Assessing animal individuality: links between personality and laterality in pigs.
approach-withdrawal hypothesis
coping
emotion
hemispheric dominance
motor lateralization
temperament
Journal
Current zoology
ISSN: 1674-5507
Titre abrégé: Curr Zool
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101508778
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
03
07
2018
accepted:
11
09
2018
entrez:
17
10
2019
pubmed:
17
10
2019
medline:
17
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Animal individuality is challenging to explain because individual differences are regulated by multiple selective forces that lead to unique combinations of characteristics. For instance, the study of personality, a core aspect of individuality, may benefit from integrating other factors underlying individual differences, such as lateralized cerebral processing. Indeed, the approach-withdrawal hypothesis (the left hemisphere controls approach behavior, the right hemisphere controls withdrawal behavior), may account for differences in boldness or exploration between left and right hemispheric dominant individuals. To analyze the relationships between personality and laterality we tested 80 male piglets with established laterality patterns for 2 motor functions (tail curling direction and the side of the snout used for manipulation) and a combined classification integrating both motor functions using cluster analysis. We analyzed basal salivary testosterone and cortisol along with their behavior in standardized tests as pre-established indicators of different personality traits (Boldness, Exploration, Activity, Sociability, and Coping). We found that the direction of the single motor biases showed significant associations with few personality traits. However, the combined laterality classification showed more, and more robust, significant associations with different personality traits compared with the single motor biases. These results supported the approach-withdrawal hypothesis because right-biased pigs were bolder and more explorative in a context of novelty. Additionally, right-biased pigs were more sociable than left-biased pigs. Therefore, the present study indicates that personality is indeed related to lateralized cerebral processing and provides insight into the multifactorial nature of individuality.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31616485
doi: 10.1093/cz/zoy071
pii: zoy071
pmc: PMC6784513
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
541-551Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) (2018). Published by Oxford University Press.
Références
Science. 2013 May 10;340(6133):756-9
pubmed: 23661762
Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Aug;28(4):575-89; discussion 589-633
pubmed: 16209828
Physiol Behav. 2016 Apr 1;157:116-24
pubmed: 26850291
Dev Psychobiol. 2006 Sep;48(6):418-27
pubmed: 16886183
Nat Genet. 2015 Oct;47(10):1141-8
pubmed: 26323058
Behav Brain Res. 2007 Nov 22;184(1):72-80
pubmed: 17669512
J Comp Psychol. 2016 Nov;130(4):313-320
pubmed: 27359075
Behav Neural Biol. 1989 Nov;52(3):386-405
pubmed: 2590148
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2009 Jul-Aug;32(4):216-23
pubmed: 19446881
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 30;9(6):e101165
pubmed: 24977417
Physiol Behav. 2017 Nov 1;181:117-126
pubmed: 28912089
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 22;271(1541):853-7
pubmed: 15255105
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 May;82(2):291-318
pubmed: 17437562
Curr Biol. 2007 Mar 20;17(6):R199-201
pubmed: 17371755
Anim Sci J. 2010 Dec;81(6):722-30
pubmed: 21108694
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Apr;98(4):2389-400
pubmed: 25648820
Cortex. 1986 Mar;22(1):33-53
pubmed: 3709192
J Comp Psychol. 2017 Aug;131(3):246-256
pubmed: 28414470
Laterality. 2003 Apr;8(2):169-87
pubmed: 15513221
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Jun 29;3(6):160178
pubmed: 27429775
Int J Psychophysiol. 2017 Sep;119:41-49
pubmed: 28189548
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Jun 28;5:131
pubmed: 30003083
Laterality. 2004 Apr;9(2):133-47
pubmed: 15382714
Laterality. 2008 Jul;13(4):333-73
pubmed: 18592433
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1994 Oct;20(4):413-8
pubmed: 7964523
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1999 Nov;23(7):925-35
pubmed: 10580307
J Anim Sci. 2016 Jun;94(6):2284-96
pubmed: 27285906
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 29;111(17):6153-8
pubmed: 24753599
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Feb;123(1):18-25
pubmed: 19236141
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Apr 12;364(1519):943-54
pubmed: 19064357
Behav Neurosci. 2003 Dec;117(6):1448-52
pubmed: 14674863
Curr Biol. 2013 Nov 18;23(22):2279-2282
pubmed: 24184108
J Comp Psychol. 2010 Nov;124(4):402-11
pubmed: 20853949
J Comp Psychol. 2006 Aug;120(3):176-183
pubmed: 16893254
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Feb 15;4(2):160958
pubmed: 28386447
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0184933
pubmed: 28910416
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 May 30;11:103
pubmed: 28611608
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Dec 27;365(1560):3947-58
pubmed: 21078647
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Jan;30(1):50-60
pubmed: 25498413
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Dec 7;271 Suppl 6:S420-2
pubmed: 15801592
Dev Psychobiol. 1993 May;26(4):219-35
pubmed: 8354427
Nat Commun. 2014 Jul 15;5:4392
pubmed: 25025832
Physiol Behav. 2017 May 15;174:18-26
pubmed: 28257935
Brain Lang. 2000 Jun 15;73(2):189-219
pubmed: 10856174
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 03;6:58
pubmed: 25691878
Anim Cogn. 2008 Apr;11(2):349-58
pubmed: 18066607
Sci Rep. 2015 Mar 06;5:8878
pubmed: 25743581
Laterality. 2018 Sep;23(5):576-598
pubmed: 29191074
Q Rev Biol. 2004 Sep;79(3):241-77
pubmed: 15529965
Cortex. 1998 Feb;34(1):123-30
pubmed: 9533998