Growth differentiation factor 15 and early prognosis after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Biomarkers
Growth differentiation factor 15
Neurologic outcome
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Prognostication
Journal
Annals of intensive care
ISSN: 2110-5820
Titre abrégé: Ann Intensive Care
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101562873
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Oct 2019
17 Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
17
05
2019
accepted:
05
10
2019
entrez:
19
10
2019
pubmed:
19
10
2019
medline:
19
10
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) is an inflammatory cytokine released in response to tissue injury. It has prognostic value in cardiovascular diseases and other acute and chronic conditions. Here, we explored the value of GDF-15 as an early predictor of neurologic outcome after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Prospective registry study of patients in coma after an OHCA, admitted in the intensive cardiac care unit from a single university center. Serum levels of GDF-15 were measured on admission. Neurologic status was evaluated according to the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale. The relationship between GDF-15 levels and poor neurologic outcome at 6 months was analyzed. Among 62 patients included, 32 (51.6%) presented poor outcome (CPC 3-5). Patients with CPC 3-5 exhibited significantly higher GDF-15 levels (median, 17.1 [IQR, 11.1-20.4] ng/mL) compared to those with CPC 1-2 (7.6 [IQR, 4.1-13.1] ng/mL; p = 0.004). Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that age (OR, 1.09; 95% CI 1.01-1.17; p = 0.020), home setting arrest (OR, 8.07; 95% CI 1.61-40.42; p = 0.011), no bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OR, 7.91; 95% CI 1.84-34.01; p = 0.005), and GDF-15 levels (OR, 3.74; 95% CI 1.32-10.60; p = 0.013) were independent predictors of poor outcome. The addition of GDF-15 in a dichotomous manner (≥ 10.8 vs. < 10.8 ng/mL) to the resulting clinical model improved discrimination; it increased the area under the curve from 0.867 to 0.917, and the associated continuous net reclassification improvement was 0.90 (95% CI 0.48-1.44), which allowed reclassification of 37.1% of patients. After an OHCA, increased GDF-15 levels were an independent, early predictor of poor neurologic outcome. Furthermore, when added to the most common clinical factors, GDF-15 improved discrimination and allowed patient reclassification.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) is an inflammatory cytokine released in response to tissue injury. It has prognostic value in cardiovascular diseases and other acute and chronic conditions. Here, we explored the value of GDF-15 as an early predictor of neurologic outcome after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
METHODS
METHODS
Prospective registry study of patients in coma after an OHCA, admitted in the intensive cardiac care unit from a single university center. Serum levels of GDF-15 were measured on admission. Neurologic status was evaluated according to the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale. The relationship between GDF-15 levels and poor neurologic outcome at 6 months was analyzed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among 62 patients included, 32 (51.6%) presented poor outcome (CPC 3-5). Patients with CPC 3-5 exhibited significantly higher GDF-15 levels (median, 17.1 [IQR, 11.1-20.4] ng/mL) compared to those with CPC 1-2 (7.6 [IQR, 4.1-13.1] ng/mL; p = 0.004). Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that age (OR, 1.09; 95% CI 1.01-1.17; p = 0.020), home setting arrest (OR, 8.07; 95% CI 1.61-40.42; p = 0.011), no bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OR, 7.91; 95% CI 1.84-34.01; p = 0.005), and GDF-15 levels (OR, 3.74; 95% CI 1.32-10.60; p = 0.013) were independent predictors of poor outcome. The addition of GDF-15 in a dichotomous manner (≥ 10.8 vs. < 10.8 ng/mL) to the resulting clinical model improved discrimination; it increased the area under the curve from 0.867 to 0.917, and the associated continuous net reclassification improvement was 0.90 (95% CI 0.48-1.44), which allowed reclassification of 37.1% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
After an OHCA, increased GDF-15 levels were an independent, early predictor of poor neurologic outcome. Furthermore, when added to the most common clinical factors, GDF-15 improved discrimination and allowed patient reclassification.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31624933
doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0593-9
pii: 10.1186/s13613-019-0593-9
pmc: PMC6797678
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
119Références
J Comp Neurol. 2001 Oct 8;439(1):32-45
pubmed: 11579380
Circulation. 2008 Dec 2;118(23):2452-83
pubmed: 18948368
J Neurosci. 2000 Dec 1;20(23):8597-603
pubmed: 11102463
Resuscitation. 2013 Jun;84(6):782-7
pubmed: 23313427
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Oct;40(10):1518-27
pubmed: 25138227
Resuscitation. 2016 Jan;98:1-8
pubmed: 26525271
Resuscitation. 2013 Mar;84(3):337-42
pubmed: 23000363
Resuscitation. 2014 Dec;85(12):1779-89
pubmed: 25438253
Eur Heart J. 2009 May;30(9):1057-65
pubmed: 19168526
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;32(1):72-8
pubmed: 21613788
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Aug;16(8):880-7
pubmed: 24903195
Crit Care. 2015 Mar 31;19:132
pubmed: 25886856
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Nov;39(11):1972-80
pubmed: 23942856
Clin Chem. 2017 Jan;63(1):140-151
pubmed: 28062617
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 May 1;177(9):1018-25
pubmed: 18263797
Cell Tissue Res. 2011 Feb;343(2):399-409
pubmed: 21128084
Crit Care. 2017 Jun 20;21(1):153
pubmed: 28629472
Resuscitation. 2009 Jul;80(7):784-9
pubmed: 19467754
Lancet. 1975 Mar 1;1(7905):480-4
pubmed: 46957
J Neurol. 2012 Aug;259(8):1574-9
pubmed: 22231869
Dis Markers. 2017;2017:5271203
pubmed: 29180833
Crit Care. 2013 May 24;17(3):R92
pubmed: 23706007
Eur Heart J. 2007 Dec;28(23):2858-65
pubmed: 17977844
Resuscitation. 2018 Sep;130:138-145
pubmed: 30036589
Med Hypotheses. 2017 Aug;105:34-47
pubmed: 28735650
Crit Care Med. 2013 Jun;41(6):1492-501
pubmed: 23507719
Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:100-47
pubmed: 26477701
Resuscitation. 2015 Apr;89:75-80
pubmed: 25619444
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Jan 1;76(1):64-71
pubmed: 30383090
Resuscitation. 2014 Nov;85(11):1573-9
pubmed: 25238742
Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:202-22
pubmed: 26477702
Emerg Med J. 2016 Oct;33(10):690-5
pubmed: 27287003
Ann Neurol. 2017 Nov;82(5):665-675
pubmed: 28981963
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 19;65(19):2104-14
pubmed: 25975474
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Nov;30(11):2126-8
pubmed: 15365608
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 Sep 3;:2048872618797599
pubmed: 30175597
Resuscitation. 2014 Sep;85(9):1225-31
pubmed: 24960427
Resuscitation. 2014 Dec;85(12):1654-61
pubmed: 25260722
Clin Chem. 2007 Feb;53(2):284-91
pubmed: 17185363
Eur Heart J. 2016 Nov 07;37(42):3222-3228
pubmed: 26497161