Advancing functional connectivity research from association to causation.


Journal

Nature neuroscience
ISSN: 1546-1726
Titre abrégé: Nat Neurosci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9809671

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2019
Historique:
received: 03 12 2018
accepted: 06 09 2019
pubmed: 16 10 2019
medline: 1 2 2020
entrez: 16 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Cognition and behavior emerge from brain network interactions, such that investigating causal interactions should be central to the study of brain function. Approaches that characterize statistical associations among neural time series-functional connectivity (FC) methods-are likely a good starting point for estimating brain network interactions. Yet only a subset of FC methods ('effective connectivity') is explicitly designed to infer causal interactions from statistical associations. Here we incorporate best practices from diverse areas of FC research to illustrate how FC methods can be refined to improve inferences about neural mechanisms, with properties of causal neural interactions as a common ontology to facilitate cumulative progress across FC approaches. We further demonstrate how the most common FC measures (correlation and coherence) reduce the set of likely causal models, facilitating causal inferences despite major limitations. Alternative FC measures are suggested to immediately start improving causal inferences beyond these common FC measures.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31611705
doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0510-4
pii: 10.1038/s41593-019-0510-4
pmc: PMC7289187
mid: NIHMS1591780
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1751-1760

Subventions

Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : P20 GM103472
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH107549
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH109520
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : F31 NS108665
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB020407
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG055556
Pays : United States

Références

Valdes-Sosa, P. A., Roebroeck, A., Daunizeau, J. & Friston, K. Effective connectivity: influence, causality and biophysical modeling. Neuroimage 58, 339–361 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.058 pubmed: 21477655 pmcid: 21477655
Ramsey, J. D. et al. Six problems for causal inference from fMRI. Neuroimage 49, 1545–1558 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.065 pubmed: 19747552 pmcid: 19747552
Mill, R. D., Ito, T. & Cole, M. W. From connectome to cognition: The search for mechanism in human functional brain networks. Neuroimage 160, 124–139 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.060 pubmed: 28131891 pmcid: 28131891
Cole, M. W., Yang, G. J., Murray, J. D., Repovš, G. & Anticevic, A. Functional connectivity change as shared signal dynamics. J. Neurosci. Methods 259, 22–39 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.11.011 pubmed: 26642966 pmcid: 26642966
Smith, S. M. The future of FMRI connectivity. Neuroimage 62, 1257–1266 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.022 pubmed: 22248579 pmcid: 22248579
Friston, K. J. Functional and effective connectivity: a review. Brain Connect. 1, 13–36 (2011).
doi: 10.1089/brain.2011.0008 pubmed: 22432952 pmcid: 22432952
Horwitz, B. The elusive concept of brain connectivity. Neuroimage 19, 466–470 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00112-5 pubmed: 12814595 pmcid: 12814595
Korzybski, A. Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics. (Institute of General Semantics, 1933).
Yeo, B. T. T. et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 1125–1165 (2011).
doi: 10.1152/jn.00338.2011 pubmed: 21653723 pmcid: 21653723
Power, J. D. et al. Functional network organization of the human brain. Neuron 72, 665–678 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.006 pubmed: 22099467 pmcid: 22099467
Power, J. D. & Petersen, S. E. Control-related systems in the human brain. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 23, 223–228 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.12.009 pubmed: 23347645 pmcid: 23347645
Smith, S. M. et al. Correspondence of the brain’s functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 13040–13045 (2009).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905267106 pubmed: 19620724 pmcid: 19620724
Power, J. D., Barnes, K. A., Snyder, A. Z., Schlaggar, B. L. & Petersen, S. E. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage 59, 2142–2154 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018 pubmed: 22019881 pmcid: 22019881
Van Dijk, K. R. A., Sabuncu, M. R. & Buckner, R. L. The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Neuroimage 59, 431–438 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.044 pubmed: 21810475 pmcid: 21810475
Satterthwaite, T. D. et al. Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth. Neuroimage 60, 623–632 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.063 pubmed: 22233733 pmcid: 22233733
Mehler, D.M.A. & Kording, K.P. The lure of causal statements: rampant mis-inference of causality in estimated connectivity. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.03363 (2018).
Pearl, J. A probabilistic calculus of actions. in Uncertainty Proceedings 1994 (eds. de Mantaras, R. L. & Poole, D.) 454–462 (Morgan Kaufmann, 1994).
Pearl, J. & Mackenzie, D. The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect. (Basic Books, 2018).
Pearl, J., Glymour, M. & Jewell, N. P. Causal Inference in Statistics: A Primer. (Wiley, 2016).
Robins, J. A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect. Math. Model. 7, 1393–1512 (1986).
doi: 10.1016/0270-0255(86)90088-6
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C. & Scheines, R. Causation, Prediction, and Search. (MIT Press, 2000).
Marinescu, I. E., Lawlor, P. N. & Kording, K. P. Quasi-experimental causality in neuroscience and behavioural research. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 891–898 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0466-5 pubmed: 30988445 pmcid: 30988445
Hume, D. An enquiry concerning human understanding (originally published 1748). in The Clarendon Edition of the Works of David Hume: An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (eds. Beauchamp, T. L., Hume, D. & Beauchamp, T. L.) 134–198 (Oxford University Press, 2000).
Pearl, J., Robins, J. M. & Greenland, S. Confounding and collapsibility in causal inference. Stat. Sci. 14, 29–46 (1999).
doi: 10.1214/ss/1009211805
Friston, K. J. Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2, 56–78 (1994).
doi: 10.1002/hbm.460020107
Friston, K. J. et al. Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. Neuroimage 6, 218–229 (1997).
doi: 10.1006/nimg.1997.0291 pubmed: 9344826 pmcid: 9344826
Roebroeck, A., Formisano, E. & Goebel, R. Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. Neuroimage 25, 230–242 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.017 pubmed: 15734358 pmcid: 15734358
Klahr, D. & Dunbar, K. Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cogn. Sci. 12, 1–48 (1988).
doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1201_1
Lee, H. S., Betts, S. & Anderson, J. R. Learning problem-solving rules as search through a hypothesis space. Cogn. Sci. 40, 1036–1079 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/cogs.12275 pubmed: 26292648 pmcid: 26292648
Smith, S. M. et al. Network modelling methods for FMRI. Neuroimage 54, 875–891 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.063 pubmed: 20817103 pmcid: 20817103
Mill, R. D., Bagic, A., Bostan, A., Schneider, W. & Cole, M. W. Empirical validation of directed functional connectivity. Neuroimage 146, 275–287 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.037 pubmed: 27856312 pmcid: 27856312
Wang, H. E. et al. A systematic framework for functional connectivity measures. Front. Neurosci. 8, 405 (2014).
pubmed: 25538556 pmcid: 25538556
Illari, P. M. & Williamson, J. What is a mechanism? Thinking about mechanisms across the sciences. Eur. J. Philos. Sci. 2, 119–135 (2012).
Hutchison, R. M. et al. Dynamic functional connectivity: promise, issues, and interpretations. Neuroimage 80, 360–378 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.079 pubmed: 23707587 pmcid: 23707587
Lurie, D. et al. On the nature of resting fMRI and time-varying functional connectivity. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xtzre (2018).
Smith, S. M. et al. A positive-negative mode of population covariation links brain connectivity, demographics and behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1565–1567 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/nn.4125 pubmed: 26414616 pmcid: 26414616
Schultz, D. H. & Cole, M. W. Higher intelligence is associated with less task-related brain network reconfiguration. J. Neurosci. 36, 8551–8561 (2016).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0358-16.2016 pubmed: 27535904 pmcid: 27535904
Cole, M. W., Yarkoni, T., Repovs, G., Anticevic, A. & Braver, T. S. Global connectivity of prefrontal cortex predicts cognitive control and intelligence. J. Neurosci. 32, 8988–8999 (2012).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0536-12.2012 pubmed: 22745498 pmcid: 22745498
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L. & Penny, W. Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage 19, 1273–1302 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00202-7 pubmed: 12948688 pmcid: 12948688
Frässle, S. et al. A generative model of whole-brain effective connectivity. Neuroimage 179, 505–529 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.058 pubmed: 29807151 pmcid: 29807151
Honey, C. J., Kötter, R., Breakspear, M. & Sporns, O. Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10240–10245 (2007).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701519104 pubmed: 17548818 pmcid: 17548818
Lohmann, G., Erfurth, K., Müller, K. & Turner, R. Critical comments on dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage 59, 2322–2329 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.025 pubmed: 22001162 pmcid: 22001162
Lewontin, R. C. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. (Columbia University Press, 1974).
Hodgkin, A. L. & Huxley, A. F. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 117, 500–544 (1952).
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764
Hines, M. L. & Carnevale, N. T. The NEURON simulation environment. Neural Comput. 9, 1179–1209 (1997).
doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.6.1179 pubmed: 9248061 pmcid: 9248061
Goodman, D. & Brette, R. Brian: a simulator for spiking neural networks in python. Front. Neuroinform. 2, 5 (2008).
doi: 10.3389/neuro.11.005.2008 pubmed: 19115011 pmcid: 19115011
Ramsey, J. D., Hanson, S. J. & Glymour, C. Multi-subject search correctly identifies causal connections and most causal directions in the DCM models of the Smith et al. simulation study. Neuroimage 58, 838–848 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.068 pubmed: 21745580 pmcid: 21745580
Hyttinen, A., Plis, S., Järvisalo, M., Eberhardt, F. & Danks, D. Causal discovery from subsampled time series data by constraint optimization. JMLR 52, 216–227 (2016).
pubmed: 28203316 pmcid: 28203316
Schubert, N. et al. 3D reconstructed cyto-, muscarinic M2 receptor, and Fiber architecture of the rat brain registered to the Waxholm Space Atlas. Front. Neuroanat. 10, 51 (2016).
doi: 10.3389/fnana.2016.00051 pubmed: 27199682 pmcid: 27199682
Eickhoff, S. B. et al. A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage 25, 1325–1335 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.034
Craddock, R. C., James, G. A., Holtzheimer, P. E. III, Hu, X. P. & Mayberg, H. S. A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering. Hum. Brain Mapp. 33, 1914–1928 (2012).
doi: 10.1002/hbm.21333 pubmed: 21769991 pmcid: 21769991
Buzsáki, G., Anastassiou, C. A. & Koch, C. The origin of extracellular fields and currents—EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 407–420 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nrn3241 pubmed: 22595786 pmcid: 22595786
Potjans, T. C. & Diesmann, M. The cell-type specific cortical microcircuit: relating structure and activity in a full-scale spiking network model. Cereb. Cortex 24, 785–806 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs358 pubmed: 23203991 pmcid: 23203991
Logothetis, N. K. The neural basis of the blood-oxygen-level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging signal. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 357, 1003–1037 (2002).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1114
Buxton, R. B., Wong, E. C. & Frank, L. R. Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: the balloon model. Magn. Reson. Med. 39, 855–864 (1998).
doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910390602 pubmed: 9621908 pmcid: 9621908
Birn, R. M., Saad, Z. S. & Bandettini, P. A. Spatial heterogeneity of the nonlinear dynamics in the FMRI BOLD response. Neuroimage 14, 817–826 (2001).
doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0873 pubmed: 11554800 pmcid: 11554800
Jellema, W. T. et al. Heterogeneity and prediction of hemodynamic responses to dobutamine in patients with septic shock. Crit. Care Med. 34, 2392–2398 (2006).
doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000233871.52553.CD pubmed: 16849997 pmcid: 16849997
Tarantini, S., Tran, C. H. T., Gordon, G. R., Ungvari, Z. & Csiszar, A. Impaired neurovascular coupling in aging and Alzheimer’s disease: Contribution of astrocyte dysfunction and endothelial impairment to cognitive decline. Exp. Gerontol. 94, 52–58 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2016.11.004 pubmed: 27845201 pmcid: 27845201
Handwerker, D. A., Ollinger, J. M. & D’Esposito, M. Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses. Neuroimage 21, 1639–1651 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.029 pubmed: 15050587 pmcid: 15050587
Di, X., Kannurpatti, S. S., Rypma, B. & Biswal, B. B. Calibrating BOLD fMRI activations with neurovascular and anatomical constraints. Cereb. Cortex 23, 255–263 (2013).
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs001 pubmed: 22345358 pmcid: 22345358
Rangaprakash, D., Wu, G.-R., Marinazzo, D., Hu, X. & Deshpande, G. Hemodynamic response function (HRF) variability confounds resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. Magn. Reson. Med. 80, 1697–1713 (2018).
doi: 10.1002/mrm.27146 pubmed: 29656446 pmcid: 29656446
Calhoun, V. D., Stevens, M. C., Pearlson, G. D. & Kiehl, K. A. fMRI analysis with the general linear model: removal of latency-induced amplitude bias by incorporation of hemodynamic derivative terms. Neuroimage 22, 252–257 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.029 pubmed: 15110015 pmcid: 15110015
Schoffelen, J.-M. & Gross, J. Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 1857–1865 (2009).
doi: 10.1002/hbm.20745 pubmed: 19235884 pmcid: 19235884
Salimi-Khorshidi, G. et al. Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers. Neuroimage 90, 449–468 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.046 pubmed: 24389422 pmcid: 24389422
Sochat, V. et al. A robust classifier to distinguish noise from fMRI independent components. PLoS One 9, e95493 (2014).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095493 pubmed: 24748378 pmcid: 24748378
Acharjee, P. P., Phlypo, R., Wu, L., Calhoun, V. D. & Adali, T. Independent vector analysis for gradient artifact removal in concurrent EEG-fMRI Data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 62, 1750–1758 (2015).
doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2403298 pubmed: 25700437 pmcid: 25700437
Du, Y. et al. Artifact removal in the context of group ICA: A comparison of single-subject and group approaches. Hum. Brain Mapp. 37, 1005–1025 (2016).
doi: 10.1002/hbm.23086 pubmed: 26859308 pmcid: 26859308
Glasser, M. F. et al. Using temporal ICA to selectively remove global noise while preserving global signal in functional MRI data. Neuroimage 181, 692–717 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.076 pubmed: 29753843 pmcid: 29753843
Buibas, M. & Silva, G. A. A framework for simulating and estimating the state and functional topology of complex dynamic geometric networks. Neural Comput. 23, 183–214 (2011).
doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00065 pubmed: 20964542 pmcid: 20964542
Fuentes, L., Aldana, J.F. & Troya, J.M. GENESIS: an object-oriented framework for simulation of neural network models. in Artificial Neural Nets and Genetic Algorithms (eds. Pearson, D. W., Steele, N. C. & Albrecht, R. F.) 321–324 (Springer Vienna, 1995).
Ritter, P., Schirner, M., McIntosh, A. R. & Jirsa, V. K. The virtual brain integrates computational modeling and multimodal neuroimaging. Brain Connect. 3, 121–145 (2013).
doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0120 pubmed: 23442172 pmcid: 23442172
Deco, G., Jirsa, V. K., Robinson, P. A., Breakspear, M. & Friston, K. The dynamic brain: from spiking neurons to neural masses and cortical fields. PLOS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000092 (2008).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000092 pubmed: 18769680 pmcid: 18769680
David, O., Cosmelli, D. & Friston, K. J. Evaluation of different measures of functional connectivity using a neural mass model. Neuroimage 21, 659–673 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.006 pubmed: 14980568 pmcid: 14980568
Gourévitch, B., Bouquin-Jeannès, R. L. & Faucon, G. Linear and nonlinear causality between signals: methods, examples and neurophysiological applications. Biol. Cybern. 95, 349–369 (2006).
doi: 10.1007/s00422-006-0098-0 pubmed: 16927098 pmcid: 16927098
Wang, Y., Katwal, S., Rogers, B., Gore, J. & Deshpande, G. Experimental validation of dynamic granger causality for inferring stimulus-evoked sub-100 ms timing differences from fMRI. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 25, 539–546 (2017).
doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2593655 pubmed: 27448367 pmcid: 27448367
Nee, D. E. & D’Esposito, M. Causal evidence for lateral prefrontal cortex dynamics supporting cognitive control. eLife 6, e28040 (2017).
doi: 10.7554/eLife.28040 pubmed: 28901287 pmcid: 28901287
