A Compendium of Modern Minimally Invasive Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation Techniques.


Journal

Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)
ISSN: 2332-4260
Titre abrégé: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101635417

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 06 2020
Historique:
received: 21 06 2018
accepted: 19 07 2019
pubmed: 19 10 2019
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 19 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) evacuation has gained popularity with success in early-phase clinical trials. This procedure, however, is performed in very different ways around the world. To provide a technical description of these strategies that facilitates comparison and aids decisions in which surgery to perform, and to inform further improvements in minimally invasive ICH evacuation. Major authors of clinical trials evaluating each of the main techniques were contacted and asked to supply a case example and technical description of their respective surgeries. Five major techniques are presented including stereotactic thrombolysis, craniopuncture, endoscopic, endoscope-assisted, and endoport-mediated. Techniques differ in numerous ways including the size of the cranial access, the size of the access corridor through the brain to the hematoma, and the evacuation strategy. Regarding cranial access, a burr hole is created in stereotactic thrombolysis and craniopuncture, a small craniectomy in endoscopic, and a small craniotomy in the other 2. Access corridors through the parenchyma range from 3 mm in craniopuncture to 13.5 mm in the endoport-mediated evacuation. Regarding evacuation strategies, stereotactic thrombolysis and craniopuncture rely on passive drainage from a catheter placed during surgery that remains in place for multiple days, while the other 3 techniques rely on active evacuation with suction and bipolar cautery. Future comparative clinical trials may identify the advantageous components of each strategy and contribute to improved outcomes in this patient population.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) evacuation has gained popularity with success in early-phase clinical trials. This procedure, however, is performed in very different ways around the world.
OBJECTIVE
To provide a technical description of these strategies that facilitates comparison and aids decisions in which surgery to perform, and to inform further improvements in minimally invasive ICH evacuation.
METHODS
Major authors of clinical trials evaluating each of the main techniques were contacted and asked to supply a case example and technical description of their respective surgeries.
RESULTS
Five major techniques are presented including stereotactic thrombolysis, craniopuncture, endoscopic, endoscope-assisted, and endoport-mediated. Techniques differ in numerous ways including the size of the cranial access, the size of the access corridor through the brain to the hematoma, and the evacuation strategy. Regarding cranial access, a burr hole is created in stereotactic thrombolysis and craniopuncture, a small craniectomy in endoscopic, and a small craniotomy in the other 2. Access corridors through the parenchyma range from 3 mm in craniopuncture to 13.5 mm in the endoport-mediated evacuation. Regarding evacuation strategies, stereotactic thrombolysis and craniopuncture rely on passive drainage from a catheter placed during surgery that remains in place for multiple days, while the other 3 techniques rely on active evacuation with suction and bipolar cautery.
CONCLUSION
Future comparative clinical trials may identify the advantageous components of each strategy and contribute to improved outcomes in this patient population.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31625580
pii: 5592231
doi: 10.1093/ons/opz308
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

710-720

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Auteurs

Jonathan Pan (J)

Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Alexander G Chartrain (AG)

Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Jacopo Scaggiante (J)

Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Alejandro M Spiotta (AM)

Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.

Zhouping Tang (Z)

Department of Neurology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Wenzhi Wang (W)

Beijing Neurosurgical Institute; Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Gustavo Pradilla (G)

Department of Neurological Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Yuichi Murayama (Y)

Department of Neurosurgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Ryosuke Mori (R)

Department of Neurosurgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

J Mocco (J)

Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Christopher P Kellner (CP)

Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH