Influence of foot position on the measurement of first metatarsal axial rotation using the first metatarsal axial radiographs.
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association
ISSN: 1436-2023
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Sci
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9604934
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
23
03
2019
revised:
13
09
2019
accepted:
19
09
2019
pubmed:
18
10
2019
medline:
1
1
2021
entrez:
18
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to clarify 1) the measurement error of the pronation angle using the first metatarsal axial radiograph with the pronation angle along the longitudinal axis of the first metatarsal as the reference standard, 2) the influence of variability in the foot position on the measurement error, and 3) the intra- and interrater reliability of pronation angle measurement using digitally reconstructed radiographs. Digitally reconstructed radiographs of the first metatarsal were generated from the computed tomography images of 10 feet without hallux valgus (non-HV group) and 10 feet with hallux valgus (HV group). In total, 135 images were created at different degrees of supination, plantarflexion, and adduction from each foot to simulate the first metatarsal axial view. Then, the pronation angle of the first metatarsal was measured. The measurement error was determined using the mean error and 95% limits of agreement. Simple linear regression analysis was used to test the correlations of the measurement error with pronation, plantarflexion and adduction angles. The intra- and interrater reliability of measurement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and minimum detectable change values. The mean measurement errors were 0.1° for both the non-HV and HV groups. There was no significant correlation of the measurement error with pronation, plantarflexion or adduction angles for both groups. Additionally, the intraclass correlation coefficients for the intra- and interrater reliability were more than 0.9 in both the non-HV and HV groups with the minimum detectable change values ranging from 0.7° to 1.4°. The measurement error of first metatarsal pronation using the axial view was clinically acceptable. The measurements were not influenced by the variability in foot position while obtaining the radiograph. The first metatarsal axial view could be used to quantify the first metatarsal coronal rotation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to clarify 1) the measurement error of the pronation angle using the first metatarsal axial radiograph with the pronation angle along the longitudinal axis of the first metatarsal as the reference standard, 2) the influence of variability in the foot position on the measurement error, and 3) the intra- and interrater reliability of pronation angle measurement using digitally reconstructed radiographs.
METHODS
METHODS
Digitally reconstructed radiographs of the first metatarsal were generated from the computed tomography images of 10 feet without hallux valgus (non-HV group) and 10 feet with hallux valgus (HV group). In total, 135 images were created at different degrees of supination, plantarflexion, and adduction from each foot to simulate the first metatarsal axial view. Then, the pronation angle of the first metatarsal was measured. The measurement error was determined using the mean error and 95% limits of agreement. Simple linear regression analysis was used to test the correlations of the measurement error with pronation, plantarflexion and adduction angles. The intra- and interrater reliability of measurement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and minimum detectable change values.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The mean measurement errors were 0.1° for both the non-HV and HV groups. There was no significant correlation of the measurement error with pronation, plantarflexion or adduction angles for both groups. Additionally, the intraclass correlation coefficients for the intra- and interrater reliability were more than 0.9 in both the non-HV and HV groups with the minimum detectable change values ranging from 0.7° to 1.4°.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The measurement error of first metatarsal pronation using the axial view was clinically acceptable. The measurements were not influenced by the variability in foot position while obtaining the radiograph. The first metatarsal axial view could be used to quantify the first metatarsal coronal rotation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31619322
pii: S0949-2658(19)30288-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.09.013
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
664-670Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.