Advancing functional connectivity research from association to causation.
Journal
Nature neuroscience
ISSN: 1546-1726
Titre abrégé: Nat Neurosci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9809671
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2019
11 2019
Historique:
received:
03
12
2018
accepted:
06
09
2019
pubmed:
16
10
2019
medline:
1
2
2020
entrez:
16
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cognition and behavior emerge from brain network interactions, such that investigating causal interactions should be central to the study of brain function. Approaches that characterize statistical associations among neural time series-functional connectivity (FC) methods-are likely a good starting point for estimating brain network interactions. Yet only a subset of FC methods ('effective connectivity') is explicitly designed to infer causal interactions from statistical associations. Here we incorporate best practices from diverse areas of FC research to illustrate how FC methods can be refined to improve inferences about neural mechanisms, with properties of causal neural interactions as a common ontology to facilitate cumulative progress across FC approaches. We further demonstrate how the most common FC measures (correlation and coherence) reduce the set of likely causal models, facilitating causal inferences despite major limitations. Alternative FC measures are suggested to immediately start improving causal inferences beyond these common FC measures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31611705
doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0510-4
pii: 10.1038/s41593-019-0510-4
pmc: PMC7289187
mid: NIHMS1591780
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1751-1760Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : P20 GM103472
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH107549
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH109520
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : F31 NS108665
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB020407
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG055556
Pays : United States
Références
Valdes-Sosa, P. A., Roebroeck, A., Daunizeau, J. & Friston, K. Effective connectivity: influence, causality and biophysical modeling. Neuroimage 58, 339–361 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.058
pubmed: 21477655
pmcid: 21477655
Ramsey, J. D. et al. Six problems for causal inference from fMRI. Neuroimage 49, 1545–1558 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.065
pubmed: 19747552
pmcid: 19747552
Mill, R. D., Ito, T. & Cole, M. W. From connectome to cognition: The search for mechanism in human functional brain networks. Neuroimage 160, 124–139 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.060
pubmed: 28131891
pmcid: 28131891
Cole, M. W., Yang, G. J., Murray, J. D., Repovš, G. & Anticevic, A. Functional connectivity change as shared signal dynamics. J. Neurosci. Methods 259, 22–39 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.11.011
pubmed: 26642966
pmcid: 26642966
Smith, S. M. The future of FMRI connectivity. Neuroimage 62, 1257–1266 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.022
pubmed: 22248579
pmcid: 22248579
Friston, K. J. Functional and effective connectivity: a review. Brain Connect. 1, 13–36 (2011).
doi: 10.1089/brain.2011.0008
pubmed: 22432952
pmcid: 22432952
Horwitz, B. The elusive concept of brain connectivity. Neuroimage 19, 466–470 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00112-5
pubmed: 12814595
pmcid: 12814595
Korzybski, A. Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics. (Institute of General Semantics, 1933).
Yeo, B. T. T. et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 1125–1165 (2011).
doi: 10.1152/jn.00338.2011
pubmed: 21653723
pmcid: 21653723
Power, J. D. et al. Functional network organization of the human brain. Neuron 72, 665–678 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.006
pubmed: 22099467
pmcid: 22099467
Power, J. D. & Petersen, S. E. Control-related systems in the human brain. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 23, 223–228 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.12.009
pubmed: 23347645
pmcid: 23347645
Smith, S. M. et al. Correspondence of the brain’s functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 13040–13045 (2009).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905267106
pubmed: 19620724
pmcid: 19620724
Power, J. D., Barnes, K. A., Snyder, A. Z., Schlaggar, B. L. & Petersen, S. E. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage 59, 2142–2154 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018
pubmed: 22019881
pmcid: 22019881
Van Dijk, K. R. A., Sabuncu, M. R. & Buckner, R. L. The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Neuroimage 59, 431–438 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.044
pubmed: 21810475
pmcid: 21810475
Satterthwaite, T. D. et al. Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth. Neuroimage 60, 623–632 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.063
pubmed: 22233733
pmcid: 22233733
Mehler, D.M.A. & Kording, K.P. The lure of causal statements: rampant mis-inference of causality in estimated connectivity. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.03363 (2018).
Pearl, J. A probabilistic calculus of actions. in Uncertainty Proceedings 1994 (eds. de Mantaras, R. L. & Poole, D.) 454–462 (Morgan Kaufmann, 1994).
Pearl, J. & Mackenzie, D. The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect. (Basic Books, 2018).
Pearl, J., Glymour, M. & Jewell, N. P. Causal Inference in Statistics: A Primer. (Wiley, 2016).
Robins, J. A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect. Math. Model. 7, 1393–1512 (1986).
doi: 10.1016/0270-0255(86)90088-6
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C. & Scheines, R. Causation, Prediction, and Search. (MIT Press, 2000).
Marinescu, I. E., Lawlor, P. N. & Kording, K. P. Quasi-experimental causality in neuroscience and behavioural research. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 891–898 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0466-5
pubmed: 30988445
pmcid: 30988445
Hume, D. An enquiry concerning human understanding (originally published 1748). in The Clarendon Edition of the Works of David Hume: An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (eds. Beauchamp, T. L., Hume, D. & Beauchamp, T. L.) 134–198 (Oxford University Press, 2000).
Pearl, J., Robins, J. M. & Greenland, S. Confounding and collapsibility in causal inference. Stat. Sci. 14, 29–46 (1999).
doi: 10.1214/ss/1009211805
Friston, K. J. Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2, 56–78 (1994).
doi: 10.1002/hbm.460020107
Friston, K. J. et al. Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. Neuroimage 6, 218–229 (1997).
doi: 10.1006/nimg.1997.0291
pubmed: 9344826
pmcid: 9344826
Roebroeck, A., Formisano, E. & Goebel, R. Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. Neuroimage 25, 230–242 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.017
pubmed: 15734358
pmcid: 15734358
Klahr, D. & Dunbar, K. Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cogn. Sci. 12, 1–48 (1988).
doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1201_1
Lee, H. S., Betts, S. & Anderson, J. R. Learning problem-solving rules as search through a hypothesis space. Cogn. Sci. 40, 1036–1079 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/cogs.12275
pubmed: 26292648
pmcid: 26292648
Smith, S. M. et al. Network modelling methods for FMRI. Neuroimage 54, 875–891 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.063
pubmed: 20817103
pmcid: 20817103
Mill, R. D., Bagic, A., Bostan, A., Schneider, W. & Cole, M. W. Empirical validation of directed functional connectivity. Neuroimage 146, 275–287 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.037
pubmed: 27856312
pmcid: 27856312
Wang, H. E. et al. A systematic framework for functional connectivity measures. Front. Neurosci. 8, 405 (2014).
pubmed: 25538556
pmcid: 25538556
Illari, P. M. & Williamson, J. What is a mechanism? Thinking about mechanisms across the sciences. Eur. J. Philos. Sci. 2, 119–135 (2012).
Hutchison, R. M. et al. Dynamic functional connectivity: promise, issues, and interpretations. Neuroimage 80, 360–378 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.079
pubmed: 23707587
pmcid: 23707587
Lurie, D. et al. On the nature of resting fMRI and time-varying functional connectivity. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xtzre (2018).
Smith, S. M. et al. A positive-negative mode of population covariation links brain connectivity, demographics and behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1565–1567 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/nn.4125
pubmed: 26414616
pmcid: 26414616
Schultz, D. H. & Cole, M. W. Higher intelligence is associated with less task-related brain network reconfiguration. J. Neurosci. 36, 8551–8561 (2016).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0358-16.2016
pubmed: 27535904
pmcid: 27535904
Cole, M. W., Yarkoni, T., Repovs, G., Anticevic, A. & Braver, T. S. Global connectivity of prefrontal cortex predicts cognitive control and intelligence. J. Neurosci. 32, 8988–8999 (2012).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0536-12.2012
pubmed: 22745498
pmcid: 22745498
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L. & Penny, W. Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage 19, 1273–1302 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00202-7
pubmed: 12948688
pmcid: 12948688
Frässle, S. et al. A generative model of whole-brain effective connectivity. Neuroimage 179, 505–529 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.058
pubmed: 29807151
pmcid: 29807151
Honey, C. J., Kötter, R., Breakspear, M. & Sporns, O. Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10240–10245 (2007).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701519104
pubmed: 17548818
pmcid: 17548818
Lohmann, G., Erfurth, K., Müller, K. & Turner, R. Critical comments on dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage 59, 2322–2329 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.025
pubmed: 22001162
pmcid: 22001162
Lewontin, R. C. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. (Columbia University Press, 1974).
Hodgkin, A. L. & Huxley, A. F. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 117, 500–544 (1952).
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764
Hines, M. L. & Carnevale, N. T. The NEURON simulation environment. Neural Comput. 9, 1179–1209 (1997).
doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.6.1179
pubmed: 9248061
pmcid: 9248061
Goodman, D. & Brette, R. Brian: a simulator for spiking neural networks in python. Front. Neuroinform. 2, 5 (2008).
doi: 10.3389/neuro.11.005.2008
pubmed: 19115011
pmcid: 19115011
Ramsey, J. D., Hanson, S. J. & Glymour, C. Multi-subject search correctly identifies causal connections and most causal directions in the DCM models of the Smith et al. simulation study. Neuroimage 58, 838–848 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.068
pubmed: 21745580
pmcid: 21745580
Hyttinen, A., Plis, S., Järvisalo, M., Eberhardt, F. & Danks, D. Causal discovery from subsampled time series data by constraint optimization. JMLR 52, 216–227 (2016).
pubmed: 28203316
pmcid: 28203316
Schubert, N. et al. 3D reconstructed cyto-, muscarinic M2 receptor, and Fiber architecture of the rat brain registered to the Waxholm Space Atlas. Front. Neuroanat. 10, 51 (2016).
doi: 10.3389/fnana.2016.00051
pubmed: 27199682
pmcid: 27199682
Eickhoff, S. B. et al. A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage 25, 1325–1335 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.034
Craddock, R. C., James, G. A., Holtzheimer, P. E. III, Hu, X. P. & Mayberg, H. S. A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering. Hum. Brain Mapp. 33, 1914–1928 (2012).
doi: 10.1002/hbm.21333
pubmed: 21769991
pmcid: 21769991
Buzsáki, G., Anastassiou, C. A. & Koch, C. The origin of extracellular fields and currents—EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 407–420 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nrn3241
pubmed: 22595786
pmcid: 22595786
Potjans, T. C. & Diesmann, M. The cell-type specific cortical microcircuit: relating structure and activity in a full-scale spiking network model. Cereb. Cortex 24, 785–806 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs358
pubmed: 23203991
pmcid: 23203991
Logothetis, N. K. The neural basis of the blood-oxygen-level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging signal. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 357, 1003–1037 (2002).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1114
Buxton, R. B., Wong, E. C. & Frank, L. R. Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: the balloon model. Magn. Reson. Med. 39, 855–864 (1998).
doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910390602
pubmed: 9621908
pmcid: 9621908
Birn, R. M., Saad, Z. S. & Bandettini, P. A. Spatial heterogeneity of the nonlinear dynamics in the FMRI BOLD response. Neuroimage 14, 817–826 (2001).
doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0873
pubmed: 11554800
pmcid: 11554800
Jellema, W. T. et al. Heterogeneity and prediction of hemodynamic responses to dobutamine in patients with septic shock. Crit. Care Med. 34, 2392–2398 (2006).
doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000233871.52553.CD
pubmed: 16849997
pmcid: 16849997
Tarantini, S., Tran, C. H. T., Gordon, G. R., Ungvari, Z. & Csiszar, A. Impaired neurovascular coupling in aging and Alzheimer’s disease: Contribution of astrocyte dysfunction and endothelial impairment to cognitive decline. Exp. Gerontol. 94, 52–58 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2016.11.004
pubmed: 27845201
pmcid: 27845201
Handwerker, D. A., Ollinger, J. M. & D’Esposito, M. Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses. Neuroimage 21, 1639–1651 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.029
pubmed: 15050587
pmcid: 15050587
Di, X., Kannurpatti, S. S., Rypma, B. & Biswal, B. B. Calibrating BOLD fMRI activations with neurovascular and anatomical constraints. Cereb. Cortex 23, 255–263 (2013).
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs001
pubmed: 22345358
pmcid: 22345358
Rangaprakash, D., Wu, G.-R., Marinazzo, D., Hu, X. & Deshpande, G. Hemodynamic response function (HRF) variability confounds resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. Magn. Reson. Med. 80, 1697–1713 (2018).
doi: 10.1002/mrm.27146
pubmed: 29656446
pmcid: 29656446
Calhoun, V. D., Stevens, M. C., Pearlson, G. D. & Kiehl, K. A. fMRI analysis with the general linear model: removal of latency-induced amplitude bias by incorporation of hemodynamic derivative terms. Neuroimage 22, 252–257 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.029
pubmed: 15110015
pmcid: 15110015
Schoffelen, J.-M. & Gross, J. Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 1857–1865 (2009).
doi: 10.1002/hbm.20745
pubmed: 19235884
pmcid: 19235884
Salimi-Khorshidi, G. et al. Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers. Neuroimage 90, 449–468 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.046
pubmed: 24389422
pmcid: 24389422
Sochat, V. et al. A robust classifier to distinguish noise from fMRI independent components. PLoS One 9, e95493 (2014).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095493
pubmed: 24748378
pmcid: 24748378
Acharjee, P. P., Phlypo, R., Wu, L., Calhoun, V. D. & Adali, T. Independent vector analysis for gradient artifact removal in concurrent EEG-fMRI Data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 62, 1750–1758 (2015).
doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2403298
pubmed: 25700437
pmcid: 25700437
Du, Y. et al. Artifact removal in the context of group ICA: A comparison of single-subject and group approaches. Hum. Brain Mapp. 37, 1005–1025 (2016).
doi: 10.1002/hbm.23086
pubmed: 26859308
pmcid: 26859308
Glasser, M. F. et al. Using temporal ICA to selectively remove global noise while preserving global signal in functional MRI data. Neuroimage 181, 692–717 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.076
pubmed: 29753843
pmcid: 29753843
Buibas, M. & Silva, G. A. A framework for simulating and estimating the state and functional topology of complex dynamic geometric networks. Neural Comput. 23, 183–214 (2011).
doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00065
pubmed: 20964542
pmcid: 20964542
Fuentes, L., Aldana, J.F. & Troya, J.M. GENESIS: an object-oriented framework for simulation of neural network models. in Artificial Neural Nets and Genetic Algorithms (eds. Pearson, D. W., Steele, N. C. & Albrecht, R. F.) 321–324 (Springer Vienna, 1995).
Ritter, P., Schirner, M., McIntosh, A. R. & Jirsa, V. K. The virtual brain integrates computational modeling and multimodal neuroimaging. Brain Connect. 3, 121–145 (2013).
doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0120
pubmed: 23442172
pmcid: 23442172
Deco, G., Jirsa, V. K., Robinson, P. A., Breakspear, M. & Friston, K. The dynamic brain: from spiking neurons to neural masses and cortical fields. PLOS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000092 (2008).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000092
pubmed: 18769680
pmcid: 18769680
David, O., Cosmelli, D. & Friston, K. J. Evaluation of different measures of functional connectivity using a neural mass model. Neuroimage 21, 659–673 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.006
pubmed: 14980568
pmcid: 14980568
Gourévitch, B., Bouquin-Jeannès, R. L. & Faucon, G. Linear and nonlinear causality between signals: methods, examples and neurophysiological applications. Biol. Cybern. 95, 349–369 (2006).
doi: 10.1007/s00422-006-0098-0
pubmed: 16927098
pmcid: 16927098
Wang, Y., Katwal, S., Rogers, B., Gore, J. & Deshpande, G. Experimental validation of dynamic granger causality for inferring stimulus-evoked sub-100 ms timing differences from fMRI. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 25, 539–546 (2017).
doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2593655
pubmed: 27448367
pmcid: 27448367
Nee, D. E. & D’Esposito, M. Causal evidence for lateral prefrontal cortex dynamics supporting cognitive control. eLife 6, e28040 (2017).
doi: 10.7554/eLife.28040
pubmed: 28901287
pmcid: 28901287
Wheeler, M. E., Petersen, S. E. & Buckner, R. L. Memory’s echo: vivid remembering reactivates sensory-specific cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11125–11129 (2000).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.20.11125
pubmed: 11005879
pmcid: 11005879
David, O. et al. Identifying neural drivers with functional MRI: an electrophysiological validation. PLoS Biol. 6, 2683–2697 (2008).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060315
pubmed: 19108604
pmcid: 19108604
Smith, V. A., Yu, J., Smulders, T. V., Hartemink, A. J. & Jarvis, E. D. Computational inference of neural information flow networks. PLOS Comput. Biol. 2, e161 (2006).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020161
pubmed: 17121460
pmcid: 17121460
Ryali, S. et al. Combining optogenetic stimulation and fMRI to validate a multivariate dynamical systems model for estimating causal brain interactions. Neuroimage 132, 398–405 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.067
pubmed: 26934644
pmcid: 26934644
Lee, J. H. Informing brain connectivity with optogenetic functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 62, 2244–2249 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.116
pubmed: 22326987
pmcid: 22326987
Power, J. D., Schlaggar, B. L. & Petersen, S. E. Recent progress and outstanding issues in motion correction in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 105, 536–551 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.044
pubmed: 25462692
pmcid: 25462692
Power, J. D. et al. Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 84, 320–341 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.048
Cole, M. W. et al. Task activations produce spurious but systematic inflation of task functional connectivity estimates. Neuroimage 189, 1–18 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.054
pubmed: 30597260
pmcid: 30597260
Mumford, J. A. & Ramsey, J. D. Bayesian networks for fMRI: a primer. Neuroimage 86, 573–582 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.020
pubmed: 24140939
pmcid: 24140939
Friston, K., Moran, R. & Seth, A. K. Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 23, 172–178 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.11.010
pubmed: 23265964
pmcid: 23265964
Aertsen, A. M., Gerstein, G. L., Habib, M. K. & Palm, G. Dynamics of neuronal firing correlation: modulation of “effective connectivity”. J. Neurophysiol. 61, 900–917 (1989).
doi: 10.1152/jn.1989.61.5.900
pubmed: 2723733
pmcid: 2723733
Cole, M. W., Ito, T., Bassett, D. S. & Schultz, D. H. Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1718–1726 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/nn.4406
pubmed: 27723746
pmcid: 27723746
Barnett, L. & Seth, A. K. The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: a new approach to Granger-causal inference. J. Neurosci. Methods 223, 50–68 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.018
Bishop, C. M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. (Springer, New York, 2016).
Rebane, G. & Pearl, J. The recovery of causal poly-trees from statistical data. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Uncertainty in AI 222–228 (1987).
Schiefer, J. et al. From correlation to causation: Estimating effective connectivity from zero-lag covariances of brain signals. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1006056 (2018).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006056
pubmed: 29579045
pmcid: 29579045
Ramsey, J., Glymour, M., Sanchez-Romero, R. & Glymour, C. A million variables and more: the Fast Greedy Equivalence Search algorithm for learning high-dimensional graphical causal models, with an application to functional magnetic resonance images. Int. J. Data Sci. Anal. 3, 121–129 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s41060-016-0032-z
pubmed: 28393106
pmcid: 28393106
Sanchez-Romero, R. et al. Estimating feedforward and feedback effective connections from fMRI time series: assessments of statistical methods. Netw. Neurosci. 3, 274–306 (2019).
doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00061
pubmed: 30793083
pmcid: 30793083