Somatosensory cortex participates in the consolidation of human motor memory.
Adolescent
Adult
Evoked Potentials, Motor
/ physiology
Feedback, Sensory
/ physiology
Female
Humans
Male
Memory Consolidation
/ physiology
Memory, Long-Term
/ physiology
Motor Cortex
/ anatomy & histology
Motor Skills
/ physiology
Neuronal Plasticity
/ physiology
Retention, Psychology
/ physiology
Somatosensory Cortex
/ anatomy & histology
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Journal
PLoS biology
ISSN: 1545-7885
Titre abrégé: PLoS Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101183755
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2019
10 2019
Historique:
received:
11
06
2019
accepted:
12
09
2019
entrez:
16
10
2019
pubmed:
16
10
2019
medline:
28
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Newly learned motor skills are initially labile and then consolidated to permit retention. The circuits that enable the consolidation of motor memories remain uncertain. Most work to date has focused on primary motor cortex, and although there is ample evidence of learning-related plasticity in motor cortex, direct evidence for its involvement in memory consolidation is limited. Learning-related plasticity is also observed in somatosensory cortex, and accordingly, it may also be involved in memory consolidation. Here, by using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to block consolidation, we report the first direct evidence that plasticity in somatosensory cortex participates in the consolidation of motor memory. Participants made movements to targets while a robot applied forces to the hand to alter somatosensory feedback. Immediately following adaptation, continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (cTBS) was delivered to block retention; then, following a 24-hour delay, which would normally permit consolidation, we assessed whether there was an impairment. It was found that when mechanical loads were introduced gradually to engage implicit learning processes, suppression of somatosensory cortex following training almost entirely eliminated retention. In contrast, cTBS to motor cortex following learning had little effect on retention at all; retention following cTBS to motor cortex was not different than following sham TMS stimulation. We confirmed that cTBS to somatosensory cortex interfered with normal sensory function and that it blocked motor memory consolidation and not the ability to retrieve a consolidated motor memory. In conclusion, the findings are consistent with the hypothesis that in adaptation learning, somatosensory cortex rather than motor cortex is involved in the consolidation of motor memory.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31613874
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000469
pii: PBIOLOGY-D-19-01670
pmc: PMC6793938
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e3000469Subventions
Organisme : DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance
ID : IA/E/14/1/501806
Pays : India
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD075740
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Neurophysiol. 2011 May;105(5):2512-21
pubmed: 21368000
Curr Biol. 2018 Jul 23;28(14):2250-2262.e3
pubmed: 29983313
J Neurosci. 1996 Jan 15;16(2):785-807
pubmed: 8551360
J Comp Neurol. 1981 Jan 10;195(2):339-65
pubmed: 7251930
J Neurosci. 1991 Jun;11(6):1855-72
pubmed: 2045890
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 May;118(5):1033-43
pubmed: 17382582
J Neurosci. 2004 Nov 3;24(44):9971-6
pubmed: 15525782
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Mar;30(3):290-306
pubmed: 29131742
J Neurosci. 2017 Sep 20;37(38):9197-9206
pubmed: 28821677
Curr Biol. 2004 Feb 3;14(3):252-6
pubmed: 14761660
Cereb Cortex. 2011 Jul;21(7):1475-84
pubmed: 21131448
Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Jan;35(1):125-34
pubmed: 22118241
J Comp Neurol. 1964 Oct;123:257-83
pubmed: 14219668
Trends Neurosci. 2016 Feb;39(2):114-123
pubmed: 26774345
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(13):2594-606
pubmed: 16300804
J Neurosci. 1994 May;14(5 Pt 2):3208-24
pubmed: 8182467
Nature. 1995 Sep 14;377(6545):155-8
pubmed: 7675082
Nature. 2002 Jun 27;417(6892):938-41
pubmed: 12087402
J Physiol Paris. 2004 Jul-Nov;98(4-6):331-48
pubmed: 16298517
Neuroimage. 2004 Jan;21(1):99-111
pubmed: 14741647
J Neurosci. 2006 Nov 29;26(48):12466-70
pubmed: 17135408
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;102(6):3505-18
pubmed: 19828727
Exp Brain Res. 1998 Aug;121(3):285-99
pubmed: 9746135
Curr Biol. 2010 Sep 14;20(17):1545-9
pubmed: 20817532
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Apr 18;114(16):4255-4260
pubmed: 28373554
J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 23;31(47):16907-15
pubmed: 22114261
J Neurosci. 1997 Jan 1;17(1):409-19
pubmed: 8987766
Exp Brain Res. 2019 May;237(5):1303-1313
pubmed: 30863880
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Mar;89(3):1223-37
pubmed: 12612044
Neuron. 2005 Jan 20;45(2):201-6
pubmed: 15664172
J Physiol. 2005 Jun 15;565(Pt 3):1039-52
pubmed: 15845584
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Apr 1;113(7):2733-41
pubmed: 25673736
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Sep;80(3):1590-7
pubmed: 9744966
J Comp Neurol. 1985 Dec 15;242(3):325-37
pubmed: 2418074
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;100(5):2948-55
pubmed: 18784273
Nature. 1996 Jul 18;382(6588):252-5
pubmed: 8717039
Neuron. 2002 Nov 14;36(4):751-65
pubmed: 12441062
Eur J Neurosci. 2010 Feb;31(3):585-92
pubmed: 20105229
J Comp Neurol. 1990 Oct 1;300(1):47-60
pubmed: 2121803
Neuron. 2011 May 26;70(4):787-801
pubmed: 21609832
Neuron. 2001 May;30(2):593-607
pubmed: 11395017
Brain Res. 1982 Apr 22;238(1):186-91
pubmed: 6805854
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jun 17;105(24):8170-7
pubmed: 18499800
Prog Brain Res. 1997;114:431-47
pubmed: 9193159
J Neurosci. 2007 Dec 5;27(49):13413-9
pubmed: 18057199
Neuron. 2017 Mar 22;93(6):1493-1503.e6
pubmed: 28334611
Vision Res. 1999 Aug;39(16):2729-37
pubmed: 10492833
J Neurophysiol. 1975 Jul;38(4):871-908
pubmed: 808592
J Neurosci. 2010 Apr 14;30(15):5384-93
pubmed: 20392960
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
pubmed: 5146491
J Neurosci. 2015 Oct 21;35(42):14316-26
pubmed: 26490869
J Neurophysiol. 1980 Apr;43(4):1090-110
pubmed: 6766995
J Physiol. 2005 Jun 15;565(Pt 3):945-50
pubmed: 15845575
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 26;4:863
pubmed: 24324449
J Neurosci. 2005 Oct 26;25(43):9919-31
pubmed: 16251440
J Neurophysiol. 1995 Sep;74(3):1037-45
pubmed: 7500130
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;782:1-21
pubmed: 23296478
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:393-415
pubmed: 10845069
J Neurosci. 2014 Feb 19;34(8):3023-32
pubmed: 24553942
Science. 1989 Sep 22;245(4924):1385-7
pubmed: 2551038
J Neurophysiol. 1990 Jan;63(1):82-104
pubmed: 2299388
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Feb;79(2):1117-23
pubmed: 9463469
Nature. 2002 Feb 7;415(6872):640-4
pubmed: 11807497
J Neurosci. 2011 May 11;31(19):6972-81
pubmed: 21562259
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1996 Apr;74(4):483-98
pubmed: 8828894
J Neurosci. 2005 Jul 6;25(27):6372-8
pubmed: 16000627
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Dec;80(6):3321-5
pubmed: 9862925
Nat Neurosci. 1998 Jul;1(3):230-4
pubmed: 10195148
Brain Res. 1987 Jun 16;413(2):360-4
pubmed: 3607486