authoritarianism, cognitive closure, well-being, and religiousness, alongside the EQ. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the original one-factor structure was replicated in this study, except for one-item that was removed from the subsequent analyses. Both the internal consistency of the eight-item scale as assessed by Cronbach's α and discriminant validity were in line with those of the original study. However, McDonald's reliability coefficient were quite low, and further researches employing repeated measures are needed in order to comprehend the contribution of the random error and that of the item specificity in lowering McDonald's coefficient. Finally, evidence of full measurement invariance across gender and partial measurement invariance across age was obtained. Overall, these findings suggest that the Italian version of the EQ is a promising tool for assessing flexibility about existential issues.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31607983
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02134
pmc: PMC6769119
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2134

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Rizzo, Testa, Gattino and Miglietta.

Références

Psychother Psychosom. 2014;83(1):10-28
pubmed: 24281296
J Clin Psychol. 1973 Oct;29(4):387-92
pubmed: 4766706
Scand J Psychol. 2018 Dec;59(6):678-690
pubmed: 30357868
Psychol Belg. 2017 Apr 26;57(1):59-76
pubmed: 30479454
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Oct;71(7):1292-1299
pubmed: 20691529
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2015 May;19(2):97-112
pubmed: 24989047
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Dec;67(6):1049-62
pubmed: 7815301
J Gen Psychol. 1970 Apr;82(2d Half):165-77
pubmed: 4394812
Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:141-66
pubmed: 11148302
J Pers Assess. 2013;95(4):423-31
pubmed: 23406365
J Health Soc Behav. 2002 Jun;43(2):207-22
pubmed: 12096700
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2013 Nov;49(6):1210-1213
pubmed: 24187384

Auteurs

Marco Rizzo (M)

Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Silvia Testa (S)

Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Aosta Valley, Aosta, Italy.

Silvia Gattino (S)

Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Anna Miglietta (A)

Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Classifications MeSH