SAMPL6 blind predictions of water-octanol partition coefficients using nonequilibrium alchemical approaches.

Crooks theorem Fast growth Fast switching HREX Hamiltonian replica exchange LogP Non-equilibrium SAMPL6 Solute tempering Solvation free energy Torsional tempering

Journal

Journal of computer-aided molecular design
ISSN: 1573-4951
Titre abrégé: J Comput Aided Mol Des
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8710425

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2020
Historique:
received: 09 06 2019
accepted: 03 10 2019
pubmed: 19 10 2019
medline: 8 7 2021
entrez: 19 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In this paper, we compute, by means of a non equilibrium alchemical technique, the water-octanol partition coefficients (LogP) for a series of drug-like compounds in the context of the SAMPL6 challenge initiative. Our blind predictions are based on three of the most popular non-polarizable force fields, CGenFF, GAFF2, and OPLS-AA and are critically compared to other MD-based predictions produced using free energy perturbation or thermodynamic integration approaches with stratification. The proposed non-equilibrium method emerges has a reliable tool for LogP prediction, systematically being among the top performing submissions in all force field classes for at least two among the various indicators such as the Pearson or the Kendall correlation coefficients or the mean unsigned error. Contrarily to the widespread equilibrium approaches, that yielded apparently very disparate results in the SAMPL6 challenge, all our independent prediction sets, irrespective of the adopted force field and of the adopted estimate (unidirectional or bidirectional) are, mutually, from moderately to strongly correlated.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31624982
doi: 10.1007/s10822-019-00233-9
pii: 10.1007/s10822-019-00233-9
doi:

Substances chimiques

Octanols 0
Solvents 0
Water 059QF0KO0R

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

371-384

Références

Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D1202-13
pubmed: 26400175
J Chem Phys. 2018 Oct 14;149(14):144111
pubmed: 30316276
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Oct 28;100(22):12564-9
pubmed: 14528008
Science. 1994 Aug 26;265(5176):1219-21
pubmed: 17787590
J Comput Chem. 2010 Mar;31(4):671-90
pubmed: 19575467
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2019 Jul 7;21(25):13826-13834
pubmed: 31211310
J Comput Chem. 2015 May 30;36(14):1083-101
pubmed: 25826578
J Chem Theory Comput. 2012 Jul 10;8(7):2373-82
pubmed: 26588970
J Comput Chem. 2010 Apr 15;31(5):1106-16
pubmed: 19824035
J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Dec 21;52(12):3144-54
pubmed: 23146088
J Chem Inf Model. 2016 Jun 27;56(6):1117-21
pubmed: 27231982
J Chem Theory Comput. 2018 Jul 10;14(7):3890-3902
pubmed: 29874073
J Phys Chem B. 2010 Aug 19;114(32):10235-53
pubmed: 20701361
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;924:271-311
pubmed: 23034753
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Sep 27;102(39):13749-54
pubmed: 16172406
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jul 3;45(W1):W331-W336
pubmed: 28444340
J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Dec 21;52(12):3155-68
pubmed: 23145473
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2013 Jul 21;15(27):11178-89
pubmed: 23450152
J Chem Theory Comput. 2014 Jul 8;10(7):2813-23
pubmed: 26586508
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016 Jun 1;18(22):14991-5004
pubmed: 27193067
Phys Rev Lett. 2003 Oct 3;91(14):140601
pubmed: 14611511
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2017 Jan;31(1):1-19
pubmed: 27658802
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2016 Nov;30(11):927-944
pubmed: 27677750
J Chem Inf Model. 2017 Jun 26;57(6):1240-1245
pubmed: 28586207
J Chem Theory Comput. 2019 Mar 12;15(3):1983-1995
pubmed: 30694667
J Chem Phys. 2016 Aug 21;145(7):074501
pubmed: 27544113
J Chem Theory Comput. 2015 Jun 9;11(6):2536-49
pubmed: 26575553
J Chem Phys. 2006 Oct 28;125(16):164101
pubmed: 17092057
J Phys Chem B. 2017 Apr 20;121(15):3864-3870
pubmed: 28224794
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016 Jun 1;18(22):15005-18
pubmed: 27193181
J Chem Inf Model. 2007 Nov-Dec;47(6):2140-8
pubmed: 17985865
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2020 Apr;34(4):405-420
pubmed: 31858363
J Chem Eng Data. 2017 May 11;62(5):1559-1569
pubmed: 29056756
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2018 Oct;32(10):937-963
pubmed: 30415285
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2018 Oct;32(10):965-982
pubmed: 30128927
J Mol Graph Model. 2017 Jan;71:233-241
pubmed: 27984798

Auteurs

Piero Procacci (P)

Department of Chemistry, University of Florence, Via Lastruccia n. 3, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, FI, Italy. procacci@unifi.it.

Guido Guarnieri (G)

ENEA, Portici Research Centre, DTE-ICT-HPC, P.le E. Fermi, 1, 80055, Portici, NA, Italy.

Articles similaires

Photosynthesis Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Carbon Dioxide Molecular Dynamics Simulation Cyanobacteria
Animals Dietary Fiber Dextran Sulfate Mice Disease Models, Animal
Silicon Dioxide Water Hot Temperature Compressive Strength X-Ray Diffraction
1.00
Oryza Agricultural Irrigation Potassium Sodium Soil

Classifications MeSH