Wheeler, M. E., Petersen, S. E. & Buckner, R. L. Memory’s echo: vivid remembering reactivates sensory-specific cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11125–11129 (2000).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.20.11125 pubmed: 11005879 pmcid: 11005879
David, O. et al. Identifying neural drivers with functional MRI: an electrophysiological validation. PLoS Biol. 6, 2683–2697 (2008).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060315 pubmed: 19108604 pmcid: 19108604
Smith, V. A., Yu, J., Smulders, T. V., Hartemink, A. J. & Jarvis, E. D. Computational inference of neural information flow networks. PLOS Comput. Biol. 2, e161 (2006).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020161 pubmed: 17121460 pmcid: 17121460
Ryali, S. et al. Combining optogenetic stimulation and fMRI to validate a multivariate dynamical systems model for estimating causal brain interactions. Neuroimage 132, 398–405 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.067 pubmed: 26934644 pmcid: 26934644
Lee, J. H. Informing brain connectivity with optogenetic functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 62, 2244–2249 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.116 pubmed: 22326987 pmcid: 22326987
Power, J. D., Schlaggar, B. L. & Petersen, S. E. Recent progress and outstanding issues in motion correction in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 105, 536–551 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.044 pubmed: 25462692 pmcid: 25462692
Power, J. D. et al. Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 84, 320–341 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.048
Cole, M. W. et al. Task activations produce spurious but systematic inflation of task functional connectivity estimates. Neuroimage 189, 1–18 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.054 pubmed: 30597260 pmcid: 30597260
Mumford, J. A. & Ramsey, J. D. Bayesian networks for fMRI: a primer. Neuroimage 86, 573–582 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.020 pubmed: 24140939 pmcid: 24140939
Friston, K., Moran, R. & Seth, A. K. Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 23, 172–178 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.11.010 pubmed: 23265964 pmcid: 23265964
Aertsen, A. M., Gerstein, G. L., Habib, M. K. & Palm, G. Dynamics of neuronal firing correlation: modulation of “effective connectivity”. J. Neurophysiol. 61, 900–917 (1989).
doi: 10.1152/jn.1989.61.5.900 pubmed: 2723733 pmcid: 2723733
Cole, M. W., Ito, T., Bassett, D. S. & Schultz, D. H. Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1718–1726 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/nn.4406 pubmed: 27723746 pmcid: 27723746
Barnett, L. & Seth, A. K. The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: a new approach to Granger-causal inference. J. Neurosci. Methods 223, 50–68 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.018
Bishop, C. M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. (Springer, New York, 2016).
Rebane, G. & Pearl, J. The recovery of causal poly-trees from statistical data. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Uncertainty in AI 222–228 (1987).
Schiefer, J. et al. From correlation to causation: Estimating effective connectivity from zero-lag covariances of brain signals. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1006056 (2018).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006056 pubmed: 29579045 pmcid: 29579045
Ramsey, J., Glymour, M., Sanchez-Romero, R. & Glymour, C. A million variables and more: the Fast Greedy Equivalence Search algorithm for learning high-dimensional graphical causal models, with an application to functional magnetic resonance images. Int. J. Data Sci. Anal. 3, 121–129 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s41060-016-0032-z pubmed: 28393106 pmcid: 28393106
Sanchez-Romero, R. et al. Estimating feedforward and feedback effective connections from fMRI time series: assessments of statistical methods. Netw. Neurosci. 3, 274–306 (2019).
doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00061 pubmed: 30793083 pmcid: 30793083

Auteurs

Andrew T Reid (AT)

School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Drew B Headley (DB)

Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.

Ravi D Mill (RD)

Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.

Ruben Sanchez-Romero (R)

Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.

Lucina Q Uddin (LQ)

Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Neuroscience Program, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.

Daniele Marinazzo (D)

Department of Data Analysis, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Daniel J Lurie (DJ)

Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Pedro A Valdés-Sosa (PA)

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Cuban Neuroscience Center, La Habana, Cuba.

Stephen José Hanson (SJ)

RUBIC & Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.

Bharat B Biswal (BB)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA.

Vince Calhoun (V)

Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS) [Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University], Atlanta, GA, USA.

Russell A Poldrack (RA)

Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Michael W Cole (MW)

Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA. mwcole@mwcole.net.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH