Demonstration of Human Fetal Bone Morphology with MR Imaging: A Preliminary Study.
bone diseases
fetal specimen
magnetic resonance imaging
prenatal diagnosis
radiation exposure
Journal
Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
ISSN: 1880-2206
Titre abrégé: Magn Reson Med Sci
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101153368
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Dec 2020
01 Dec 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
16
10
2019
medline:
17
4
2021
entrez:
16
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
CT is a useful modality for the evaluation of fetal skeletal dysplasia but radiation exposure is unavoidable. The purpose of this study is to compare the usefulness of MRI and CT for evaluating the fetal skeletal shape. This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. Fetal specimens (n = 14) were scanned on a 3T MRI scanner using our newly-developed sequence. It is based on T The diagnostic ability of MRI with respect to the 5th metacarpals, femur, fibula, and pelvis was superior to CT (all, P < 0.050); there was no significant difference in the evaluation results of observers with respect to the cervical and lumbar spine, and the 5th metatarsal (0.058 ≤ P ≤ 1.000). However, the diagnostic ability of MRI was significantly inferior to CT for the assessment of the bone shape of the thoracic spine (observers A and C: P = 0.002, observers B and D: P = 0.001). The MRI method we developed represents a potential alternative to CT imaging for the evaluation of the fetal bone structure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31611543
doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2019-0105
pmc: PMC7809137
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
310-317Références
Pediatr Radiol. 2004 Oct;34 Suppl 3:S162-4
pubmed: 15558256
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2019 Oct 15;18(4):253-259
pubmed: 30726800
Magn Reson Med. 2007 Dec;58(6):1182-95
pubmed: 17969013
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Aug;24(2):134-40
pubmed: 15287049
Isr Med Assoc J. 2015 Jan;17(1):42-6
pubmed: 25739176
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2012 Jun;16(3):202-9
pubmed: 22483550
Pediatr Radiol. 2002 May;32(5):373-5
pubmed: 11956729
Genet Med. 2009 Feb;11(2):127-33
pubmed: 19265753
Ann Genet. 2000 Jul-Dec;43(3-4):163-9
pubmed: 11164199
Pediatr Radiol. 2014 Oct;44(10):1310-7
pubmed: 24756254
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 May;200(5):989-1000
pubmed: 23617480
Ann ICRP. 2003;33(1-2):5-206
pubmed: 12963090
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Mar;27(3):553-9
pubmed: 16551992
Pediatr Radiol. 2012 Jul;42(7):842-52
pubmed: 22532233
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jan;204(1):8-14
pubmed: 25539230
Prenat Diagn. 2012 Mar;32(3):205-13
pubmed: 22430716
NMR Biomed. 2016 Apr;29(4):458-65
pubmed: 26835664
J Ultrasound Med. 2003 Mar;22(3):255-8; quiz 259-61
pubmed: 12636325
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Apr;45(4):966-987
pubmed: 27981664
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jun;208(6):1365-1372
pubmed: 28463542
Med Image Anal. 2015 Jan;19(1):75-86
pubmed: 25291148
APMIS. 1989 Aug;97(8):689-98
pubmed: 2669853
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Dec;203(6):1249-56
pubmed: 25415702
Genet Med. 2010 Jun;12(6):327-41
pubmed: 20556869
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):1903-12
pubmed: 25024024
Eur Radiol. 2014 Oct;24(10):2417-26
pubmed: 25038852
Jpn J Radiol. 2019 Jan;37(1):73-80
pubmed: 30498876
Mol Imaging Biol. 2019 Dec;21(6):1003-1019
pubmed: 30989438
Br J Radiol. 2015 Feb;88(1046):20140496
pubmed: 25496509