Macroepidemiological aspects of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus detection by major United States veterinary diagnostic laboratories over time, age group, and specimen.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
09
04
2019
accepted:
23
09
2019
entrez:
17
10
2019
pubmed:
17
10
2019
medline:
17
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This project investigates the macroepidemiological aspects of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) RNA detection by veterinary diagnostic laboratories (VDLs) for the period 2007 through 2018. Standardized submission data and PRRSV real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) test results from porcine samples were retrieved from four VDLs representing 95% of all swine samples tested in NAHLN laboratories in the US. Anonymized data were retrieved and organized at the case level using SAS (SAS® Version 9.4, SAS® Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) with the use of PROC DATA, PROC MERGE, and PROC SQL scripts. The final aggregated and anonymized dataset comprised of 547,873 unique cases was uploaded to Power Business Intelligence-Power BI® (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington) to construct dynamic charts. The number of cases tested for PRRSV doubled from 2010 to 2018, with that increase mainly driven by samples typically used for monitoring purposes rather than diagnosis of disease. Apparent seasonal trends for the frequency of PRRSV detection were consistently observed with a higher percentage of positive cases occurring during fall or winter months and lower during summer months, perhaps due to increased testing associated with well-known seasonal occurrence of swine respiratory disease. PRRSV type 2, also known as North American genotype, accounted for 94.76% of all positive cases and was distributed across the US. PRRSV type 1, also known as European genotype, was geographically restricted and accounted for 2.15% of all positive cases. Co-detection of both strains accounted for 3.09% of the positive cases. Both oral fluid and processing fluid samples, had a rapid increase in the number of submissions soon after they were described in 2008 and 2017, respectively, suggesting rapid adoption of these specimens by the US swine industry for PRRSV monitoring in swine populations. As part of this project, a bio-informatics tool defined as Swine Disease Reporting System (SDRS) was developed. This tool has real-time capability to inform the US swine industry on the macroepidemiological aspects of PRRSV detection, and is easily adaptable for other analytes relevant to the swine industry.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31618236
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223544
pii: PONE-D-19-10159
pmc: PMC6795434
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0223544Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Paul Sundberg holds the position of Executive Director of SHIC, which provided funding to this project. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Vet Q. 1991 Jul;13(3):121-30
pubmed: 1835211
Can J Vet Res. 2003 Jan;67(1):12-9
pubmed: 12528824
Genome Announc. 2014 Apr 10;2(2):
pubmed: 24723704
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2013 Sep;25(5):649-54
pubmed: 23963154
Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere. 2011;39(2):101-12
pubmed: 22138772
Vet Q. 1991 Jul;13(3):131-6
pubmed: 1949539
Prev Vet Med. 2012 May 1;104(3-4):292-300
pubmed: 22154249
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2008 Mar;20(2):156-63
pubmed: 18319427
Vet Med (Auckl). 2016 Nov 15;7:157-170
pubmed: 30050848
Vet Microbiol. 2017 Sep;209:20-29
pubmed: 28284415
Can J Vet Res. 2002 Oct;66(4):232-9
pubmed: 12418778
Rev Sci Tech. 1993 Dec;12(4):1197-201
pubmed: 8312621
Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Jul;20(7):1227-30
pubmed: 24964136
J Vet Diagn Invest. 1992 Apr;4(2):117-26
pubmed: 1616975