Land-use change has host-specific influences on avian gut microbiomes.


Journal

The ISME journal
ISSN: 1751-7370
Titre abrégé: ISME J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101301086

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2020
Historique:
received: 11 04 2019
accepted: 28 09 2019
revised: 03 08 2019
pubmed: 19 10 2019
medline: 31 3 2020
entrez: 19 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Human modification of the environment, particularly through land-use change, often reduces animal species diversity. However, the effect of land-use change on the gut microbiome of wildlife in human-dominated landscapes is not well understood despite its potential consequences for host health. We sought to quantify the effect of land-use change on wild bird gut microbiomes in a countryside landscape in Costa Rica, comprising a range of habitat types, ranging from primary and secondary forests to diversified and monoculture farms. We collected 280 fresh fecal samples from individuals belonging to six common species of saltator, thrushes, and warblers at 24 sites across this land-use gradient. Through 16S rRNA community profiling, we found that bacterial species composition responded to host species identity more strongly than to habitat type. In addition, we found evidence that habitat type affected microbial composition only for two of the six bird species. Our findings indicate that some host species and their microbiota may be more vulnerable to human disturbances than others.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31624349
doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0535-4
pii: 10.1038/s41396-019-0535-4
pmc: PMC6908588
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

318-321

Références

Miller ET, Svanbäck R, Bohannan BJM. Microbiomes as metacommunities: understanding host-associated microbes through metacommunity ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 2018;33:926–35.
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.09.002
Rothschild D, Weissbrod O, Barkan E, Korem T, Zeevi D, Costea PI, et al. Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota. Nature. 2018;555:210–5.
doi: 10.1038/nature25973
Ezenwa VO, Gerardo NM, Inouye DW, Medina M, Xavier JB. Animal behavior and the microbiome. Science. 2012;338:198–9.
doi: 10.1126/science.1227412
Moeller AH, Foerster S, Wilson ML, Pusey AE, Hahn BH, Ochman H. Social behavior shapes the chimpanzee pan-microbiome. Sci Adv. 2016;2:e1500997.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500997
Smith CC, Snowberg LK, Gregory Caporaso J, Knight R, Bolnick DI. Dietary input of microbes and host genetic variation shape among-population differences in stickleback gut microbiota. ISME J. 2015;9:2515–26.
doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.64
Barnes AD, Allen K, Kreft H, Corre MD, Jochum M, Veldkamp E, et al. Direct and cascading impacts of tropical land-use change on multi-trophic biodiversity. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:1511–19.
doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0275-7
Amato KR, Yeoman CJ, Kent A, Righini N, Carbonero F, Estrada A, et al. Habitat degradation impacts black howler monkey (Alouatta pigra) gastrointestinal microbiomes. ISME J. 2013;716:1344–53.
doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.16
Chang C-W, Huang B-H, Lin S-M, Huang C-L, Liao P-C. Changes of diet and dominant intestinal microbes in farmland frogs. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16:1–13.
doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0617-z
Belisle M, Mendenhall CD, Oviedo Brenes F, Fukami T. Temporal variation in fungal communities associated with tropical hummingbirds and nectarivorous bats. Fungal Ecol. 2014;12:44–51.
doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2014.02.007
Spor A, Koren O, Ley R. Unravelling the effects of the environment and host genotype on the gut microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9:279–90.
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2540
Goodrich JK, Davenport ER, Clark AG, Ley RE. The relationship between the human genome and microbiome comes into view. Annu Rev Genet. 2017;51:413–33.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155532
Lewis WB, Moore FR, Wang S. Characterization of the gut microbiota of migratory passerines during stopover along the northern coast of the Gulf of Mexico. J Avian Biol. 2016;47:659–68.
doi: 10.1111/jav.00954
Wu Y, Yang Y, Cao L, Yin H, Xu M, Wang Z, et al. Habitat environments impacted the gut microbiome of long-distance migratory swan geese but central species conserved. Sci Rep. 2018;8:13314.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31731-9
Perry EK, Digby A, Taylor MW. The low-diversity fecal microbiota of the critically endangered kakapo is robust to anthropogenic dietary and geographic influences. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1–13.
Wilman H, Belmaker J, Simpson J, de la Rosa C, Rivadeneira MM, Jetz W. Elton traits 1.0: species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology. 2014;95:2027.
doi: 10.1890/13-1917.1
Foster MS. The potential of fruit trees to enhance converted habitats for migrating birds in southern Mexico. Bird Conserv Int. 2007;17:45–61.
doi: 10.1017/S0959270906000554
Maurice CF, CL Knowles S, Ladau J, Pollard KS, Fenton A, Pedersen AB, et al. Marked seasonal variation in the wild mouse gut microbiota. ISME J. 2015;9:2423–34.
doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.53
Amato KR, Leigh SR, Kent A, Mackie RI, Yeoman CJ, Stumpf RM, et al. The gut microbiota appears to compensate for seasonal diet variation in the wild black howler monkey (Alouatta pigra). Micro Ecol. 2014;69:434–43.
doi: 10.1007/s00248-014-0554-7
Bergmann GT, Craine JM, Robeson MS, Fierer N. Seasonal shifts in diet and gut microbiota of the American bison (Bison bison). PLoS ONE. 2015;10:1–14.
Stiles FG, Skutch AF. A guide to the birds of Costa Rica. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1989.
The Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function, and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2014;486:207–14.
doi: 10.1038/nature11234

Auteurs

Priscilla A San Juan (PA)

Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. psanjuan@stanford.edu.
Center for Conservation Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. psanjuan@stanford.edu.

J Nicholas Hendershot (JN)

Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Center for Conservation Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Gretchen C Daily (GC)

Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Center for Conservation Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Tadashi Fukami (T)

Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH