Cognitive impairment and medication adherence post-stroke: A five-year follow-up of the ASPIRE-S cohort.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 01 06 2019
accepted: 02 10 2019
entrez: 18 10 2019
pubmed: 18 10 2019
medline: 18 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Control of vascular risk factors is essential for secondary stroke prevention. However, adherence to secondary prevention medications is often suboptimal, and may be affected by cognitive impairment. Few studies to date have examined associations between cognitive impairment and medication adherence post-stroke, and none have considered whether adherence to secondary prevention medications might affect subsequent cognitive function. The aim of this study was to explore prospective associations between cognitive impairment and medication non-adherence post-stroke. A five-year follow-up of 108 stroke survivors from the Action on Secondary Prevention Interventions and Rehabilitation in Stroke (ASPIRE-S) prospective observational cohort study. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment at 6 months, and a neuropsychological test battery at 5 years. Adherence to antihypertensive, antithrombotic and lipid-lowering medications was assessed using prescription refill data. The prevalence of cognitive impairment at five years was 35.6%. The prevalence of non-adherence ranged from 15.1% for lipid-lowering agents to 30.2% for antithrombotics. There were no statistically significant associations between medication non-adherence in the first year post-stroke and cognitive impairment at 5 years, nor between cognitive impairment at 6 months and non-adherence at 5 years. Stroke survivors with cognitive impairment were significantly more likely to report receiving help with taking medications [OR (95% CI): 4.84 (1.17, 20.07)]. This is the first study to explore the potential impact of non-adherence to secondary prevention medications on cognitive impairment in stroke survivors. Findings highlight the role of family members and caregivers in assisting stroke survivors with medication administration, particularly in the context of deficits in cognitive function. Involving family members and caregivers may be a legitimate and cost-effective strategy to improve medication adherence in stroke survivors.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Control of vascular risk factors is essential for secondary stroke prevention. However, adherence to secondary prevention medications is often suboptimal, and may be affected by cognitive impairment. Few studies to date have examined associations between cognitive impairment and medication adherence post-stroke, and none have considered whether adherence to secondary prevention medications might affect subsequent cognitive function. The aim of this study was to explore prospective associations between cognitive impairment and medication non-adherence post-stroke.
METHODS
A five-year follow-up of 108 stroke survivors from the Action on Secondary Prevention Interventions and Rehabilitation in Stroke (ASPIRE-S) prospective observational cohort study. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment at 6 months, and a neuropsychological test battery at 5 years. Adherence to antihypertensive, antithrombotic and lipid-lowering medications was assessed using prescription refill data.
RESULTS
The prevalence of cognitive impairment at five years was 35.6%. The prevalence of non-adherence ranged from 15.1% for lipid-lowering agents to 30.2% for antithrombotics. There were no statistically significant associations between medication non-adherence in the first year post-stroke and cognitive impairment at 5 years, nor between cognitive impairment at 6 months and non-adherence at 5 years. Stroke survivors with cognitive impairment were significantly more likely to report receiving help with taking medications [OR (95% CI): 4.84 (1.17, 20.07)].
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first study to explore the potential impact of non-adherence to secondary prevention medications on cognitive impairment in stroke survivors. Findings highlight the role of family members and caregivers in assisting stroke survivors with medication administration, particularly in the context of deficits in cognitive function. Involving family members and caregivers may be a legitimate and cost-effective strategy to improve medication adherence in stroke survivors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31622438
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223997
pii: PONE-D-19-15566
pmc: PMC6797135
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antihypertensive Agents 0
Fibrinolytic Agents 0
Hypolipidemic Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0223997

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

DW has served in the past as an advisory board member for Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Bayer, and has received personal fees for this outside the submitted work. DW received a speaker honorarium for Boehringer Ingelheim and has received personal fees for this outside the submitted work. All other authors report no conflicting interests. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Références

PLoS One. 2019 May 16;14(5):e0216822
pubmed: 31095631
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 May-Jun;55(6):590-600
pubmed: 23621969
Neuroepidemiology. 2017;49(3-4):129-134
pubmed: 29145207
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 6;13(12):e0204110
pubmed: 30521532
Lancet. 1991 Jun 22;337(8756):1521-6
pubmed: 1675378
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 6;12(2):e0170651
pubmed: 28166234
Stroke. 2011 Apr;42(4):883-8
pubmed: 21330625
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 May;73(5):691-705
pubmed: 22486599
Eur Heart J. 2016 Aug 1;37(29):2315-2381
pubmed: 27222591
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Sep;27(9):2466-2473
pubmed: 29803601
J Neurol Sci. 1996 Nov;143(1-2):1-13
pubmed: 8981292
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Oct 18;17(1):242
pubmed: 29047339
PLoS Med. 2011 May;8(5):e1001033
pubmed: 21610863
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016 Jun 8;:null
pubmed: 27231256
Int Rehabil Med. 1987;8(4):166-70
pubmed: 2440825
Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2017 Aug 29;7(2):283-296
pubmed: 29033974
Stroke. 1988 Dec;19(12):1497-500
pubmed: 3201508
Circulation. 2009 Jun 16;119(23):3028-35
pubmed: 19528344
Stroke. 2006 Sep;37(9):2220-41
pubmed: 16917086
Lancet. 1996 Nov 16;348(9038):1329-39
pubmed: 8918275
Lancet Neurol. 2009 Nov;8(11):1006-18
pubmed: 19782001
Eur Stroke J. 2016 Jun;1(2):65-75
pubmed: 29900404
Cardiovasc Ther. 2017 Dec;35(6):null
pubmed: 28836733
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Nov;73(11):1449-1455
pubmed: 28819675
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 Nov/Dec;33(6):536-543
pubmed: 29649015
J Neurosci Nurs. 2017 Apr;49(2):120-133
pubmed: 28234660
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9
pubmed: 15817019
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Nov;27(11):1189-94
pubmed: 22228412
Neurology. 2011 Nov 8;77(19):1729-36
pubmed: 22067959
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010 Sep 07;6:775-85
pubmed: 20859546
Stroke. 2009 Feb;40(2):350-4
pubmed: 19023098
Eur Stroke J. 2019 Jun;4(2):160-171
pubmed: 31259264
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 May;29(5):777-784
pubmed: 28120733
BMC Neurol. 2015 Oct 23;15:216
pubmed: 26492943
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 8;12(12):e0189339
pubmed: 29220386
Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 Mar;31(3):331-339
pubmed: 29747719
Acta Neurol Scand. 2017 Sep;136(3):187-194
pubmed: 27804110
BMC Neurol. 2015 Mar 12;15:31
pubmed: 25879880
Int J Stroke. 2015 Aug;10(6):918-23
pubmed: 26061711
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2019 Sep;32(5):275-281
pubmed: 31167593
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Feb;24(2):197-201
pubmed: 18850670
Eur J Neurol. 2015 Feb;22(2):229-38, e13-6
pubmed: 25492161
Cardiovasc Ther. 2016 Apr;34(2):85-93
pubmed: 26820710
Stroke. 1993 Jan;24(1):35-41
pubmed: 7678184
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Oct 27;17(1):252
pubmed: 29078750
Stroke. 2012 Feb;43(2):464-9
pubmed: 22156700
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 27;7(3):e014819
pubmed: 28348196
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;26(1):107-8
pubmed: 21157857
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 11;8(3):e019874
pubmed: 29526835
Circulation. 2013 Sep 17;128(12):1341-8
pubmed: 23935013
Stroke. 2018 May;49(5):1141-1147
pubmed: 29643258
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 14;7(9):e016317
pubmed: 28912194

Auteurs

Daniela Rohde (D)

Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Eva Gaynor (E)

Department of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Margaret Large (M)

Clinical Research Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Lisa Mellon (L)

Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Kathleen Bennett (K)

Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

David J Williams (DJ)

Geriatric and Stroke Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland and Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Linda Brewer (L)

Geriatric and Stroke Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland and Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Patricia Hall (P)

Clinical Research Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Elizabeth Callaly (E)

Geriatric Medicine, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Eamon Dolan (E)

Geriatric Medicine, Connolly Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Anne Hickey (A)

Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH