Investigating the association between anxiety symptoms and mood disorder in high-risk offspring of bipolar parents: a comparison of Joint and Cox models.

Anxiety Bipolar disorder Cox model Depressive disorder High-risk Joint model Longitudinal Measurement error Offspring Survival analysis

Journal

International journal of bipolar disorders
ISSN: 2194-7511
Titre abrégé: Int J Bipolar Disord
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101622983

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Oct 2019
Historique:
received: 25 04 2019
accepted: 14 08 2019
entrez: 19 10 2019
pubmed: 19 10 2019
medline: 19 10 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Anxiety is associated with mood disorders including bipolar disorder. Two statistical modelling frameworks were compared to investigate the longitudinal relationship between repeatedly measured anxiety symptoms and the onset of depression and bipolar disorder in youth at confirmed familial risk. Prospectively collected data on 156 offspring of a parent with confirmed bipolar disorder participating in the Canadian Flourish high-risk offspring longitudinal cohort study were used for this analysis. As part of the research protocol at approximately yearly visits, a research psychiatrist completed the HAM-A and a semi-structured diagnostic research interview following KSADS-PL format. Diagnoses using DSM-IV criteria were made on blind consensus review of all available clinical information. We investigated two statistical approaches, Cox model and Joint model, to evaluate the relationship between repeated HAM-A scores and the onset of major depressive or bipolar disorder. The Joint model estimates the trajectory of the longitudinal variable using a longitudinal sub-model and incorporates this estimated trajectory into a Cox sub-model. There was evidence of an increased hazard of major mood disorder for high-risk individuals with higher HAM-A scores under both modelling frameworks. After adjusting for other covariates, a one-unit increase in log-transformed HAM-A score was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.74 (95% CI (1.12, 2.72)) in the Cox model compared to 2.91(95% CI (1.29, 6.52)) in the Joint model. In an exploratory analysis there was no evidence that family clustering substantially affected the conclusions. Estimated effects from the conventional Cox model, which is often the model of choice, were dramatically lower in this dataset, compared to the Joint model. While the Cox model is often considered the approach of choice for analysis, research has shown that the Joint model may be more efficient and less biased. Our analysis based on a Joint model suggests that the magnitude of association between anxiety and mood disorder in individuals at familial risk of developing bipolar disorder may be stronger than previously reported.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Anxiety is associated with mood disorders including bipolar disorder. Two statistical modelling frameworks were compared to investigate the longitudinal relationship between repeatedly measured anxiety symptoms and the onset of depression and bipolar disorder in youth at confirmed familial risk.
METHODS METHODS
Prospectively collected data on 156 offspring of a parent with confirmed bipolar disorder participating in the Canadian Flourish high-risk offspring longitudinal cohort study were used for this analysis. As part of the research protocol at approximately yearly visits, a research psychiatrist completed the HAM-A and a semi-structured diagnostic research interview following KSADS-PL format. Diagnoses using DSM-IV criteria were made on blind consensus review of all available clinical information. We investigated two statistical approaches, Cox model and Joint model, to evaluate the relationship between repeated HAM-A scores and the onset of major depressive or bipolar disorder. The Joint model estimates the trajectory of the longitudinal variable using a longitudinal sub-model and incorporates this estimated trajectory into a Cox sub-model.
RESULTS RESULTS
There was evidence of an increased hazard of major mood disorder for high-risk individuals with higher HAM-A scores under both modelling frameworks. After adjusting for other covariates, a one-unit increase in log-transformed HAM-A score was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.74 (95% CI (1.12, 2.72)) in the Cox model compared to 2.91(95% CI (1.29, 6.52)) in the Joint model. In an exploratory analysis there was no evidence that family clustering substantially affected the conclusions.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Estimated effects from the conventional Cox model, which is often the model of choice, were dramatically lower in this dataset, compared to the Joint model. While the Cox model is often considered the approach of choice for analysis, research has shown that the Joint model may be more efficient and less biased. Our analysis based on a Joint model suggests that the magnitude of association between anxiety and mood disorder in individuals at familial risk of developing bipolar disorder may be stronger than previously reported.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31624932
doi: 10.1186/s40345-019-0157-9
pii: 10.1186/s40345-019-0157-9
pmc: PMC6797685
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

22

Subventions

Organisme : CIHR
ID : 152976
Organisme : NSERC Discovery Grant
ID : 261497

Références

Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;204(2):122-8
pubmed: 24262817
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 May;170(5):542-9
pubmed: 23429906
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;68(10):1012-20
pubmed: 21969459
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2003 Nov 15;123C(1):48-58
pubmed: 14601036
Am J Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 1;176(9):720-729
pubmed: 30525908
Am J Med Genet. 1993 Dec 15;48(4):192-9
pubmed: 8135302
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010 Dec;19(4):223-32
pubmed: 20718076
J Affect Disord. 2013 Sep 5;150(2):363-9
pubmed: 23707033
Biometrics. 2006 Dec;62(4):1037-43
pubmed: 17156277
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009 Nov;120(5):378-85
pubmed: 19807719
Biostatistics. 2000 Dec;1(4):465-80
pubmed: 12933568
Biostatistics. 2002 Dec;3(4):511-28
pubmed: 12933595
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23:56-62
pubmed: 14399272
Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 1;173(7):695-704
pubmed: 26892940
J Affect Disord. 1994 Oct;32(2):85-95
pubmed: 7829768
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;44(1):334-44
pubmed: 25604450
Pharmacopsychiatria. 1983 Nov;16(6):195-200
pubmed: 6665029
Stat Med. 2015 Jun 30;34(14):2181-95
pubmed: 24634327
Stat Med. 1992 Oct-Nov;11(14-15):1861-70
pubmed: 1480878

Auteurs

Ruoxi Dong (R)

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.

George Stefan (G)

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.

Julie Horrocks (J)

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada. jhorrock@uoguelph.ca.

Sarah M Goodday (SM)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Ln, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.

Anne Duffy (A)

Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, 99 University Ave, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Visiting Fellow, All Souls College, University of Oxford, High Street, Oxford, OX1 4AL, UK.

Classifications MeSH